Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

DataHub

Datahub

Reviews from AWS customer

4 AWS reviews

External reviews

2 reviews
from

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


4-star reviews ( Show all reviews )

    reviewer2834340

Centralized and protected customer data has enabled teams to access trusted metrics independently

  • April 30, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

I use Data Hub for centralizing and protecting data sources for a personal project involving CRMs and user activity for this app, which includes user activity and marketing data. By doing this, each team such as sales and marketing can pull their data according to requirements without intervening in each other's data, and I have set up role-based access so sensitive financial data is protected while each department only sees what they need. My latest task was automating a weekly dashboard so stakeholders can get a snapshot of all the key metrics in one place.

My main use case for Data Hub involves consolidating data from different business units such as marketing, sales, and products. I am using it to centralize all the customer engagement metrics, ensure consistent reporting, and give teams the ability to quickly analyze cross-functional channels performance, all in one place.

What is most valuable?

One of the best features Data Hub offers is role-based access to all data, which stands out to me because not everyone needs all of the data for their specific purposes. For example, if you are in marketing, you would need the data that sales teams analyze, and a CEO would need the data made into a metric to understand it. Role-based access ensures consistency and enforces security rules across the board, and end-to-end lineage allows me to track where each data point comes from, enhancing the ability to scale and add new sources.

End-to-end lineage helps me in my workflow by allowing me to track every data point back to its origin, which is essential for understanding who added the data. Because of the role-based access, discrepancies can be tracked back to their source and resolved easily, saving considerable time instead of going through the entire workflow again.

Data Hub has positively impacted my organization by providing a single source of truth, which means everyone works from the same accurate data set. If the data gets corrupted or another issue arises, it can be fixed easily. Correct data makes decision-making faster and easier, rather than manually reconciling different sources. This has reduced errors in reporting and made us more agile when integrating new data streams, increasing overall efficiency and trust in our data significantly.

What needs improvement?

Data Hub could improve with built-in analytics and custom dashboards so we do not have to rely on external tools, which would also make it easier for teams to get insights right inside Data Hub.

Data Hub has room for added features. For example, it lacks an automatic system for preventing errors from being pushed into data. I chose this rating because I do not believe it has an automatic system to avoid pushing errors, but it is truly good at doing what it does.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Data Hub for a short time, approximately one or two weeks.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Data Hub is stable, and I have not experienced any issues with reliability or downtime.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Data Hub can handle growing data and users easily, which I find effective.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

Before Data Hub, I used to do things manually by creating codes or scripts, and I did not use a different solution.

How was the initial setup?

I can provide insights on the setup, which I find easier, but I am not able to provide information on pricing, cost, or licensing.

What was our ROI?

I see a return on investment because the role-based system reduces the chances of errors and makes them easier to resolve.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options before choosing Data Hub, and there were no other products considered.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to those looking into using Data Hub is that if you are concerned about data integrity and frequent corruptions, this platform can help in evaluating where problems originate and allow for solutions right at the source.

Since starting to use Data Hub, specific outcomes include saved time because we can easily track and fix any problem that arises, which is better than going through all the data at once. There is also a reduction in errors, as we can identify their source and eradicate them right away. I rate Data Hub an eight out of ten overall.


    reviewer2784462

Centralized metadata has empowered governed data discovery and clarified ownership for all teams

  • December 27, 2025
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

We adopted Data Hub in the context of a large enterprise customer operating in a regulated industry with a strong focus on data governance, data discoverability, and ownership clarity across multiple cloud-native platforms. The solution was deployed on AWS, and the main business problem was the lack of a centralized, reliable view of data assets, including poor data discoverability, unclear data ownership and stewardship, limited lineage visibility across ingestion and transformation layers, and high dependency on tribal knowledge held by a few individuals. Data Hub was selected as an enterprise data catalog and metadata backbone with the goal of enabling both technical teams and business users to easily understand, trust, and reuse data.

We used Data Hub to create very good data discoverability, assign data ownership and stewardship, improve data quality processes, and establish good data governance for our customer in terms of data catalog, data lineage, and metadata management in general.

What is most valuable?

Our key benefits that we achieved include centralized metadata management across multiple AWS services and data platforms and improved data discoverability, significantly reducing the time required to find relevant data sets. Clear data ownership and stewardship improved accountability and collaboration between teams. End-to-end lineage visibility enabled faster impact analysis and safer changes, and faster onboarding of new data users through self-service access to documentation and metadata. From a governance perspective, Data Hub became a single source of truth for metadata, supporting both compliance requirements that are very important in a data governance environment and day-to-day operational needs.

The main strengths we experienced with Data Hub are a strong metadata model and its extensibility because Data Hub offers a rich and flexible metadata model that adapts well to complex enterprise scenarios. Excellent lineage capabilities are provided because the lineage visualization is clear, actionable, and extremely useful for impact analysis and governance workflow. The open source foundation with enterprise readiness is significant because the open architecture avoids vendor lock-in while still being suitable for production-grade environments.

Data Hub is very effective for us because we build the data lineage from the beginning, from origination to visualization, to the final use of the data. We follow and track a path of the data, which improves analysis and enables us to find where data is used and the impact of deleting data. This is also very important in a regulatory environment.

What needs improvement?

The impact is very positive, and there are many benefits for us using Data Hub because it was easier to make data governance, create centralized metadata management, improve data discoverability, and manage data in general. The areas for improvement, in my opinion, are the initial setup and configuration that can be complex without prior experience, especially in large-scale environments. User experience for non-technical users could be further simplified, particularly around advanced metadata concepts. The out-of-the-box governance workflow, for example, approvals and certification, could be more prescriptive for customers at early maturity stages.

Data Hub can be improved in the initial setup and configuration that is somewhat complex, and also in operational monitoring that could benefit from more native dashboards and alerts. However, these are not blockers, but areas where additional guidance or product enhancement would further accelerate adoption.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Data Hub since 2023.

What other advice do I have?

Based on internal measurement and feedback from the data teams, there are many impacts. Time to locate and understand a data set was reduced by approximately 40-50 percent. Manual documentation effort was reduced by around 40 percent. Dependency on senior data engineers for data explanation dropped significantly. Data onboarding time for new team members decreased from weeks to days.

I would rate this product a 9 out of 10. I chose nine because Data Hub proved to be a robust, scalable, enterprise-ready data catalog that is well-suited for AWS-based architecture and complex organizational environments. It is always possible to improve and useful to maintain space for further optimization.

My advice is to use Data Hub to move from fragmented metadata and manual processes to a modern, governed, and self-service data ecosystem, delivering clear value in terms of efficiency, cost saving, and data trust. We would confidently recommend Data Hub to organizations looking to improve data governance, data discovery, and metadata management on AWS.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    reviewer2784771

Analytics work has become more efficient and now processes large datasets with flexibility

  • December 04, 2025
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for Acryl Data is analytics.

What is most valuable?

Acryl Data helps with processing large amounts of data as it is a very good tool that gives good flexibility to store a huge amount of data and is easier to use. The UI is good.

The best features Acryl Data offers include storage. When I mention storage, I refer to its scalability.

The positive impact of Acryl Data is that it has increased efficiency.

What needs improvement?

I do not have comments on how Acryl Data can be improved.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using Acryl Data for two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

Acryl Data is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

Acryl Data's scalability is good.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support is good.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not previously use a different solution.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with pricing and setup was good.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment as it has saved time.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing Acryl Data, I did not evaluate other options.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using Acryl Data is that they can use it. I gave this product a rating of 9.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


showing 1 - 3