Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
A collaboration tool for team development
What do you like best about the product?
The capacity of Progress Chef to enhance team collaboration in application creation and deployment is what I find most remarkable. Team members can easily share resources and information thanks to its collaboration features and unified platform. I also value the tool's support for various computer languages and cloud platforms, which gives development and distribution more freedom and speed.
What do you dislike about the product?
Even though it's a powerful tool, Progress Chef might not be the best choice for smaller teams or businesses due to its intricacy and higher expense. The program requires some technological proficiency and has a steep learning curve. Not to mention, customer support could be more quick and useful, especially to those who are new to the site.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Ineffective processes, human error, and scalability problems are just a few of the problems that Progress Chef addresses for businesses during the creation and implementation of applications. By automating time-consuming chores, its robust automation features and workflow management tools free up workers to concentrate on more crucial aspects of development. Deployment is also more scalable and error-free thanks to its support for numerous settings.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Powerful Open Source Configuration Management on another level!
What do you like best about the product?
In my experience, Progress Chef has several strengths that make it a compelling choice for organizations looking to streamline their infrastructure management.
Firstly, Chef's declarative language makes it easy to define and manage the desired state of infrastructure components. By defining "recipes" and "cookbooks" that describe the desired configuration of each resource, Chef ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments.
Another strength of Chef is its flexibility and extensibility. Chef has a large community of users and contributors who have created a wide range of plugins, integrations, and cookbooks that can be used to automate everyday tasks and integrate with other tools. This makes Progress Chef easy to customize Chef to suit an organisation's specific needs, whether a small startup or a large enterprise.
Firstly, Chef's declarative language makes it easy to define and manage the desired state of infrastructure components. By defining "recipes" and "cookbooks" that describe the desired configuration of each resource, Chef ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments.
Another strength of Chef is its flexibility and extensibility. Chef has a large community of users and contributors who have created a wide range of plugins, integrations, and cookbooks that can be used to automate everyday tasks and integrate with other tools. This makes Progress Chef easy to customize Chef to suit an organisation's specific needs, whether a small startup or a large enterprise.
What do you dislike about the product?
However, like any tool, Progress Chef also has some potential drawbacks. For example, it can have a steep learning curve, especially for those new to infrastructure automation or programming. Additionally, Chef's complexity and flexibility can sometimes make troubleshooting problems or maintaining large codebases difficult.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Progress Chef helps me to solve the following problems in my IT environment:
Ensuring consistency: With Chef, IT professionals can define the desired configuration of each component in their infrastructure as code. This ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments, reducing the risk of human error and simplifying troubleshooting.
Automating tasks: Chef allows IT professionals to automate many of the tasks involved in managing infrastructure, such as provisioning new servers, deploying applications, and configuring network settings. This can save significant time and effort, freeing IT professionals to focus on higher-level tasks.
Scaling infrastructure: Chef makes it easier to scale infrastructure resources up or down in response to changing demand. This can help organizations save costs by only using the resources they need, and it can also improve reliability and performance by allowing resources to be added or removed as needed.
Improving security: Chef can help IT professionals improve the security of their infrastructure by automating the configuration of security settings and policies, such as firewalls and access controls. This can help reduce the risk of security breaches and ensure that the infrastructure remains compliant with relevant regulations and standards.
Ensuring consistency: With Chef, IT professionals can define the desired configuration of each component in their infrastructure as code. This ensures that the infrastructure remains consistent and predictable across environments, reducing the risk of human error and simplifying troubleshooting.
Automating tasks: Chef allows IT professionals to automate many of the tasks involved in managing infrastructure, such as provisioning new servers, deploying applications, and configuring network settings. This can save significant time and effort, freeing IT professionals to focus on higher-level tasks.
Scaling infrastructure: Chef makes it easier to scale infrastructure resources up or down in response to changing demand. This can help organizations save costs by only using the resources they need, and it can also improve reliability and performance by allowing resources to be added or removed as needed.
Improving security: Chef can help IT professionals improve the security of their infrastructure by automating the configuration of security settings and policies, such as firewalls and access controls. This can help reduce the risk of security breaches and ensure that the infrastructure remains compliant with relevant regulations and standards.
Does it worth in 2023?
What do you like best about the product?
1:Progress Chef is known for its easy-to-use interface, making it easy for users to navigate and find what they need.
2:Chef has a large and active community of users, providing resources and support for those who need it.
3:Chef is designed to scale with an organisation's needs, making it an excellent choice for large enterprises or fast-growing companies.
2:Chef has a large and active community of users, providing resources and support for those who need it.
3:Chef is designed to scale with an organisation's needs, making it an excellent choice for large enterprises or fast-growing companies.
What do you dislike about the product?
1:Chef is a complex tool which is difficult for specific tasks, especially for those unfamiliar with its architecture and capabilities.
2: To deploy and maintain effectively, Chef requires significant resources, including hardware and staff.
3:Chef has a large community of users and many resources available, but documentation for the tool can sometimes be challenging for new users.
2: To deploy and maintain effectively, Chef requires significant resources, including hardware and staff.
3:Chef has a large community of users and many resources available, but documentation for the tool can sometimes be challenging for new users.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As a cloud Engineer, I need to work on Infrastructure provisioning, and each project requirement is different as per their choice. To handle all these requirements, the chef has helped me manage infrastructure deployment and provisioning. Chef is designed to scale with an organisation's needs, making it an excellent choice for large enterprises or fast-growing companies. It helped me a lot as it can handle large and complex requirements.
Gets the job done in a nice and easy way
What do you like best about the product?
Automation has never been so easy to do, whether it is a server or other software-related workload; the progressive chef is handy has always been a forte. My team started using progressive chef before puppet or even ansible, and it's still everyone's favorite
What do you dislike about the product?
Not everyone had it easy with how to use it from the start, but after a while, everyone was alright. Create more developer advocates and communities around the product.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Devops tooling for the automation of our software systems. We used chef to automate our Quality Assurance environment before deploying it into production. We have been able to reduce technical debt and go faster then if we were not using it
Chef Review
What do you like best about the product?
It is very user friendly and helps in staying organized and ensures good quality in mass.
What do you dislike about the product?
Documentation of new features is sometimes not very clear.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helps in staying compliant which is something that is always a work in progress
devops engineer
What do you like best about the product?
large community of users, lots of resources on the web.
What do you dislike about the product?
nothing so far, not sure why i cant submit this
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
automation, configuration as code for linux and windows systems
Chef has always been innovative and continues to be now that they are in the Progress family..
What do you like best about the product?
The Progress Chef team is responsive and reachable. They react to concerns and are always ready to help. The tools are best-of-breed and are constantly being improved.
What do you dislike about the product?
Documentation of new features can often be a bit sparse, and discovering said new changes can be a bit difficult. Documentation also varies in detail level and scope.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
First and foremost, compliance. InSpec is completely a game changer in that regard. Ensuring consistency across the enterprise is another huge benefit. I would recommend InSpex (and have) to anyone facing technical compliance issues.
Chef Review - Continuous Configuration & Compliance
What do you like best about the product?
With Chef, we are able to manage nodes in a new way. Our clients get insight into the health, configuration, and compliance of their system in a single platform. Also, since everything is in code, the ways to customize cookbooks, inspec profiles, and tailor policy for each node are limitless.
What do you dislike about the product?
When trying to implement STIGs, a lot of manual work needs to be done out of the box, and not all platforms and versions are supported. As a partner, compliance is a huge selling point, and I have to be up front about the amount of effort it will take to get Chef working for their compliance needs.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Continued enforcement. Knowing that my nodes are checking in regularly so that I can pin point when something unexpected occurs is huge. The automate dashboard gives me visibility at a glance to track down anomolies.
Progress Chef - My Experience
What do you like best about the product?
Centralizing our configuration management for all of our managed nodes through cookbooks for all of our environments. Visibility into the cached cookbooks and ability to test locally.
What do you dislike about the product?
Repeatability is tricky with Chef's two-pass model. Troubleshooting is challenging once the Chef codebase grows significantly. The attributes precedence evaluation is funky.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Chef is solving the automation of our configuration management for all existing and new deployments. We use it a a source of truth for our configuration, ensuring that config is repeatable.
Amazing tool to maintain large IT infrastructure
What do you like best about the product?
The biggest upside is the ability to maintain IT infrastructure config as code. This allows for easy scaling and management of resources. It also ensures no unplanned configuration drift.
What do you dislike about the product?
The minor inconvenience with using chef is handling the installation of the chef client on the remote hosts.
I think it would be better if chef provides an easier tooling to manage the initial setup/installation of the chef-client on the hosts.
I think it would be better if chef provides an easier tooling to manage the initial setup/installation of the chef-client on the hosts.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The biggest advantage of using chef is the ability to manage configuration as code, that is the biggest advantage for us.
showing 1 - 10