ACCELQ
ACCELQReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
105 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Testing with Codeless Automation
What do you like best about the product?
I like ACCELQ's codeless automation approach and user-friendly interface, which makes test creation quick and simple for everyone. It helps both technical and non-technical team members to create and manage tests without needing programming skills. This allows us to build test cases faster, reduce dependency on developers, and quickly update tests whenever requirements change. The integrations with tools like Jenkins, Jira, and Git streamline our workflow. Connecting with Jenkins allows us to automatically trigger test executions as part of our CI/CD pipeline, which saves time and ensures continuous testing with every build or deployment. Integration with Jira helps us easily track defects and link test cases. Since ACCELQ is a cloud-based and codeless platform, there was no need for complex installations or heavy technical configuration, which saved us a lot of time. We were able to onboard the team quickly, connect our applications, and start creating test cases almost immediately. I rated ACCELQ a 10 out of 10 for recommendation because it has made our testing process faster, easier, and more efficient.
What do you dislike about the product?
I think there could be more advanced customization options and deeper reporting or analytics features. It would be helpful to have more flexibility in configuring workflows, reusable components, and test logic to better match our specific project requirements. Options like custom templates, advanced parameterization, and more control over execution settings would allow us to design tests that fit complex scenarios more easily. For reporting, I would like more detailed dashboards that show pass/fail rates over time, flaky test detection, execution history, and defect trends to help us quickly identify problem areas and improve stability.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use ACCELQ for testing processes like web, API, and regression. It reduces manual effort, speeds up test creation, and minimizes script maintenance with its codeless platform, allowing all team members to easily manage tests and quickly update as requirements change.
Improving Test Efficiency and Release Confidence with ACCELQ
What do you like best about the product?
What stands out most about ACCELQ is its model-based, codeless automation approach, which significantly reduces test maintenance compared to traditional script-heavy tools. Once the application behavior is defined, tests become easier to reuse and adapt as the application evolves. The platform also supports web and API testing in a unified way, which helps us manage end-to-end test scenarios more effectively.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is a learning curve at the beginning, especially for teams transitioning from script-based automation. Some advanced scenarios require deeper familiarity with the platform’s structure, and reporting, while useful, could benefit from more customization options for different stakeholders.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
ACCELQ helps us address the challenge of automation maintenance in a fast-changing agile environment. By reducing the effort required to update tests after application changes, our regression cycles are faster and more stable. This has improved release confidence, reduced last-minute testing bottlenecks, and allowed the team to focus more on quality improvements rather than fixing broken tests.
ACCELQ’s Codeless Automation Cuts Maintenance and Boosts Team Collaboration
What do you like best about the product?
ACCELQ’s codeless, model-based automation significantly reduces test maintenance effort and allows both technical and non-technical team members to collaborate effectively while maintaining good test coverage across applications.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is an initial learning curve for teams transitioning from traditional script-based tools, and some advanced testing scenarios require time to fully understand the platform’s approach.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use ACCELQ as our primary quality management and test automation platform for web and API applications, along with manual test case management. It is integrated into our CI/CD pipelines and supports both functional and regression testing across multiple teams.
Effortless API Testing and Integration, Less Manual Work
What do you like best about the product?
API and integration test is made easier and also there are advantages to reduction of manual effort
What do you dislike about the product?
May be problems with scalability for larger enterprises and some performance considerations in complex environments
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Useful for automation of regression testing in multi platform environments
ACCELQ: Powerful No-Code Automation with Some Limitations and Costs
What do you like best about the product?
ACCELQ stands out for its no-code automation, self-healing tests, and end-to-end (UI, API, mobile) coverage — all in one platform. It’s easy to use, integrates well with CI/CD, and greatly reduces test maintenance.
What do you dislike about the product?
ACCELQ can be costly and has a learning curve for full mastery. It sometimes struggles with complex or custom UI scenarios, offers limited customization in reports and workflows, and may show performance issues with large test suites. Desktop automation support is also relatively weak compared to its web and API coverage.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
ACCELQ solves key business problems like high testing costs, slow release cycles, and poor collaboration between QA and development teams. By automating tests without coding and enabling self-healing capabilities, it helps businesses release products faster, improve software quality, and reduce operational costs tied to manual testing and maintenance.
Easy setup, catching the bugs early and both frontend and backend tests run locally without hassle
What do you like best about the product?
We needed both frontend and backend testing, and all the scheduled tests needed to run locally on our own servers, due to safety concerns for customer data, and AccelQ could give us that.
Been easy to learn, and little technical insight is needed to also cover more detailed and backend testing on my own with predefined commands. Whenever I've run into problems or needed assistance on how to solve a task, I've always gotten quick help from support to find a solution. Scheduled tests are predictable, and we are catching more bugs than before at an earlier stage, with an average of 1-3 per week.
Been easy to learn, and little technical insight is needed to also cover more detailed and backend testing on my own with predefined commands. Whenever I've run into problems or needed assistance on how to solve a task, I've always gotten quick help from support to find a solution. Scheduled tests are predictable, and we are catching more bugs than before at an earlier stage, with an average of 1-3 per week.
What do you dislike about the product?
I'm missing more flexibility in views to work with and compare more in parallel to work faster. Also missing more focus on time management of the tests, but have hopes that the new dashboard with it's flexibility in setup also will cover this over time. Used to miss a recording option, but that is also now covered, and I like the easy switch between recording and not recording to be able to better change where in the test I need to continue working.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
In testing our software, having tests covering both frontend and backend in the same flow has helped us to also catch the bugs that initially were not visible if only tested on frontend or backend separately.
Scaling effortless cloud testing for app development teams using AI .
What do you like best about the product?
The Natural Language feature for writing application tests is super easy for any app developer or tester to pick up.
Easy to track application test coverage over several test cases and scenarios.
Easy to track application test coverage over several test cases and scenarios.
What do you dislike about the product?
Would recommend putting less visuals on the test reporting dashboard. The dashboard can become too congested when number of test cases and scenarios increase to over a 100 .
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Test Governance : I am able to track the most tested and least tested parts of my application. This enables me to plan future tests to cover more vulnerable areas.
ACCELQ is a great app which enables us to test our healthcare apps with so much ease.
What do you like best about the product?
I personally love how it handles patient flow automation and data validation smoothly. Plus, the no-code testing feature is a game-changer for non-technical team members like ours. They can jump in and test without any hassle.
What do you dislike about the product?
Mhhhhh Nothing major, just a bit of a learning curve with setting up the environment the first time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We were stuck doing manual testing for our healthcare workflows and data checks, which was slow and risky for some of our critical processes.
Unified platform for Enterprise Apps- ACCELQ
What do you like best about the product?
Its a great intergation tool, no code experience is too good.
What do you dislike about the product?
As of now can't find any challenges. experience is great.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Automate validations to speed up CI/CD pipelines, ensuring comprehensive API chain testing for full coverage. Empower teams with actionable insights for data-driven decisions, while reducing maintenance and operational costs for greater efficiency.
ACCELQ - A Modern AI Powered Tool in Test Automation Space!
What do you like best about the product?
Locator-Free Identification: Simplifies automation by eliminating the dependency on element locators.
Effortless Test Script Creation: User-friendly interface and codeless automation reduce the learning curve and accelerate script creation.
Low Maintenance: Automated tests require minimal effort to maintain, even as applications evolve.
Self-Healing Mechanism: Automatically adapts to application changes, reducing manual intervention and maintenance efforts.
Fast Execution: Ensures smooth and quick execution of test cases.
Performance and Accessibility Insights: Provides valuable metrics on performance and accessibility issues.
Easier Integration with 3rd Party Tools: Seamlessly integrates with popular tools and platforms, enhancing flexibility and compatibility with existing workflows.
Effortless Test Script Creation: User-friendly interface and codeless automation reduce the learning curve and accelerate script creation.
Low Maintenance: Automated tests require minimal effort to maintain, even as applications evolve.
Self-Healing Mechanism: Automatically adapts to application changes, reducing manual intervention and maintenance efforts.
Fast Execution: Ensures smooth and quick execution of test cases.
Performance and Accessibility Insights: Provides valuable metrics on performance and accessibility issues.
Easier Integration with 3rd Party Tools: Seamlessly integrates with popular tools and platforms, enhancing flexibility and compatibility with existing workflows.
What do you dislike about the product?
Context-Driven Approach: While ACCELQ’s context-driven approach to test automation is powerful, it requires careful planning. Without a well-structured approach, the element repository can become messy, leading to confusion and inefficiencies in managing test assets.
This is not the drawback of the tool however a mandatory process for better management.
This is not the drawback of the tool however a mandatory process for better management.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I worked on a Proof of Concept (POC) for use cases specific to the Salesforce platform. ACCELQ proved to have great potential in automating test cases for a dynamic platform like Salesforce. To my surprise, I was able to automate the test cases faster than expected.
When the test scripts were revisited, they were found to be stable, requiring only minimal maintenance, which was effortless to handle. I efficiently utilized ACCELQ's locator-free identification feature, which added to the ease of automation.
Another standout feature was the tool’s intuitive nature—there was no significant learning curve. As I started using the tool, its user-friendly design made it easy to get familiar with its features.
For execution, I used a local agent. The execution process was not only fast but also unattended, requiring no separate effort or enablement. This made the automation experience seamless and efficient.
When the test scripts were revisited, they were found to be stable, requiring only minimal maintenance, which was effortless to handle. I efficiently utilized ACCELQ's locator-free identification feature, which added to the ease of automation.
Another standout feature was the tool’s intuitive nature—there was no significant learning curve. As I started using the tool, its user-friendly design made it easy to get familiar with its features.
For execution, I used a local agent. The execution process was not only fast but also unattended, requiring no separate effort or enablement. This made the automation experience seamless and efficient.
showing 11 - 20