Control-M SaaS
BMC SoftwareExternal reviews
128 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Centralized Task Management with Proactive Alerts
What do you like best about the product?
Control-M shows all the tasks that feed into our applications in one clear place. I can quickly check if a data load, report, or system update ran the way it should. The alerts also help us catch issues early.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some menus take a few clicks to reach, and new users need time to learn where everything is. The design could be simpler, especially when you have many jobs linked together.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M helps us see job status fast, fix issues before users notice, and understand how different systems connect. It reduces guesswork and speeds up daily support work.
Centralized Job Management and Secure File Transfers Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Control-M keeps all our billing, reporting, and data transfer jobs in one place. It moves files securely, shows clear job status, and helps us make sure key tasks like invoicing and reconciliations finish on time.
What do you dislike about the product?
When many jobs are added, the screens can feel crowded and it takes longer to find what you need. Some features need training, and costs can rise if you add more modules.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M cuts manual work, reduces missed runs, and makes it easier to fix issues quickly. It helps our team run revenue workflows smoothly and keeps month end tasks more predictable.
Empowers CI/CD with Jobs as Code and Robust Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I value that Control-M supports Jobs as Code and an Automation API, so we keep job definitions in source control and deploy them from CI pipelines. That makes workflows repeatable and testable.
What do you dislike about the product?
Getting Automation API, agents, and integrations running takes planning. The platform is feature rich but not lightweight, and licensing can add cost as you add modules.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It replaces fragile ad-hoc scripts with managed, auditable workflows and centralizes file transfers (MFT), which reduces manual fixes and speeds recovery during incidents. That improves reliability across on prem and cloud environments.
Clear Job Visibility and Seamless API Integration
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Control-M gives me a clear view of all scheduled jobs in one place. The visual flows and logs make it easy to track failures, understand what went wrong, and share details with developers. It also supports job changes through the API, which helps keep deployments consistent.
What do you dislike about the product?
It’s a powerful tool, but it can feel heavy at first. Managing many jobs and modules takes time, and new users need training to use all features. Costs can also go up if you add more components.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M reduces manual work, keeps workflows consistent, and helps us fix issues faster. It centralizes job monitoring and file transfers, which makes support work much easier and more predictable.
Centralized Job Scheduling Made Easy with Cloud Convenience
What do you like best about the product?
Control-M lets me schedule and run jobs from one place, so small teams can stop running manual scripts and avoid missed tasks. The cloud/SaaS option makes it easier to get started without heavy servers.
What do you dislike about the product?
It can feel more complex than a simple scheduler. There is setup work and some learning needed, and the Starter Pack SaaS has a noticeable monthly cost for small businesses.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It automates routine batch jobs and file moves so my team spends less time on manual runs and troubleshooting. Built-in logging and managed file transfer make audits and secure file handling easier.
Reliable and Efficient Workflow Management with Control-M
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate how Control-M simplifies the management of complex workflows. The centralized dashboards are extremely valuable to me, enabling a comprehensive view of all my jobs, dependencies, and SLAs in one location. This centralization significantly improves my efficiency by providing quick access to critical information. I also love how swiftly I can troubleshoot failures thanks to the clear logs and alerts, which save me a lot of time. Overall, Control-M makes my batch processes more reliable, automated, and predictable. These features collectively streamline my operations and ensure that our workflows are both reliable and highly efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
I feel that the user interface of Control-M is a bit heavy and not very intuitive, especially for new users. This complexity sometimes leads to creating complex workflows requiring more clicks than anticipated. Additionally, the logs provided can be overly detailed, which makes identifying the exact error line time-consuming. While the platform is reliable once familiar, these initial challenges can be a hurdle.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M to automate and monitor workflows, minimize manual errors, ensure timely batch processing, handle dependencies, and swiftly resolve failures, enhancing the reliability and efficiency of our operations.
instrument for overseeing daily operations
What do you like best about the product?
Managing tasks across various systems without switching between tools is made simple with Control-M. The timeline view makes it easier to keep track of what's pending, what's running, and potential delays. Additionally, it provides unambiguous alerts, making it simple to respond before a problem impacts workflow.
What do you dislike about the product?
When establishing new workflows, some configuration steps seem a little onerous. In some places, the interface might use some updating. Because the platform is so feature-rich, it also takes time for new users to comprehend all of the options.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Control-M minimizes manual labor and scheduling errors by assisting in task coordination across various applications. It makes it simpler to locate bottlenecks by centralizing all job monitoring in one location. This keeps things running smoothly and increases the overall stability of our processes.
Effortless Scheduling That Saves Time
What do you like best about the product?
I like how it allows me to schedule jobs all on one. It gives me full visibility
What do you dislike about the product?
It looks really old and blocky, not good ui and not intuitive
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Apps on my team rely on scripts, or separate pipeline tools. Hard to track, no central view, and easy to miss failures. I don’t need to log into multiple servers to understand batch behavior. It saves time debugging because everything is in a single pane of glass.
Efficient Workflow Management, But Pricey
What do you like best about the product?
I appreciate Control-M for its ability to automate and manage various workflows, which significantly reduces the need for manual monitoring. It efficiently schedules jobs and tracks dependencies, ensuring that processes run smoothly, even when multiple systems are involved. One of the standout features for me is how it consolidates all workflows into a single platform, providing clear visibility over every job, its status, and its dependencies. This integration minimizes the need to switch between different tools, drastically reducing manual work and simplifying the management of complex processes. Overall, Control-M saves time, reduces errors, and enhances operational organization.
What do you dislike about the product?
I find Control-M to be somewhat complex initially, which slows down development. Its performance tends to be sluggish, particularly when managing multiple workflows. The pricing is quite complex and the licensing fees are very high, which makes the cost aspect challenging. Additionally, the user interface could use some improvement, and I feel that cloud integration needs to be enhanced.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M to automate workflows across systems, saving time and reducing errors. It centralizes job scheduling and monitoring, providing clear visibility and simplifying management. This reduces manual work and keeps operations organized despite initial complexity.
Reliable Task Completion with Control-M, Minor Real-Time Limitations
What do you like best about the product?
I really appreciate how Control-M manages to deliver tasks with impressive speed, ensuring swift completion that aligns well with my deadlines. This rapid execution does not come at the expense of dependability, as I find the tool's reliability to be a standout feature, consistently delivering on expectations without fault. It marks a solid implementation that I can trust for crucial workload automation and job scheduling. These aspects make my experiences with Control-M not just efficient but also instill confidence in the results it delivers. Additionally, I value the robustness of the outcomes, which seem to be built on substantial and hearty framework, rather than being superficial or temporary solutions.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would like to see more of a real-time event processing capability and more dynamic workflows in Control-M.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Control-M to solve workload automation and job scheduling issues, benefiting from its speed and reliability, which ensures robust results.
showing 1 - 10