Monte Carlo Data Observability Platform
Monte Carlo DataReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
461 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Essential Tool for Data Quality and Reliability in Enterprise Environments
What do you like best about the product?
Monte Carlo is fantastic because it provides excellent data observability features that help us track data quality metrics and identify issues quickly. The dashboard is intuitive and easy to navigate for team members.
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing can be steep for smaller teams, and the learning curve for advanced features is somewhat steep. Documentation could be improved in certain areas.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monte Carlo is solving our data quality and reliability issues. It helps us catch data anomalies before they impact our analytics and business decisions. This has significantly reduced the time we spend debugging data pipelines and improved our data team's confidence in our data assets.
Outstanding Experience with This Software
What do you like best about the product?
I like Monte Carlo’s ability to proactively detect data quality issues through automated monitoring and anomaly detection. Its deep integrations with cloud data platforms help improve trust in data and reduce time spent on manual troubleshooting.
What do you dislike about the product?
Initial setup, connection, agent and fine-tuning of monitors can be complex, especially for large or highly customized data environments. Alert noise may occur without proper configuration, and pricing can be challenging as data volume grows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monte Carlo addresses data downtime by monitoring data freshness, volume, and schema changes across pipelines. This helps identify issues proactively, reduces manual checks, and speeds up root-cause analysis when failures occur.
Effortless Alerting, Reliable Performance, Needs More Alert Customization
What do you like best about the product?
I use Monte Carlo for data quality and consistency monitoring. I like that it's very easy to set up alerts and get notified of problems. The product itself has been very stable and consistent, and runs with no issues. We integrate it with our data warehouse (Redshift), Slack, and email. The initial setup was very easy, and even though the cost is somewhat high, I really like the product.
What do you dislike about the product?
I wish there was more nuance around the ability to set conditional alerts, such as 'if this fails 2+ days in a row with the same issue, stop alerting'. The cost is somewhat high.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Monte Carlo for data quality and consistency monitoring; it alerts us via Slack when custom jobs fail, so we don't have to check logs manually.
Effortless Data Monitoring with Powerful ML Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Monte Carlo is relatively easy to set up and integrates well with existing data platforms. The ML-powered monitors are extremely valuable for catching unexpected data anomalies, and the alerting features help us proactively address issues before they affect our business stakeholders.
What do you dislike about the product?
The out-of-box ML-powered monitors can be a bit noisy at the beginning, requiring time and effort to tune the alert sensitivity. It's necessary to mute specific tables or monitors to avoid getting pinged for minor, false positive anomalies. Additionally, while the value of the product is there, the pricing model can be a bit steep, especially for smaller teams just starting their data journey. It would be helpful to see more flexible pricing structures or tiers for small to mid-sized companies.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Monte Carlo for data observability. It monitors data quality with minimal setup, integrates with existing platforms, and its ML-powered monitors catch unknown anomalies. Alerting allows proactive fixes, saving our engineering resources.
AI-Powered Data Observability That Predicts Failures Effortlessly
What do you like best about the product?
The Data observability and the use of AI in order to predict Data Failures.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don´t dislike it because it´s good but the Data Quality Dashboard could be enhanced to be more user friendly, specially for business users, not technical users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Data Quality problems, alerts, indicating where the problem is in order to tackle it faster.
Proactive Data Quality Monitoring That Saves Time
What do you like best about the product?
Monte Carlo gives us end-to-end visibility into data quality across pipelines without needing to manually build monitoring for every table. I like how quickly it surfaces anomalies, schema changes, and freshness issues, and the fact that it integrates well with Snowflake. It saves a ton of time by proactively notifying us before downstream teams are impacted.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some configuration areas still feel a bit “black-box,” meaning it can be hard to understand exactly why certain monitors trigger or why certain tables aren’t automatically covered. The UI can also feel somewhat cluttered at times, and alerting can get noisy until you fully tune everything.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monte Carlo helps us quickly detect data breaks caused by upstream changes, ingestion failures, schema drift, and unexpected drops or spikes in record counts. It also centralizes data quality visibility across our Snowflake environment so the team no longer spends hours manually reconciling data issues or waiting for downstream teams to report problems. This leads to faster root-cause analysis, fewer broken dashboards, and maintains trust in our data products.
Troubleshooting Agent Makes All the Difference
What do you like best about the product?
The troubleshooting agent is super helpful and saves a lot of time
What do you dislike about the product?
We get a lot of false freshness alerts on tables that are sourced from manual updates.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Alerting us to data issues before our customers do.
Best tools for data visualization
What do you like best about the product?
I can see the lineage with Monte Carlo, and also see queries, even if I don't have system advisor access. I can see where my table and which table is being used in dashboards, all from one place. It is easy to use.
What do you dislike about the product?
Yes, there is a problem that when we fine-tune, think about it, data is being deleted and inserted, but we receive alert analysis there. However, it is being deleted and inserted on time, so why is it showing data mismatch?
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Monte Carlo helps us by accessing the data server to check, analyze the model, and understand the impact of editing the models.
Montecarlo Convenient Management, But Needs Clearer Release Details
What do you like best about the product?
I don’t have to manage it’s underlying infrastructure.
What do you dislike about the product?
I am unable to precisely see the changes released for montecarlo cli
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It’s solving data monitoring in my use case
Real-Time Anomaly Detection That Delivers
What do you like best about the product?
Detecting anomalies, and sending real-time alerts
What do you dislike about the product?
During our training sessions with the MC Team, there are several items that aren’t feasible but have workarounds
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Data Analysis
showing 21 - 30