We primarily use the solution as an antivirus and also as a network control with built-in policies regarding device control.

The product is a lighter client. Our previous solution ran heavy on the workstations and caused performance issues. This is lightweight and doesn't take up system resources.

You can use the solution right out of the box. It's ready to go with baseline policies and is good to use without any changes. It's only gotten better since we've added custom rules.

It's simple to use and intuitive. It gives you good visibility and shows what is going on.

The product works well with other SentinelOne solutions and third-party tools. It's pretty seamless. They make it pretty easy to integrate with other products and you can pull data pretty easily from the other solutions.

The solution's ability to ingest and correlate across our security solutions is excellent. It has allowed us to blend data from another product we own.

It's helped us consolidate our other security solutions.

The product provides network and asset visibility. The Ranger piece is probably one of the best items. We have other solutions for asset management, yet none is never 100%. With Ranger, we really get that visibility we need. Having Ranger built into one client and being easy to use has been perfect. It helps us prevent vulnerable devices from being compromised. We've discovered a few assets within our organization we were not managing fully and Ranger has helped us secure our environment just that little bit more.

There are fewer complaints from users when scans are running. The previous solution just used up so many resources. This product runs seamlessly in the background and we know it's running since we get triggers on alerts that are legitimate catches. SentinelOne does a good job at detecting. It's reduced our alerts by 25%.

The product has helped to free up our staff for other projects and tasks. It's freed around 50% of their time.

It's reduced our company's mean time to detect by 40% or more. It's also drastically improved the mean time to respond. We don't have to worry about false positives. We know when we get an alert that it's legitimate, and we need to act on it. That's improved by about 40% to 50%

The biggest thing for me in terms of improvements is the online console. There are frequent updates, and sometimes we'll get a little agitated getting signed in. However, on the product itself, I would not recommend any changes.

I've used the solution for a little over a year.

The solution is very stable. Our old solution required babysitting to make sure everything was running correctly.

Pretty much everybody in the company uses the solution. We have 1,300 deployed agents and ten administrators.

The solution is absolutely scalable.

I have not had to use technical support.

We previously used Sophos. The biggest reason for the switch to SentinelOne was the system resources that were used. Whenever it would kick in, I would get tickets related to machine performance.

The console is on the cloud, however, the devices are on-premises. The initial setup was very straightforward. Overall, it was fairly quick. We had more trouble getting the older product uninstalled than SentinelOne installed. We did the implementation slowly based on the business requirements. We deployed it over the course of a month.

The company does a good job with training and keeping its documentation up to date.

It does not require much maintenance. Every now and then we might have one or two false positives.

We've seen a great ROI on the product. Obviously, we're still within our contract. That said, we've definitely seen a ROI. We've had a couple of incidents where something wouldn't have been detected previously.

The solution is fairly priced for what you get.

We're a customer and end-user.

They do an excellent job at remaining innovative - including with their detection engines and everything involved in their product. They are doing an excellent job compared to everyone else.

SentinelOne has not been around for many years - yet the product is ahead of its time.

With any solution, I'd advise doing a proof of concept first. After that, I would not shy away from fully deploying this solution.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten. The only thing that would improve the product is reducing the online console updates.

We need to provide a form of antivirus for our cybersecurity insurance. The new term now is EDR or endpoint detection response. I tested out several vendors including CrowdStrike, SentinelOne, and Cisco. SentinelOne definitely stood out. My use case is pretty for much protecting all of my end-user devices and all of my servers on-premise and in our virtual environment.

We were trying to solve for visibility and license management. We used to use other products, and licensing became an issue. We would have issues where clients would not really be connected all the time. They would just randomly lose connection. And that was with McAfee.

ESET was another one that we used in the past, and we just kept running the issues with the physical server. So having a cloud-managed EDR solution, the agent-based, cloud-managed solution, has worked very well for a few years now at multiple companies. It's the first thing I bought when I came to my new company.

I really like Ranger. I like the deep dive of Ranger in an incident section. Diving into each incident and being able to see complete visibility of when the action was taken against something that it deemed a threat is valuable. Using those incidents in Ranger is definitely up there on my list of favorite features. I have multiple locations all across the globe. Being able to separate my devices, per location, is super helpful.

It's good at ingesting data and correlating. It has zero issues with ingesting data with the agents installed. I've had no issues with that. Being able to go through and create exclusions for specific types of data, like SQL has been really tough in our environment. Being able to just go through and customize those exclusions and working with the support team is great. We also have Vigilance, which is another SOC that they offer. That's a fantastic service.

Everywhere I have an agent, it sees everything, and it does so when I deep dive into a threat or a proposed threat. It does pick out host names, and IP addresses, and it just gives you a really clear picture where you can read it.

I like that Ranger requires no new agents or hardware. Anytime you can keep it lightweight enough. If you add a function and you only pay for your yearly fee for an extra function without making changes in your environment, that's huge.

I love the reporting. The reporting definitely helps me see the entire network and find what open ports are out there. I can work with my network team to get those things closed, which is fantastic. I like the ease of looking at the graphs and the reports.

The solution has helped reduce our alerts. Instead of waiting on a monthly basis and then executing a plan, I'm able to keep up with it all throughout and day to day. That granular control has left me very impressed.

It gives me peace of mind. My staff isn't really using it. I know I have 24/7 eyes on it.

It has helped me reduce my mean time to detect. I would be lost without the tool. It definitely helps me figure things out really quickly. I can figure out the whole story very quickly.

It helps with my mean time to respond. It definitely helps with that. I get an alert in my email immediately, which lets me just know that something happened to my environment. That's something that I previously did not have in my old tool set.

I do want to see Vigilance reach out with that Identity. I don't have Identity, however, it's a very good tool. There is another tool that I use called Purple Knight that does very similar things. I'd like to see adding Vigilance to the visibility of Identity.

One thing I don't like is the exportable report. They're not as useful as I'd hoped they would be. I always feel like I have to finagle them a little bit before I can present them to the executive board. The reporting needs to be beefed up a bit more. Everything feels a little lacking. They're trying to keep it simple, yet it is a little oversimplified.

I really wish it could be an app on my phone. If I could open up an app on my phone and get all the alerts or look at my environment and see the health real quick, that would be ideal. It doesn't have to be a full feature.

I'd like the ability to have text alerts, for example, if something gets quarantined.

The website, if you are trying to figure out what all the products are, it's kind of busy. I don't know what all the products are. The marketing is a little tough to follow.

I've been using the solution for three years.

I haven't experienced any stability issues.

The solution is extremely scalable. It's super easy to push out to thousands of clients if you really need to. I haven't had any issues. It scales very well.

Usually, technical support is very good. They are very knowledgeable. It's usually 24 hours for a response. I've had a couple of phone conversations with them. Right now, we're going basically through email. They give me a ton of information. They're open to working with my third-party MSP. Right now, the MSP brought up a concern about a very specific function that needs a little bit more tending to in the exclusion arena.

We had Defender at this company before.

I was involved in the initial setup.

The deployment is very straightforward. It's super easy to just download your agent, and you get your site token, you install, and you push it out. We use the PDQ at my last company. Here, we use SCCM. We push it out with the MSI, with the site token pre-installed. I see it on my dashboard. It's easy.

My last deployment was handled by myself.

The solution does not require any maintenance anymore. It used to be kind of a headache to go through and have to update the agent. And just to remember to do it. Now I get the email. It tells me there's a new agent out there. I go read up on what the changes are, which is great. Then I go in there and set up the auto-install on the agents, and it just hits them on the schedule. You only have to really pay attention to it once in a blue moon when a new agent is installed or there's a general release.

I installed the solution myself.

I can pay, for my environment, between $30,000 and $40,000 a year, and that's a pretty good deal.

I'm a customer and end-user.

I haven't really done any third-party tools. I've looked into their Identity tool which is one of the newer offerings that they have. It's a very nice offering. It is rather expensive. That said, it is very nice to be able to see Active Directory all in one pane of glass. Honestly, the hardest thing about my job as a security professional is having all these different tools so the more I can see everything in one area, the better it is.

The quality and maturity are important. The company is relatively new in the space, however, they are pretty mature in the market and pretty well-respected.

SentinelOne is a great strategic partner. I can't see myself doing security without them at this point. They are one of the backbones of my security platform. They were the first pieces even before I bought Cisco Duo or Meraki.

I'm excited to see where this will be in the next ten years. I can just see this platform just going crazy. I would love to see maybe a little bit more focus. We have to deal with a lot of sensitive equipment that run specific jobs and I love how SentinelOne, and specifically Ranger, is very passive in its ability. It complements our OT. I would love to see some way of getting away from the super expensive platforms of Tenable and bringing in some of these functions that Tenable offers from a scanning platform fully into SentinelOne in the future.

I'd rate the solution nine out of ten.

This is a best-in-breed solution. If you're looking at anything in comparison, do your due diligence, do proof of concept between whatever companies you're looking into. However, SentinelOne is the best-in-breed.

We utilize SentinelOne Singularity for endpoint malware protection and to gain visibility into threats across the network.

SentinelOne Singularity has the potential to ingest and correlate data across our security solutions.

Ranger provides network and asset visibility.

Ranger saves us time by not having to make changes to our hardware and systems.

Ranger helps prevent vulnerable devices from being compromised.

SentinelOne Singularity assisted our organization by saving deployment time and decreasing the volume of support calls.

Singularity helps reduce the number of alerts.

Singularity has helped our staff free up around 15 minutes of their time to focus on other projects.

It has reduced our MTTD.

It has helped our organization save costs through time savings.

The most valuable features include the agent installation and update processes.

The UI appears to be flat, and I wish to have the ability to customize it with features and buttons that are tailored to our needs.

I have been using SentinelOne Singularity Complete for seven months.

SentinelOne Singularity is stable. We have not experienced any crashes or downtime.

SentinelOne Singularity scaled easily in terms of deployment. We haven't experienced any performance issues, whether it's installed on a higher-end machine or a low-end machine. SentinelOne Singularity has been excellent.

We faced issues with our previous endpoint solution, Panda Adaptive Defense 360. SentinelOne Singularity seemed to be a more reliable and easier-to-manage alternative. Panda Adaptive Defense 360 caused significant downtime during deployments and updates.

The initial setup was straightforward. The deployment required three people.

The implementation was completed in-house.

We assessed McAfee, Trend Micro, and BlackBerry. We opted for SentinelOne Singularity due to its smaller footprint and more efficient software that uses fewer resources.

I rate SentinelOne Singularity a nine out of ten.

SentinelOne Singularity is a mature product.

Maintenance is necessary only when we are periodically carrying out updates.

Having a vendor like SentinelOne is crucial for a solid security strategy, as we aim for a product that seamlessly caters to both the IT department and end users. We intend to avoid exacerbating issues more than resolving them. Therefore, I believe SentinelOne is a suitable solution for us – easy to deploy and maintain on a daily basis.

I suggest trying out SentinelOne Singularity and comparing it to more traditional security vendors. SentinelOne Singularity offers a slightly distinct approach, but it's an effective method.