I have been working with Mimecast Email Security.
Advanced Email Security
Mimecast: Work Protected™Reviews from AWS customer
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Customizable Email Security Policies That Protect Against Many Threats
Email security has protected data and now simplifies archiving and prevention workflows
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The functionality, including email archiving and data loss prevention features, is adequate. Mimecast Email Security offers certain features inherent to the product which are beneficial. In case of additional needs, I explore further customization.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement since new threats are emerging. Considering the availability of new features would be worthwhile. Mimecast Email Security is somewhat expensive compared to the competition in the Indian market, and the local presence is lacking as they do not have a local representative currently.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Mimecast Email Security for approximately seven months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Currently, I am not facing any issues with Mimecast Email Security. If something comes up, I will be keen on exploring other products.
What other advice do I have?
I have been satisfied with Mimecast Email Security as a good solution. However, if I need anything additional, I will surely explore what can be done on that. I would rate this product nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Robust Email Security Made Simple and Effective
Implementation is smooth and well-documented, with minimal disruption to existing mail flow. Integration with M465 is seamless and features like URL protection, attachment sandboxing and impersonation protection work effectively out of box.
Effortless Spam Blocking and Enhanced Email Security
AI-Powered Security with Outstanding Threat Protection
Strong Phishing / Impersonation Protection
Excellent Spam & Virus Defense
Deployment Flexibility
Integrated Platform
Aggressive Out-of-the-Box Settings / False Positives
Business Email Compromise (BEC)
Mimecast, a Great Mail security tool
Consistent, Low-Noise Phishing Protection with Smart Features
Great when we started with them, declined quickly after implementation
Experience high detection and user-friendly policies with reliable email security implementation
What is our primary use case?
My use case for Mimecast Email Security is that it's one of the best solutions for a traditional gateway. Check Point is the best for the AI-based solution. We are selling both as a partner for both solutions to customers.
What is most valuable?
Mimecast Email Security includes the best gateway solution across all Cisco, Trend Micro, and other solutions. For customers who want a traditional gateway, we suggest using Mimecast Email Security. For customers who want the advanced solution, we suggest Check Point for those features.
Mimecast Email Security's anti-phishing features are good and perform as expected.
Mimecast Email Security is a good solution because our customers haven't reported any phishing emails being delivered. It performs effectively as a traditional gateway solution. We haven't received any complaints regarding this solution.
What needs improvement?
Mimecast Email Security can be improved by adding some API integrations. Instead of remaining a traditional gateway, Mimecast Email Security needs to provide API solutions similar to Check Point.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Mimecast Email Security for almost two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
The system is not user-friendly because you have to create policies that are mapped in a dictionary. As an IT engineer, I understand how it works, but explaining it to another IT person can be difficult. Having more user-friendly dashboards would improve the work experience. In Mimecast Email Security, checking policies in the dictionary or gateway is very complicated, and not everyone understands this process.
If you examine the Check Point portal, it's user-friendly with easily accessible tabs that anyone can explore. With Mimecast Email Security, making changes might impact existing mailboxes. The portal is complicated compared to Check Point's user-friendly interface.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Mimecast Email Security is a stable solution. We don't encounter many issues with it. Customers report issues rarely, once or twice a month at most. It's performing well, and customers aren't reporting significant problems after implementation. They confirm it's a good solution where only one or two rare emails get through, while the rest are properly blocked without any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Mimecast Email Security is a scalable solution. If Mimecast Email Security introduces API solutions, it will dominate the market. This would also be beneficial for Check Point.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate my experience with technical support of Mimecast Email Security between seven and eight out of ten for their support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of Mimecast Email Security was easy, though it's not user-friendly.
What about the implementation team?
My relationship with Mimecast Email Security is as a partner.
What other advice do I have?
I am not familiar with the pricing details of Mimecast Email Security as I am an engineer. The sales team manages all pricing-related matters.
Most customers are using Mimecast Email Security in the cloud only, not on-premises.
Mimecast Email Security has a high catch rate compared to other solutions such as Cisco, Trend Micro, or Barracuda. They consistently implement new solutions and inform all their customers and partners about new features, which is a positive aspect.
Based on overall experience, Mimecast Email Security is the best solution for traditional gateways. Having worked with multiple traditional gateways including Cisco, Trend Micro, and Barracuda, Mimecast Email Security stands out as the superior option.
On a scale of 1-10, I rate Mimecast Email Security a 10 overall.