Codefreah as a CI/CD deployment tool
What do you like best about the product?
Codefresh has helped our organisation centralize the entire deployment pipeline, from build to test to deploy to maintenance. Before Codefresh, we needed different UI representations and backend tools for Admins and Developers for the entire release pipeline, this problem has been eliminated by Codefreah. And even more importantly, it is cheaper than the preious tool we used. In today's agile way of working, we needed something which could be easy to integrate and implement considering the high frequency of use, which is fulfilled by Codefreah
What do you dislike about the product?
There definitely are some drawbacks which I think can be worked upon by their dev and business team, but no dealbreakers in my opinion. For instance, the public support documentation is somethiing that can be improved. We also noticed some cost upticks when we started migrating some of our more complex projects to Codefresh. Also, when it comes to mission critical projects, the fact that they only have. email support is not reassuring.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
1. Codefresh has helped us centralize our Release pipeline
2. We have been able to unify our build, test, deploy and maintenance tools into codefresh, reducing complexity and cost.
3. tzhe use of gitOps along with codefresh has significantly reduced developer overhead wrt releases.
4. the proxy logs and config log viewer along with app logs has helped us a lot in debugging during Canary ffailures
2. We have been able to unify our build, test, deploy and maintenance tools into codefresh, reducing complexity and cost.
3. tzhe use of gitOps along with codefresh has significantly reduced developer overhead wrt releases.
4. the proxy logs and config log viewer along with app logs has helped us a lot in debugging during Canary ffailures
There are no comments to display