We use UiPath Platform for automation to reduce manual effort in repetitive tasks.

The UiPath Platform has helped reduce manual effort by almost 70%, as there is no manual intervention needed. We use it for both technical and non-technical teams, including the HR team and Learning and Development team. The HR team sends offer letters to new candidates by filling an Excel sheet with the candidate's name, role, probation time, and package, and the UiPath Platform script takes this Excel input to create and send the offer letter to the candidate's email automatically, eliminating the need for HR intervention.

The best features I appreciate about UiPath Platform are its drag and drop activities and the ability to automate and schedule daily tasks with triggers, which eliminates the need for manual effort. For example, the storage team used to log into a device and take the capacity data to send to clients, but we have automated this process using UiPath Platform, scheduling it with Orchestrator, so logging into the device is no longer necessary, and the mail is sent to clients automatically.

I find that the UiPath Platform's selectors sometimes break if the UI changes, which can be a little frustrating. I wish that the selectors would automatically adjust to changes in the UI, as that would be very helpful. Also, I would want the Orchestrator to have a more user-friendly UI to make it easier to find options for scheduling and tracking logs.

I have been using UiPath Platform for the past eight months.

It is stable. I would rate it an eight out of ten for stability.

It is scalable. I would rate it an eight out of ten for scalability.

Approximately five members in our team are familiar with using the UiPath Platform.

I would rate the technical support of UiPath Platform a nine out of ten.

Positive

I only have experience with Automation Anywhere. Compared to Automation Anywhere, the UI of UiPath Platform is different but easier to navigate. I find the drag and drop activities in UiPath Platform to be user-friendly, allowing for the selection of modern activities for advanced automation, while classic activities also suffice for other tasks.

The pricing for the UiPath Platform is reasonable if the company pays for it. There is a community edition available for individuals to learn up to a certain level, but for monitoring and tracking logs, we need the Advanced edition, which is not pricey. If the company covers it, the cost is fine; however, if someone wants to pay for it personally, it can be quite high.

We are considering implementing the AI integration feature in UiPath Platform, but we need more expertise on it. In UiPath Platform, if you have any Python code or API, you need technical expertise on Python scripting to integrate it. Whenever you want to integrate any language with the UiPath Platform, some level of expertise is required.

We deploy the automation using Orchestrator, with UiPath Studio being used for creating workflows. The different editions include Studio for designing automation workflows, Robot for executing processes built in Studio, and Orchestrator for managing and monitoring robots. It takes just one day to deploy automation into the on-premises version of the UiPath Platform. After deployment, we can check the logs the next day to ensure everything is running smoothly.

The solution does not require much maintenance, as any packages automatically update their version, eliminating the need for us to manually update them.

I would definitely recommend UiPath Platform to others because it significantly reduces manual effort. The use of triggers in Orchestrator automates much of the process, and it also provides logs for easy tracking. 

My overall rating for UiPath Platform is nine out of ten.

Our use case involves using the UiPath Platform to automate processes for customers, as I work with different customers. We use it to automate repetitive tasks, such as daily business team tasks that typically take one to two hours.

We have not utilized the AI integration features yet but plan to implement them with the latest version next year. 

We use both attended and unattended automation options in the UiPath Platform. These options have helped in meeting our diverse business needs because before, the business was using manual processes to do tasks, and with attended and unattended automation, they save significant time. We primarily use unattended automation, with customers using it 90% of the time.

The UiPath Platform has improved organizations by saving significant time and money, with approximately 50% return on investment, though this varies by customer.

The analytics in the UiPath Platform help in making decisions, as I am an architect who builds the platform for customers and helps the business team choose which processes will be automated. 

They have free training and it is very easy to use. They provide training through their platform or through partner-led training sessions. Training with a partner in the UiPath Platform takes three days to introduce the platform, while self-paced training takes approximately one to one and a half months. 

In the UiPath Platform, reporting is an area that has room for improvement. I would like to improve reporting by having more detailed information, including logs and robot logs.

I have been using the UiPath Platform for nine years.

The stability of the UiPath Platform is excellent, rating a ten out of ten.

The scalability of the UiPath Platform rates a ten out of ten.

The number of users varies by customer, with one customer having 100 users and another having 200 users. In my organization, I work alone with the UiPath Platform as the architect and process builder, though we have a developer.

The technical support of the UiPath Platform is very active and excellent, deserving a rating of ten out of ten.

Positive

The deployment can be either on-premise or cloud-based, depending on customer preferences. I have deployed it on-premises for nine years. For me, it's easy, but it takes time to deploy it.

A complex architecture can take two to three weeks. A simple architecture can take a few days.

The solution requires minimal maintenance, with major updates annually and minor updates every two months.

The UiPath Platform has saved approximately 50%, though this depends on the customers, with an average 50% return on investment.

It's expensive.

Comparing the UiPath Platform with other automation tools such as Blue Prism, UiPath is significantly better. Power Automate works only with Windows Microsoft products, which is limiting, but the UiPath Platform is the best for automation. Though it is expensive, it remains the superior choice.

I would recommend the UiPath Platform to other users because it is very robust, easy to use, and offers abundant information on the internet along with free training. 

I would rate the UiPath Platform a ten out of ten.

I started with UiPath Platform for evaluation purposes and found it to be effective. We are now using it for processes and Intelligent Document Processing (IDP). These are the two main use cases that I have implemented using UiPath Platform. There are several different scenarios we can implement, and I have used it for both RPA and IDP.

I have used both attended and unattended automation options. The majority of my processes are unattended, but I have developed attended processes as well.

UiPath Platform is a low code solution. It offers a wide variety of activities and integrations with multiple applications, including CRM tools. At the same time, it provides us the flexibility to write our own custom code using features like Invoke Code or languages such as VBA and Python. This means we have the freedom to create our own code while also benefiting from a low code platform that allows us to build solutions based on existing activities.

One of the great things about UiPath Platform is its rapid evolution. This keeps people interested, especially when news breaks that new features are rolling out. Organizations become curious about potential use cases and how they can implement these updates. It’s impressive that they invest so much in improvement because it helps us enhance our offerings to business teams. With a single tool that encompasses a variety of functionalities, we can seamlessly integrate and address multiple problems simultaneously.

UiPath Platform is evolving and continuously adding new features. When I started, UiPath Platform was straightforward and easy to learn, even easy to implement because every function or predefined action, called an activity, was self-cleared and self-explanatory regarding its function, input, output format, and capabilities. They are currently implementing AI in every single product of theirs.

It is currently becoming somewhat complicated because AI is good, but too much of everything might spoil the dish. They are trying to evolve or include AI features everywhere, which could be challenging because I am not able to find proper use cases for each product having AI. Until we have specific use cases, we would not be able to use it effectively, and this also complicates the development and environment. This is one concern I have currently, though they might have other perspectives while developing this. My personal view is that involving AI in every product might be premature until we find actual use cases.

The AI integration is promising. We can utilize AI across various applications. We have autopilot functions, auto-healing capabilities, and now they’ve introduced IXP, which stands for Intelligent Access and Processing using AI. Additionally, we have communication mining for large language models (LLMs), which is a significant advancement. While it's good that we are leveraging AI to tackle problems, I do have concerns about relying too heavily on AI without fully understanding its actual usage. There’s a trend to incorporate AI into everything, even basic RPA tasks. That’s something to keep in mind.

My primary concern is related to the lack of clear use cases for AI technologies. I am a fan of AI and actively use it, but without proper use cases, its applications can seem unproductive. As we introduce these tools, their complexity tends to increase, and without defined scenarios for implementation, it becomes challenging to adapt to the technology effectively. Currently, new features are being rolled out, but we lack comprehensive insights into how to set them up and utilize them effectively. It would be helpful to understand the specific scenarios where we can apply these tools. If I had access to relevant use cases, I would be able to leverage AL tools more effectively. When new products are offered, it's essential that the providers also include use cases, training, and documentation to fill this information gap.

I have been using UiPath Platform for around seven to eight years.

The downtime for UiPath Platform is very minimal. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

For bugs, I would give a rating of around eight and a half. While they may not have many bugs, there could be better documentation. They offer a wide range of features, so having proper documentation and clear configurations is very important. 

Scalability is good for UiPath Platform. I would rate it a nine out of ten.

My organization works only on RPA solutions, so about 80% to 90% people are working with UiPath Platform. The client we are working with has a very small team of two to three developers.

Initially, their support was great, but now, since they are catering to a larger number of customers, I learned that they have different support plans. This means that support can be provided via email or phone, depending on the support plan you purchase from them. For resolving any issues, I believe it would be more effective to discuss matters over a call rather than through emails.

I am uncertain if they are fully aware of how this shift has affected their support quality. In the past, it seemed there were no different support plans, but now there are. I'm not sure about the cost differences either, but I would prefer comprehensive support for those who are paying for it.

There are instances where I encounter configuration issues that aren't well documented or where I face understanding gaps. Coming from a technical background, I often find that certain configurations need to be handled by the infrastructure team. In those situations, getting assistance from the support team would be much easier if we could arrange a call rather than relying on email exchanges.

Positive

With cloud infrastructure, they manage the entire application environment themselves. In contrast, on-premises setups are more complex, as we need to deploy multiple applications that require integration. This approach also comes with certain limitations, particularly regarding the use of large language models (LLMs) and AI technologies. Therefore, deploying solutions on the cloud is generally easier compared to managing them on-premises, which can be a bit more challenging.

I have been using their cloud solution for the last four to five years, but the Orchestrator is on-premises.

In terms of maintenance, an RPA solution requires ongoing maintenance, especially when applications are updated, formatting changes, or processes are modified. Various factors can necessitate upgrading or maintaining RPA systems. However, if there are no external impacts on the process, inputs, or outputs, the system can run smoothly for an extended period—possibly for a year or more—without issues or significant maintenance. Dependent applications, such as third-party applications, which are outside the control of RPA, can impact the process. Changes or updates to these external applications can indeed impact the overall process.

I'm not heavily involved in pricing, but I know that license prices are continuously increasing. The cost often depends on the organization and the number of licenses purchased, with larger purchases generally resulting in lower costs. This can lead to savings on extra expenses, especially since providers are now offering solutions as a service. For smaller organizations that may not have the infrastructure to support complex setups, using tools directly on UiPath Cloud can be a viable option. This strategic approach seems to be well thought out by the providers.

My experience with various tools leads me to believe that UiPath is significantly ahead of its competitors. They invest a lot of resources into continuously evolving and upgrading their products, especially with the incorporation of AI technology, which is a hot topic right now.

However, it's important to note that your choice of tools depends on your specific needs. For basic Robotic Process Automation (RPA), there are multiple vendors available that may offer more affordable options, including some open-source tools in the market.

When it comes to Intelligent Document Processing (IDP), there are also numerous vendors to consider. Ultimately, what matters most is your priorities and requirements. UiPath stands out in the market due to its comprehensive suite of solutions, which includes RPA, testing tools, IDP tools, Intelligent Process Automation (IPA), process mining tools, and communication mining tools. This wide range of offerings can greatly aid organizations in their digital transformation journeys. Therefore, UiPath is a leading choice for RPA products.

UiPath Insights is a valuable feature. Recently, they introduced UiPath Maestro, which I believe is focused on BPMN processes. For analytics, there are tools for communication mining and process mining. However, I haven't worked with any specific analytics tools yet. While UiPath does provide various insights, I wouldn't say there’s a dedicated analytics tool that I've used.

I would recommend it depending on the use case. If you are looking for an enterprise-level or full end-to-end solution for your automation journey, you should consider UiPath Platform. However, if you only need individual functionality like Robotic Process Automation (RPA), you can choose any other RPA vendor. If you have a significant pipeline of tasks to automate or a variety of processes that require automation, UiPath Platform is an excellent option. It provides robust integration capabilities and can handle multiple use cases. Conversely, if the focus is on a specific problem and there are budget constraints, opting for another vendor might be more suitable.

I would rate UiPath Platform an eight out of ten.

In eight years, I have done many different things with the UiPath Platform. I work as a software developer with the UiPath Platform in the insurance industry.

The UiPath Platform has helped meet diverse business needs. It helps in every way possible. Whatever use case I receive, I have always been able to perform with the UiPath Platform.

The best feature of UiPath Platform is that it is platform agnostic; it's an environment where you do not need to be dependent on any platform. The analytics dashboard enables us to showcase what has been done and what has not been done with the UiPath Platform.

There are a few areas in the UiPath Platform that could be improved. The OCR technology needs improvement, particularly for reading invoices, especially scanned invoices.

I have eight years of experience with the UiPath Platform.

The UiPath Platform is stable, which contributes to their continued success.

The UiPath Platform is definitely scalable, which contributes to their continued success.

The customer service and technical support for UiPath Platform are good. They are very quick to respond, and they have a strong support community.

Negative

The initial setup for UiPath Platform was pretty easy, though it depends on the organization.

The setup process depends on your network configuration and how you need to set up the Orchestrator, whether in the cloud or not. For a smaller organization, it could be quick, while for a larger scale organization, it might take longer. Security issues must also be considered. Implementation can take anywhere from a day for a single user to months for setting up a COE.

We have a team of 20 plus people involved with the deployment of UiPath Platform. The team is servicing an enterprise-level organization.

The UiPath Platform definitely helps improve efficiency. It helps save money, reduce time, and reduce errors, though this varies from process to process. These benefits cannot always be quantified as they differ across various processes from small to large. Sometimes the gains are non-materialistic, making them difficult to quantify.

Licensing for UiPath Platform is overly costly, particularly for an unattended bot. They should reduce the pricing to compete with Microsoft Power Automate.

Microsoft provides many different features, which is where UiPath Platform needs to focus its competition. The UiPath Platform has more years of experience and is more robust, working seamlessly with various applications. Power Automate currently has many issues to address, though they perform better in Microsoft environments.

I would rate UiPath Platform nine out of ten overall.

At the moment, we are using UiPath Platform to automate manual processes inside finance. I work in the finance domain. We identify mundane, redundant, operational processes, which could be report automations, in general, some small end-to-end process automations. We generally do not have any developers inside the company, but we recruited an external consultancy that does UiPath automation. Generally, we act as a solution architect and a business analyst and a project manager, and they are the ones who are the developers.

We use the UiPath Platform to automate processes that deal with a good cause that our company is involved in. We are still doing it very slowly with a very small budget. But we are gradually scaling up year upon year.

It technically started off as a use surplus budget initiative where we had some additional budget, and we wanted to do some process optimizations. Now the overall company is going through some operational improvements and digital transformation initiatives. As a part of that lean transformation, we are currently doing such optimizations across all domains. In our domain in finance, we have chosen UiPath Platform as a way of automating and improving because usually we have a lot of tech teams, but it is very difficult to find a roadmap for automating such smaller processes. Having a tool makes it easier to do it either via regular developers or citizen developer initiatives.

UiPath Platform enables us to implement end-to-end automation.

It is very important from a process point of view because we usually have some shortage in resources and if we do half of the process instead of an end-to-end process, then there needs to be a process owner who needs to be responsible for it, which we do not want to maintain. We want to eliminate the need for those resources and have the process end-to-end be done by bots. It is fairly important for us.

The user community for the UiPath Platform is probably one of the most active and very helpful. Every time I have some blockers or some questions, I usually just log into the user community and post a question. More often than not, I get an answer. If one of my developers encounters such scenarios, I would say it is a great user community.

We use the vendor's UiPath Academy courses. I go through the academy courses a lot because I am not from that background or fully familiar with it. We have an external consultancy that helps us. They are very aware of the UiPath Platform and the features and everything and they stay up to date, but for me to stay up to date with the features or the capabilities of the tools and what else to learn, I generally use the academy courses a lot and they are really helpful.

I am a fan of UiPath Platform, so I would not have a lot of complaints about it. I attend a lot of the UiPath seminars and conventions as well. I am yet to explore the AI functionalities of the UiPath Platform. I am really looking forward to doing that. At the moment, we are also looking for some chatbots and such functionalities, especially for our internal documentation, internal Confluence, and all those things.

We are also looking to see more OCR-related features with the UiPath Platform. We have several invoices related to jobs in finance, especially with accounts payable, receivable, etc. Scanning the invoices, being able to interpret the data with the highest possible accuracy, and standardizing those formats is a whole other project which we are looking to do in the upcoming months. That is going to be an interesting project with the UiPath Platform.

It has been two years now since I have been using the UiPath Platform.

Two years ago, when we were onboarding this, I did a comprehensive survey and researched UiPath Platform versus Automation Anywhere versus Blue Prism. We had conversations with all three suppliers where we invited our Vice President of our domain and our Head of Department, myself, and we had meetings with all three of them where they presented about their product, their pricing, all the other things, the general functionalities, their clients, etc. 

The thing that sold us most on UiPath Platform was probably their client stories, the other users who had adopted UiPath, and how easy it was to deploy automations and how quick it was. 

We knew from the product point of view that Blue Prism was more sturdy in terms of automations, and Automation Anywhere was more bug-free. The license was a little bit cheaper than UiPath Platform for Automation Anywhere. We were sold primarily with UiPath Platform because of the other client stories and we found some similarities between our product and the client's product. We found a lot of similarities in the way the operations were running between our company and their companies. We thought it could be a good learning or it could be an easy transition to onboard this kind of a tool into our company after it had already had some success in their companies.

We do save with the UiPath Platform. We are still in the process of getting back the ROI of what we invested in developing. I would still say that in a matter of two to three years, or even less than that, probably, we would be there. We have seen positive results, and that is the reason we are also interested in scaling it up year upon year.

We are using the UiPath Platform for our own organization at the moment, and it does save a lot of time. A significant amount of money goes into the development process as well because we are partnering with an external consultancy, and they charge per hour to develop. Some amount of money or budget goes into the development process. For us, ROI calculations are based on the savings that the automation provides and how long it takes for us to, after still paying the license, maintain the automation, and how much time it takes for us to get back the budget which we put into the development effort. Once all that is done, it goes into further savings. Some of the processes have already started yielding the savings, but some of them are yet to yield the benefits, and that probably will be done in the next 6 to 12 months or even in the future with the UiPath Platform.

At the moment, the licensing cost of the UiPath Platform is still acceptable in terms of it does not feel too much. We are able to get the ROI because the development effort is also less. The license cost is probably a bit higher, but the amount of time that goes into development is also less. When we go into the development of an automation with the UiPath Platform, all we care about is deploying it as soon as possible because we also want to give the client, our stakeholders, some quick wins, especially given that the project is in the beginner phase. Quick wins go a long way to getting some people behind us in growing the project, growing the initiative. 

From a licensing cost point of view, it is manageable. As we grow more and more, and we need to buy more licenses, I think the cost might grow in a very high pace. We need to look for efficient utilization of each bot's timing, because the bots can work 24/7. It is about optimizing the utilization of each bot. That is going to be a very useful conversation. My overall thoughts regarding the licensing cost of UiPath Platform is that it is a bit more expensive solution compared to others.

On a scale of 1 to 10, maybe 7 to 8 is my assessment of the ease of building automations using the UiPath Platform.

We maintain the UiPath Platform in the cloud. We are a cloud-based company. We prefer doing everything cloud instead of on-premises.

We have Microsoft Azure as our cloud provider for the UiPath Platform.

It is private when it comes to the type of cloud for the UiPath Platform.

Until now, we have not used the solution's AI functionality in our automation program with the UiPath Platform, but now we are thinking of exploring the AI capabilities as well.

That is one of the reasons we chose the UiPath Platform, because certain processes that were there at the company have been very manual and time-consuming and even error-prone. We wanted to reduce the errors, mainly because in finance, there is so much compliance. In order to do all that, improving the compliance also saves us a lot of additional costs sometimes, because in finance ,there are penalties for breaching compliance. Helping doing these automations with the UiPath Platform also improves the compliance, it helps improve the speed of completing the process. Those are obvious advantages of an automation tool. It does help speed up the digital transformation initiative for us.

That is why we went with the objective of end-to-end process automation with the UiPath Platform because previously we had certain departments where there were employees who were switching quite a lot, leaving the company or so and the onboarding process was not very comprehensive, or it was done in a very urgent manner. In such cases, some processes fall through the roof, and no one is maintaining them correctly. We wanted to get rid of the resources in such departments, especially and completely end-to-end automate it using bots with the UiPath Platform. When we do that, we have successfully been able to deploy two or three such processes where we now do not need a human in the loop at all. That means also that the process gets done in an automated way without any errors. We also have some report automations which we did with UiPath Platform, and they get done now in one-hundredth of the time that it used to be done before and without any errors. There are certain cases where there would be errors, but we have to code accordingly for edge case scenarios, outliers. For such outliers, we needed to code them into the automation, but at least we are able to handle the errors, which is a good thing.

The projects are still in a very initial phase. It has been two years, but we are still working with the same number of licenses and bots that we bought two years ago. We are doing a very few number of automations at the moment. We are looking to ramp it up in 2026 at least. At the moment, it is quite spread out, and the whole process of getting stakeholders to buy in, spreading the awareness about automation and UiPath Platform. It is still in a very early stage, which is why exactly how much employee effort is being saved is still a far-fetched idea at the moment.

I would give the UiPath Platform an 8 at the moment as an overall rating.

My current use cases for the UiPath Platform include web development, web automation, desktop automations, and using document understanding, along with PDF automation using document understanding.

The most favorite feature in the UiPath Platform is the document understanding, and I appreciate the ability to automate the web part when applications do not have API access. The document understanding feature is based on ML technology, which extracts fields from a PDF document even when they are semi-structured or unstructured, based on the training models.

I use the UiPath Platform overall, including UiPath Studio and everything associated with it. Knowledge without scripting helps my colleagues who do not have any experience with scripting, as the UiPath Platform allows basic automation without requiring such knowledge. For some complex automations, we can integrate with VBScript and Python scripts if necessary, however, initial automation does not require in-depth programming knowledge.

There is scope for improvement in the UiPath Platform, particularly with the Web Studio feature that has been launched recently. They could enhance the object repository feature, which allows maintaining selectors externally, as there are challenges associated with changes in selectors that require updating the library and the version in the code. The Web Studio works when there are APIs involved, but it could be made more user-friendly and developer-friendly. It currently works only in cases where it is not dependent on a machine.

My total experience with the UiPath Platform is around 4.5 years.

Crashing from the tool end is very rare; only during upgrades might some issues arise. Overall, the occurrence is minimal. Proper exception handling in the code also ensures a low exception rate.

For technical support, I would rate it around eight or seven out of ten, mostly leaning towards seven plus. Most of the time, when we reach out, we have calls with the UiPath team, and we usually end up finding the solution or alternative methods.

Positive

I have used Power Automate as well. In Power Automate, it's easy to integrate with all Microsoft applications because it has direct integrations where all you need to do is change the URLs and authentication part, making it very simple to integrate with SharePoint or any Microsoft product. I also have basic insights into Automation Anywhere.

The initial deployment using the UiPath Platform was actually easy. Everything is organized in UiPath, and there is a forum available for support where users can post questions and get replies. The courses are also well-structured, making it easy for beginners to understand.

I took around two weeks to learn the basics of UiPath automation since I come from a CSE background.

The number of people required for this type of deployment depends on the timelines and project length. A basic UiPath bot would typically require one person for development.

I don't have any insights into the licensing at the enterprise level.

When considering alternatives to the UiPath Platform, options we looked into include any scripting language or similar solutions.

I have used the AI integration features of the UiPath Platform, specifically the integration concept with the LLM model where we provide a prompt to get results that we extract and send over email. This is typically used to analyze resumes for our HR team, which receives numerous resumes. Using the AI integration concept in the UiPath Platform, we read resumes uploaded to the LLM model, extract relevant data, and filter out the necessary resumes. 

I rate the UiPath Platform a nine out of ten, based on my experience compared to Power Automate and basic knowledge of Automation Anywhere. I've found UiPath to be well-organized and well-structured for beginners.

I mostly use the UiPath Platform for robotic automation.

We use both attended and unattended automation options within the UiPath Platform. The unattended automation is good, but we have some performance issues with some of the systems we are working on. However, it fulfills the purpose for our work.

The best features I appreciate about the UiPath Platform include the ability to enable some components to be used, as well as the dashboards for logging and the bots' performance after deployment. It is also easy to use.

I assess the impact of the analytic capabilities on my decision-making process positively, as we provide this for customers running their business to see how much they're saving on efficiency or I advise them on the best use cases to invest in.

We haven't worked much with AI features, but I am looking for some features there. Overall, it provides us with what we need the most. 

They can perhaps make the customizations and configurations for reuse easier for the developers, as it would help to expedite things.

I have about four or five years of experience.

We do not have downtime with the UiPath Platform, although we may have some minor issues or unhandled exceptions, but it's fine. I can say that we do not have downtime. I would rate the stability of the UiPath Platform as a nine out of ten.

The UiPath Platform is fulfilling the purpose so far. We don't have issues.

In my organization, around 150 specialists work with the UiPath Platform. Most of our clients are enterprises in care services or telecommunication.

I would rate the UiPath Platform's technical support an eight out of ten.

Positive

I didn't do its deployment myself, but from the feedback I get from the team, it's fine. It's not complex.

For my clients, the average deployment time is days.

It is based on the use case. If the use case needs several bots, it gets expensive.

I find the UiPath Platform much more efficient and easier than Blue Prism, and it offers many more features than Power Automate, so it strikes a perfect balance.

I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.

Clients usually use UiPath Platform for the automation of use cases in departments like HR, Finance, and IT support.

UiPath Platform can handle very complex processes. We have implemented various complex use cases using UiPath, and they are performing very well.

UiPath Platform integrates with several systems, whether they are ERP systems such as Oracle or SAP, as well as other systems.

UiPath Platform utilizes AI features. They recently released a new platform called Agentic Automation, which exposes AI and RPA in one platform, making it something fresh and new.

The most important features of the UiPath Platform are the UI automation capabilities and Document Understanding.

UiPath Platform is doing a good job with enhancements; they are releasing new features almost every six months. However, I would recommend that they improve their ability to be a low-code, no-code platform, as this would be a great feature for their platform.

I have been working with UiPath Platform for about six years.

I would rate UiPath Platform's support a seven out of ten. They need to work on improving their response time for open tickets and handling complex support cases, as I have seen some cases take a very long time to troubleshoot and get to the source of the problems. Therefore, they need to improve their response time as well as increase the teams in their support team, especially when handling complex support cases.

Neutral

Deploying UiPath Platform takes a couple of weeks.

The price of UiPath Platform in the Middle East region is a little bit high; having a lower price for the Middle East region would make it more attractive.

It suits big enterprise customers. However, if the customer is of medium to smaller size, UiPath Platform may not be a suitable choice.

It is an expensive tool. When compared to competition, such as Microsoft's Power Automate platform or IBM Cloud Pak, UiPath is expensive. Both of them are much lower in terms of pricing than the UiPath Platform, so they need to consider this in the enterprise scheme.

I would rate UiPath Platform a nine out of ten.

The UiPath Platform is used to automate business processes, mainly task automation and process automation that requires manual repetitive tasks. It is similar to Blue Prism, with additional integration capabilities such as Salesforce, CRM, and a better ecosystem. It is a low code, no code development tool for rule-based process automation.

The UiPath Platform helps enable end-to-end automation, but it is not suitable for all processes. The product is designed for rule-based automation. The machine follows the same instructions every time to automate manual repetitive work. If your pathway changes, considering the difference between deterministic versus non-deterministic or stochastic automation, the UiPath Platform is more deterministic. It performs the same exact actions every time. If the work requires different paths each time with dynamic decision-making capabilities, you would need to look beyond the UiPath Platform or integrate it with AI agents.

Some of the most valuable features of the UiPath Platform are its ease of use. It is low code, no code, and they are the leader in RPA software. They have a head start in integrating agent automation into their framework. There is agent process automation, which is still yet to be proven, but they are making progress compared to other RPA providers who are not as advanced as the UiPath Platform in terms of their agent adoption.

The areas where the UiPath Platform could be improved are in how most companies are adopting agent-tech AI. We will have to monitor how they are integrating it with agent-tech AI. Based on the literature, the UiPath Platform is taking concrete action, as they released their agent-tech framework last week. It is very difficult, so we will need to assess that and see how the product evolves into the agent-tech feature API integration.

I have about two years of experience with the UiPath Platform.

I have dealt with the support and customer service at the UiPath Platform. They are very comparable. Blue Prism got acquired, but the UiPath Platform remains its own entity and is growing compared to its two main competitors, Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere.

The UiPath Platform has a strong user community. It is very adept and has extensive training available. The user community is mature, and users receive proper support from the community to complete their work.

Positive

At my previous company, we used Blue Prism extensively because it was our standard product. We evaluated the UiPath Platform but did not use it for any use case implementation. We used it only for comparison and analysis purposes. We had already decided to use one tool, so we never saw the value of adding another RPA tool within the organization.

The UiPath Platform helps reduce human error. When a task needs to be done by 10 people, those individuals might do things differently. If a human has to enter data, they may mistype or forget something. These tasks can be automated. It can be integrated with auto-correction and auto-population of the screens presented to the digital worker. Over time, as automation matures, errors can be fixed, ensuring consistency or improvement in work processes. Every transaction is processed with the same exact logic or steps configured, which helps bring consistency and reduces human errors over time.

The UiPath Platform saves costs for organizations, saving about 30 to 50% per business process. When comparing to manual processing, if 10 people were needed before automating the process with the UiPath Platform or Blue Prism, it can be reduced to three to four people per process, resulting in huge savings in manual effort.

The UiPath Platform speeds up digital transformation and reduces its cost. For simple processes that are well-defined and have significant manual effort, automation can be implemented, which reduces costs. Machines are more cost-effective than humans. From that perspective, it reduces the operational costs of business processes.

The main differences between Blue Prism and the UiPath Platform are that UiPath is easier to learn based on my research. There is abundant material available, and it has many out-of-the-box integrations, allowing for more operational capabilities. Blue Prism is solid but became stagnant around 2017-2018 when focus shifted toward the UiPath Platform. Blue Prism was once the leader, but since 2018, the UiPath Platform has improved. I haven't used the UiPath Platform extensively to provide a firsthand assessment, so my knowledge comes mainly from literature.

I do not use the agent-tech automation with any platforms. The agent-tech is a new feature within the UiPath Platform, and they started integrating it in the last six months. I have not seen their offering, but based on documentation, they have developed a framework for agent development and automation integration.

Regarding the ease of building automations using the UiPath Platform, end users still need some specialist skills to build. It is not as end-user friendly as some other tools, but it does not require deep technical knowledge. It is low code, no code, and everything is drag and drop. Configuration management using their studio is effective.

The UiPath Platform does not necessarily replace existing systems but connects to different systems already in place. It creates a layer on top that reduces the need for human intervention, enabling machines and robots to do most of the work.

The time saved due to the UiPath Platform depends on the employee. It reduces the workload for end users whose work is now performed by robots. The saved time can be used for other tasks. When processes have seasonal variance, such as quarterly, monthly, or year-end processing, the transaction volume increases, so workload can be better managed by adjusting digital workers.

I rate the UiPath Platform an eight out of ten.

My use case for their products is the regular automation use cases, and I am trying with some Gen AI use cases.

The most valuable functions in UiPath would be that it's easily integrated with multiple applications. The cost is annual. It's not based on transactions for the products.

It has good documentation that we can follow. 

It's also easily built; you can do it with low-code/no-code, making it quite simple to build. Some coding experience is needed, however, if you are good at it, it's a good tool to use.

UiPath provides a scalable solution and well-secured. Since we are on SaaS, we have more flexibility, and because we know the products, we can evangelize about it. It's quite user-friendly, scalable, and secure, so that's good for us.

The solution helps reduce human error.

It saves employee time absolutely. When we automate manual or recurring tasks, employees have free time, so they are looking at picking up other creative tasks instead of doing redundant ones.

For UiPath maintenance, I give it ten out of ten.

We use the Academy for courses. I do use UiPath Academy courses; we study from that, however, learning doesn't stop.

The UiPath user community is fantastic. We get to learn a lot about various solutions, and gain access to a good knowledge base. There's nothing particularly special from an evangelization perspective. The MVPs do have access to product support, and from them, you can get most of the information coming out in the community. The community is quite engaging, and we do get to know each other a lot in terms of solutions.

There is a drawback that the new products getting launched are not well documented, and the information only sits with the product team, not with the support team. That is where they are falling apart.

They should focus on the customer needs as their license cost is currently quite large. Compared to Microsoft, their cost is too much for automation, and their support has not been up to the mark. The customer-centric focus has reduced; they're more towards licensing and getting new sales, new business. They cannot maintain the existing products once delivered.

Regarding additional functionality for UiPath, I believe that additional features will only come into play when you start talking to the customers, accept feedback, and work on it. I haven't experienced that, so honestly, my answer is negative. The product needs a lot of enhancements, and whenever we get a chance, we share feedback with the UiPath insider program.

I have been working with UiPath for almost five, six years now.

I'd rate stability ten out of ten.

In terms of scalability, I rate it ten out of ten.

Technical support is good. They should know more about the technicalities of the product. That can be lacking. 

Positive

I don't use Automation Anywhere anymore. I moved to UiPath. I'm also familiar with Microsoft, which is cheaper.

The initial setup for UiPath was simple.

We have used a UiPath integrator.

In my opinion, if both UiPath and Automation Anywhere solutions are available for me to work with, Automation Anywhere is a history, and UiPath is a modern tool.

We do not yet use the agentic automation device? It is quite nascent. I don't know why people are falling for it. Agentic automation end-to-end still does not exist. It exists with big, big, big, big players like Salesforce. There are certain OpenAI tools which give you end-to-end big automation. What UiPath is giving as of now is agent building and now agentic, which is still in a preview mode. So it's not generally available. 

The solution reads messages in real-time and predicts what could be the type of a message; that is what Comms Mining does.

Comms Mining doesn't prioritize the messages. Its job is to identify the emails, categorize them, and label them as per the training provided by humans. It categorizes unstructured data such as emails with the right type, helping the end user or downstream automation work on it. It can work on IT tickets, emails, chats, and so on.

We don't trust the monitoring capability of Comms Mining; it's not up to the mark. I'd rate it six out of ten. So, we have built our own Power BI dashboard, looking at logs from bots as well as Comms Mining, and we're doing our own analysis and insights. However, their training GUI is quite helpful since it tells you which labels are underperforming and which labels need action if the F1 score has decreased.

The solution enables me to implement end-to-end automation under certain conditions.

If I evaluate UiPath as a total product, I would give it an eight out of ten.