I haven't used Zoom for personal meetings, but we used to use it at my university. A few of our clients also use Zoom, so they connect with us through it. I have a bit of experience with Zoom, but I haven't used it extensively.

I haven't been using Zoom in my organization. A few of our clients also use it.

Just for online classes. I think we can skip the interview for Zoom because I haven't used it for anything other than online classes.

Overall, the UI was fine. Performance was fine. Everything was good. I had no problems for the time I was using it.

Maybe the UI could be improved a bit. Plus, it would be helpful if all the chat history was maintained, even between calls. If I'm chatting during a call, I'd like that chat to be available later.

Zoom have some control over the number of users who can interact at a single time, but I'm not sure about the specifics.

I have experience with this product.

It is a stable product. I haven't faced any issues. Maybe our network stability was the issue sometimes. But Zoom itself is always stable.

I've been in a call with around a thousand students. So, it was quite scalable.

I haven't used Zoom's tech support.

We use Teams professionally. Personally, I've only used Zoom a couple of times.

I still prefer Teams because I'm used to it. Teams is the perfect solution if you want to collaborate on an enterprise level. I don't know if it's more expensive than Zoom, but overall, I love Teams.

I think using Teams makes more sense for me. I can create a group there, and I have access to all the tabs. Teams are better for meetings.

Zoom setup is pretty much straightforward. I've always used Zoom through Chrome, so we didn't need to deploy it. But the overall cloud setup wasn't a challenge. It's very straightforward.

There was just one guy who has to create the calls and pay the bill. Just a single admin.

Everything was fine. But I would rate it a six out of ten.

It was an enterprise subscription primarily intended for tech companies supporting us. We mainly used Zoom, and at some point, our management also acquired a Zoom subscription specifically for manager meetings.

It has been rolling out exciting features that enhance collaboration and simplify meeting scheduling and management. Zoom was quite effective until a security issue arose, which caused some users to leave. However, they quickly addressed the problem, which can happen with any technology. Overall, Zoom has introduced many features that align well with current market needs for meetings and collaboration.

Important features include whiteboard control, the ability to set up lobbies, and managing how attendees join the meeting.

The pricing model for Zoom was not very friendly.

I have been using Zoom for last ten years.

Zoom is very stable and it's also very lightweight. It really doesn't consume a lot of bandwidth.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

The initial setup was easy and takes 10 minutes to complete.

To deploy, the first thing is subscription, so you have to go and register. Then once you're registered, it’ll send an activation link. Once you activate you download Zoom, log in, and move on.

When evaluating return on investment, two key factors come to mind. First is having ample storage, which allows you to share and retain meeting information for future reference, making it a valuable asset. Second is pricing, which is crucial for aligning the solution with your budget and ensuring it offers good value for the cost.

For those seeking a versatile option, Zoom is a strong competitor in the market. While there are many products to explore, Zoom stands out as a solid choice. It offers excellent security features, including comprehensive controls for connections, streaming, recording, and sharing information. Since addressing a previous breach, Zoom has maintained robust security. Overall, its security support is commendable, and it continues to be a reliable solution

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

I use the solution for personal meetings where I have discussions with outside people.

The solution is easy to set up and use. I feel Zoom is stable for the kind of requirement I have. The solution provides good video quality. Zoom has good screen-sharing and presentation capabilities.

Zoom should introduce AI features that allow you to understand a person's emotions.

I have been using Zoom for many years.

I rate the solution’s stability an eight out of ten.

The solution’s initial setup is easy.

Overall, I rate the solution an eight out of ten.

We use the solution for our daily meetings.

Some of our people work from home, and some work from the office. The tool supports our hybrid work environment. It works well. We meet using Zoom. It is useful for collaboration within the team. The performance is perfect. The video quality is good compared to other products. The sound quality is also good. We do not face any problems. The screen-sharing capabilities are very good.

We want to use the tool for webinars, but the license is very expensive. The price must be improved.

I have been using the solution for two years.

The stability is perfect. I rate the stability a nine out of ten. The placement of some of the options on the screen can be improved.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten. We have approximately 100 users, including managers, engineers, and developers. We use it regularly.

The setup is straightforward. The solution can be installed in a minute. We just have one file for installation. We can install it easily.

The solution helps us conduct remote meetings quickly.

We pay a yearly licensing fee.

I will recommend the product to others. The tool is very useful for daily meetings. It is a very good product. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

Our primary use case for Zoom is meeting with business partners and other organizations.

The solution has been valuable in facilitating remote communication and collaboration during the pandemic when physical meetings were impossible.

The product's stability needs improvement.

We have been using Zoom for one and a half years.

I rate the product's stability an eight out of ten. There is always room for improvement.

The product is scalable.

I have used Microsoft Teams earlier.

The platform is easy to deploy.

Zoom was free and adopted by most organizations for business communication during the pandemic.

I rate it an eight out of ten.

The video quality has improved a lot since we first started using Zoom. There were some issues in the beginning, but many of them have been sorted out now. The company's history is evolving; many improvements were made when Zoom first became the go-to for helping people do remote meetings. The audio quality has also improved. We had big issues at the beginning where the audio would either stutter or you couldn't hear someone.

Zoom helps you to share your screen and allows someone to take remote control during Zoom meetings. Compared with other platforms like Teams and Webex, it's on par.

One of the key features is the transcription function. Zoom can automatically transcribe the conversation and save it once it's complete. Also, the conversation recording can be done automatically, stored, and referenced later. So if someone took a call, spoke to someone, and said, 'I told them this and this,' I, as an admin, can go in and listen to that recorded conversation, validate that point, and have a little bit of the transcript to review.

The solution could be cheaper.

I have been using Zoom for a couple of years.

We've had a couple of issues. Sometimes, the phones drop out or upgrade the handset during a period of time, and then that handset is unavailable until the update is complete. There could be configuration issues.

25 users use Zoom daily, particularly technicians who perform on-site tasks. Their Howell phone serves as their primary communication tool. For internal calls received via the Zoom app, they promptly respond. Similarly, if a salesperson is on-site and an incoming call rings the office number while no one is present, they will likely answer and represent the company. Zoom is extensively used and is a vital tool within the business, upon which they heavily rely.

Microsoft Teams is an alternative. People would have an Office 365 subscription and pay for Teams anyway. Many customers use Microsoft Teams because they're already paying for the license to use Outlook or Office.

The initial setup is straightforward but requires time, depending on your setup. We use Zoom for our phone calls. We will go through the steps to record the answering of the call and the options and then address any doubts. If you're going to set it up, you need to invest at least half a day to a day to configure all that stuff and have it work. Once you do it, it's done. You don't have to do it again. It is pretty easy to navigate and configure. You don't need to reference many manuals or instructions to achieve that.

They use a licensing model based on a per-user basis for enterprise rather than per version or end device. For example, one user logging in from a handset can also log in from a phone, and it's still technically under the same license. You can be at an office, use a desk phone, and then leave the office while still running the Zoom app on the phone using the same license.

Zoom has a high price point. Newer alternatives are coming with low prices.

If you want to start up quickly and get everything configured, Zoom is a good option. If you're a new startup or business and need a business line with an operator and all the backing of a company that answers phones and can send you to different extensions, Zoom is a good option to pick up and deploy quickly.

People within the office can participate in normal phone calls and answer the office number even though they work remotely from home. Zoom facilitates that quite well. They can run it directly on their phone; they don't need the handset at the desk connected to the back end.

Overall, I rate the solution a seven and a half out of ten.

I use the paid version of the solution in my company to attend meetings. In my company, we have joint meetings in different offices, so we join combinedly through Zoom. My organization has multiple hospitals where managers work, and if we need some information or guidelines, we give them the link to the meeting, and they join it. The meetings on Zoom can go on for more than an hour without any breaks in the video. There is a time frame for the unpaid version. For the paid version, there is no time frame attached to the meetings, making it easy to use.

Everything related to the product is perfect, in my opinion. The video quality and sound quality offered by the product are directly attached to the internet connection that a user has at their place. If you have a good internet connection, the video and sound quality offered by Zoom are great.

Considering the main function of Zoom, it should make the video functioning part a little bit more friendly.

I have been using Zoom for four to five years.

Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine to ten out of ten.

More than 80 people in my company use the product.

The product is not regularly used for meetings, but it is useful to hold multiple meetings. The product offers an option to schedule a meeting. My company schedules meetings with the help of the product, and if anybody has to attend a meeting that has been scheduled, that person will be notified.

I have used Google Meet, but its video and sound quality were very different from what Zoom offers.

The product's initial setup phase was easy.

During the product's deployment phase, I just download and install it, after which I follow the process to login and use it.

The solution is deployed on an on-premises model.

The solution can be deployed in a couple of minutes. You just have to download and install it.

I can take care of the product's deployment myself.

The value from the use of the product reflects areas like webinars, reviews, meetings, discussions and joint meetings.

The tool's paid version is not that expensive. You need to pay 150 USD per year.

The licensing part of the product is not expensive. I rate the product price as nine out of ten. There is no need to pay any additional costs apart from the normal charges attached to the product.

The product's screen-sharing capabilities are perfect.

I feel like the product is quite user-friendly and offers multiple versions, and I feel the paid version is perfect. The multiple features in the product are very helpful for businesses.

The product's security features are good.

I rate the tool an eight out of ten.

I've been using the solution for different vendor meetings and training.

The most valuable features of Zoom are quick connectivity, screen sharing, and quick response. The solution provides good video and sound quality. The solution's screen-sharing and presentation capabilities are really good. Normally, I use the solution for remote meetings.

The solution’s stability could be improved.

I have been using Zoom for four to five years.

I rate the solution a nine out of ten for stability.

Over 100 users are using the solution in our organization.

I rate the solution’s scalability a nine out of ten.

I have previously used Microsoft Teams and Skype for Business.

The solution’s initial setup is straightforward.

We implemented the solution through an in-house team in two minutes. When you click on the Zoom meeting link, you are redirected to the site, where you can automatically download it. We're using Zoom as a third-party tool, and it's not our main communication tool.

Zoom is easy to use, easy to deploy, and easy to organize meetings and webinars.

I am not paying any licensing costs for the solution.

The solution's security features are effective in protecting our meetings. I would recommend the solution to other users because it is stable, reliable, and easy to use. The solution's user interface is user-friendly and intuitive.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Zoom has better connectivity and the failure ratio is less compared to Webex and GoToWebinar. The base infrastructure is robust. The latency is very good. That is why the tool is pricey. The vendor provides hosting and poll features. Zoom is a complete product. It has a good security layer. Every platform has its own security layer to ensure that the data and broadcast are restricted and relayed to only the registered participants. Anyone can easily handle the solution. It is easy to learn.

The solution is pricier than its competitors.

We have been using Zoom for internal and client calls.

Since we work with clients, we have around 100 to 200 users.

We contacted the support team for some activation with Brevo. We wanted to integrate the Brevo platform with events or webinars. The support structure is good. The team replies within a short duration and tries to answer our queries.

We extensively depend on GoToWebinar and Webex. Zoom is a little costlier than GoToWebinar and Webex. Zoom and Webex have very good security layers. RingCentral has a very good suite including in-house messaging and IP phone call features that enable users to get a private number for their organization.

It would be better if people started with Webex. If we need to do more than 10 to 15 webinars a month, we can choose Zoom. If we have fewer events and one or two webinars in a month, we can choose GoToWebinar or other tools like RingCentral. Zoom is better for the internal purposes of a company. Webex or other platforms are better suited for external clients. Overall, I rate the product a nine out of ten.

There is a large energy company that only uses Zoom. When I have meetings with them, they are always called via Zoom. I wouldn't initiate it; I need to have a Zoom account. I don't use many features besides setting up a meeting.

When I had meetings, I used to take notes or record them, but then someone still had to transcribe everything. Now, I'm fascinated by OtterPilot. It automatically transcribes meetings, summarizes them, and identifies action items. I've been recommending it to everyone I know. It is a tool that you can use during Zoom or Teams calls. It takes real-time notes and then sends a summary and action items to everyone via email. It's been really helpful for about three or four years now.

The most valuable feature for me is the integration with platforms. They're all moving towards providing transcripts, but I want a summary of the key points discussed and the action items, so everyone can quickly understand and follow up on them.

The tool integrates with Microsoft Outlook, but the integration with Teams is better than with Zoom. It's functional but could be tighter.

While Zoom calls are great for talking and chatting, they often lack follow-up on action items and collaboration. Most of the time, it's just talking and listening without much progress. There's a missing piece in these tools. About 90 percent of those calls could be replaced by other tools that focus more on the deliverables that make a real impact rather than just being another wasted meeting. It doesn't improve collaboration.

Screen sharing and chat functionality are helpful for productivity, but they could be improved. Finding the screen-sharing button can be tricky, and the process isn't always easy.

I have been using the product for five years.

I am not impressed with the tool's support. It was a bit chaotic how things were organized. It felt like there was a lack of coordination, even regarding my account or tasks. Eventually, things got done, but it took a while. The organization seemed disjointed, with people unsure of their roles and relying on others to solve problems.

Teams is great because it works well with Microsoft. Webex feels old and outdated compared to newer tools like Slack. It's like it's stuck in the past and doesn't have much of a future. Teams is robust and rock solid because of Microsoft. It's extremely well integrated with everything, and you feel secure using it.

Webex's user interface is not up to par, and it lacks the modern features you find in tools like Slack. While they may add a few functions here and there, Webex doesn't seem to have much of a future compared to Teams or other more advanced tools.

If I were to rank them, Webex would be at the bottom. I'm not impressed with Google Meet either. Then it's Zoom, followed by Huddle and Teams. Teams is at the top because it's robust and integrates well with many things. Huddle is catching up fast and is close behind Teams, in my opinion.

I rate the overall product a six out of ten.