Hygraph
HygraphReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
714 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Good solution, reliable system.
What do you like best about the product?
The interface is very well laid out and user-friendly. The docs are very clear.
What do you dislike about the product?
There are some advanced features missing (media domain optimization for SEO for instance), some are being introduced though.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Creating complex information architectures that can be used in different touchpoints.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
It is one of the top-level headless CMS offers, check that it has all the features you need, every platform on the market has small differences that might make a big difference in your implementation.
Flexible system, little technical for end users
What do you like best about the product?
Building content using models, fetching data using API. Robust and flexible. Easy asset management for content managers.
What do you dislike about the product?
For en users like content managers a little technical system.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Supports our new online shop using headless development.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Check easy building models. For content managers manage assets and use content views.
intuitive interface, but complex logic and interaction
What do you like best about the product?
It's the most user friendly cms platform i have experienced. visually less confusing than other similar platforms in a content implementation perspective.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nested navigation is very confusing and annoying in general. Publishing vs Save logic gets confusing. Also has a few detectable bugs that influence the work flow.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
easier to find existent components, and therefore to edit them. Assets library is also very intuitive and easy to use. Setting up components in BE is easier to understand and to brief to editors compared to other competitors.
Great choice for a headless CMS
What do you like best about the product?
- Polished UI for admins
- Flexibility from GraphQL
- Support responds timely
- UI Extensions
- Flexibility from GraphQL
- Support responds timely
- UI Extensions
What do you dislike about the product?
- there are some UX flows in the admin which i wish were better
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
- Easy way for site admins to manage content on our website and app
Recommendations to others considering the product:
- Pick GraphCMS if you need a headless CMS which is easy to start and also has the flexibility to support multiple use cases
GraphCMS understands the concept of doing one thing well, and they do it well.
What do you like best about the product?
It's fast and intuitive. I also like that the online tools for managing the models are quick (both reactiveness and navigation wise) and they don't require a steep learning curve to get started.
What do you dislike about the product?
The documentation for backloading WYSIWYG blocks could be a little clearer. I had to import a bunch of records, and ended up relying on trial and error to get these fields to load properly. My need was probably more of an edge case (since the whole idea of GraphQL is to collect data that will be later recalled), but it is one part that could be a little clearer.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We did a set of data which could be related to other data, both as a parent of the other data, or a child, or, in some weird cases, as both. GraphCMS relationships made this intuitive.
It is fairly easy to use, especially for non web developers like myself.
What do you like best about the product?
Most of the functionality is fairly clear.
What do you dislike about the product?
Pushing changes to our website does take some time. It also lacks some functionality that we needed for our website, like contract creation.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We've automated many of our booking processes as well as set up accounts for our team.
Graphcms is perfect headless cms to recommend
What do you like best about the product?
I like user interface, nice playground. Also graphcms has localization support, union types with relations out of box and good user documentation.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is no support of svg files when using crop image functionality
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
No backend and server implementation required when using graphcms. This is a huge benefit
Powerful and Flexible Content Management Tool with a Graphql edge
What do you like best about the product?
Multilanguage and localization support.
The ability to give granular level permissions.
The ability to give granular level permissions.
What do you dislike about the product?
Learning Curve is high, ie Some users, especially those transitioning from more traditional CMS platforms like WordPress, note that Hygraph can have a significant learning curve and the interface may initially seem a bit technical
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use GraphCMS for the entire content management for our App. The contents can be easily configured using graph cms ui.
Overall experience is good.
What do you like best about the product?
Below are the things which I like the most.
- The ease of use
- Slick design
- rich-text visual editor
- Easy-to-use localization feature
- Scalability
- Good Speed
- API integration
- Support
- The ease of use
- Slick design
- rich-text visual editor
- Easy-to-use localization feature
- Scalability
- Good Speed
- API integration
- Support
What do you dislike about the product?
Below are the things which I dislike the most.
- Content should not migrate from one environment to another
- Found the bugs during the adding the content If we add content using the 2 different tabs in the browser then it will be a mess.
- Manually refresh the dashboard for new content to appear
- Missing proper video tutorials
- Content should not migrate from one environment to another
- Found the bugs during the adding the content If we add content using the 2 different tabs in the browser then it will be a mess.
- Manually refresh the dashboard for new content to appear
- Missing proper video tutorials
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Using the graph cms we do not need individual cms like WordPress. Now I can manage all cms content using the graph cms.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
If you are finding any WordPress replacement then please go with the graph cms.
Easy, intuitive, simple
What do you like best about the product?
- Great UI, no clutter
- Easy localization
- Big selection of field types
- Awesome support
- Great docs and examples
- Feature packed
- No boilerplate code
- Easy localization
- Big selection of field types
- Awesome support
- Great docs and examples
- Feature packed
- No boilerplate code
What do you dislike about the product?
Did not see anything to be crtitcal about, throughout my short experience I stumbled upon a bug, reporte it to support, it was fixed shortly after.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Deploying webapps that are packed with content has never been easier. Using graphCMS have saved me a lot of time. I use with Nextjs and Apollo.
showing 601 - 610