PagerDuty Operations Cloud
PagerDutyExternal reviews
935 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Excellent and simple to deploy
What do you like best about the product?
The simplicity to schedule new workflow and the variety of plugins.
WE use it for ansible, Backup process and retention and to manage all the other operations before managed with crontabs
WE use it for ansible, Backup process and retention and to manage all the other operations before managed with crontabs
What do you dislike about the product?
The bad history manage options, you can't set the maximum age of jobs you want to keep. By this way, you 'll use a lot of stoarge on the DB's server and the Rundeck's server becuse of the logs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The scheduling of backup jobs, crontabs without control or error notification.
By this way we have semplified the control and updates of every job and process.
By this way we have semplified the control and updates of every job and process.
Very good managing system
What do you like best about the product?
The best is that you can run I command on multiple servers as different users and different sudo passwords. Amazing!
What do you dislike about the product?
Not too secure. Passwords stored in files, not database
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Much quicker to fix one issue on multiple server.
Swiss knife for sys admins
What do you like best about the product?
With Rundeck is very easy to automate and monitor repetitive task
What do you dislike about the product?
There are some settings that aren't available via web interface
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automate task and manage them easily via web interface
Ease of use for jr admins
What do you like best about the product?
Open Source and highly configurable. We can make scripts for whatever we need.
What do you dislike about the product?
Interface could be better. As you see in my screen shot it is currently broken on chrome in macOS
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
User creation in our environment
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Organize your scripts and make one script for every action so it is portable.
Rundeck has saved us a lot of time.
What do you like best about the product?
The self service part, it helps users automate tasks without coding knowledge.
What do you dislike about the product?
The UI can be a bit dated.It could use a refresh.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Some times the nodes would lose connection
Great solution for on call
What do you like best about the product?
When it's 3:00 AM and you get paged to deal with some crazy issue, you don't want to worry about how to navigate through a clunky UI to access the information you need to remediate the problem. Pager Duty is very intuitive to use and has never gotten in the way of resolving an incident.
I've also had the pleasure of attending some conferences with talks by the Pager Duty team, and I think their own approach and commitment to product availability and resiliency is top notch. The worst thing this type of service could do is fail to page you when an actual incident is occurring; I'm quite confident that they're able to provide service when we need it.
I've also had the pleasure of attending some conferences with talks by the Pager Duty team, and I think their own approach and commitment to product availability and resiliency is top notch. The worst thing this type of service could do is fail to page you when an actual incident is occurring; I'm quite confident that they're able to provide service when we need it.
What do you dislike about the product?
For the nature of my on-call, I often need to take application level remediation rather than just infrastructure remediation. When reading the page of related alerts for a particular incident, I've basically written a few JavaScript scripts that I can run in the browser in order to pull data from the web page into a more structured format. I would love if there were instead an easy way to export structured incident information directly from the UI -- we're sending JSON over to their API, so we ought to be able to get it back out. There are times when it's easier for me to dig through out logs to grab this type of data, but that's even more of a pain. I'd love to be able to get incident and alert info in just one click instead.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use Pager Duty as our on call paging and incident management solution for our SaaS business. It helps us stay organized and recruit the right people to remediate incidents.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Get developers on call with it. My primary role is in application development, but taking ownership for my product and being on call with it has been a fantastic growth experience.
Simple and powerful automation tool!
What do you like best about the product?
Ability to interact with the params via shell as env variables.
What do you dislike about the product?
Plugins are limited to certain endpoints. For example, I cannot use git plugin for our internal git implementation but only for github.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of routine tasks. Runlists automation for repetitive work done by humans. We also use it for reporting on periodic basis.
product, feature release and support
What do you like best about the product?
Strong feature rich product helping automation except rigid and stiff on certain features. Easy installation and maintenance.
What do you dislike about the product?
tiny and least help full documentation specially on product upgrade 3.1.0 to 3.1.2 (my experience). Untested product release of 3.1.2 version. I had to spend almost two weeks to figure out workaround that to reading Rundeck .db files. (WebHook objects creation on MSSQL database had a wrong field type).
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automation of azure resource maintenance, state management.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
NA
Rundeck Review
What do you like best about the product?
Features like running Ad-hoc commands, centralised management for scheduled jobs and logging user activity are making life easy. Integrations with Slack, Jira, Ansible are useful.
What do you dislike about the product?
Scaling is big issue as need to always go for the vertical scaling. No guide to tune it and plan the capacity for job scheduling and debugging/troubleshooting issue is really difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Centralised Scheduling of cron jobs and error handling. Enabling users to execute adhoc commands and compare the output from different instances. Also helps in auditing user activity on multiple stack of servers.
Great product, absolutely terrible pricing changes
What do you like best about the product?
We used this to give certain groups access to do limited work without having to give them the full permissions that would be needed to perform some of these options, the powershell integrations, and especially the SAML authentication were both great for ensuring secure access and execution.
What do you dislike about the product?
When we first bought enterprise, it was reasonably priced with a bulk license per server, we have many individuals that only use this product once a quarter or so, and when they changed the pricing model to per user, per admin, it suddenly because ridiculously expensive in relation to the perceived gain.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helped to realize self service operations for several of our applications, while keeping the technical skill level required low.
showing 421 - 430