I run my own IT company where we work with multiple products. Nowadays, we are not doing a lot of Ping Identity Platform projects because there are other technologies like Ping and Okta and other options available which are better than Oracle. That is why we don't have a lot of Oracle projects these days.

We are working mostly with Ping technology and ForgeRock, and we do have some Oracle projects that we are running, but majorly we are running Ping and ForgeRock.

Ping Identity Platform can provide a solution for both workforce identity and access management and also for consumer identity and access management, which is CIAM.

There are many things that are better in Ping Identity Platform. First, it is a very lightweight product. Second, I would say it's a converged platform which can do both identity management, access management, and recently they are bringing privilege management capability as well. Another thing is that they also have something very unique, which is their user interface-based journeys, which provides their single sign-on experience. That is a very good thing. Ping Identity Platform also supports all the latest features such as passwordless and managing agentic identity. They also have AI capabilities within the product itself.

They provide out-of-box almost all the MFA options, including email OTP, text-based OTP, TOTP, HOTP, biometric, and passwordless. They can also integrate with any third-party MFA provider. From that perspective, it's a complete platform.

They support OAuth and OpenID. They also have this product called Ping Gateway, which you can use to implement API security. It provides features such as throttling, adding authentication, or everything you can do as part of Ping Gateway.

From the improvement perspective, they could bring IGA capability, which right now they only have in their SaaS offering. Other than that, Ping Identity Platform has multiple products for access management, identity management, a solution for API security, a solution for authorization, and a product for identity verification. From that perspective, it is complete, and they are improving it.

I think a nine.

Ping Identity Platform can be compared with any other leader in the identity and access management space, but I would say it would be high because they have been the leader in all the analytics reports, whether it's Gartner or KuppingerCole or any other reports.

I would say Okta, and Okta and IBM from that perspective. IBM and even Oracle could be alternatives, but Oracle is a dying technology at this point in time.

Ping Identity Platform has some analytic capability, but mostly it produces the logs which can be sent to any external SIEM tools such as QRadar or Grafana or anything similar. It basically produces the logs which can be consumed by any analytics tool.

It is very easy to integrate.

They have been the leader for the last eight or nine years according to Gartner and KuppingerCole or any other analyst reports.

I would rate Ping Identity Platform at a ten. Overall, I would rate my experience between nine and ten. My overall review rating for Ping Identity Platform is nine.