Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Simple for small open source project
What do you like best about the product?
- Easy to set-up with few forms to start
- Wide support of languages
- For enterprises, pricing is abordable even for unlimited projects
- Hooks and deployments processes
- Wide support of languages
- For enterprises, pricing is abordable even for unlimited projects
- Hooks and deployments processes
What do you dislike about the product?
- The lack of features! While using it during one year, the service has not move forward and is still rudimentary
- No separation of git branches
- Settings are too simple, with no way to customize some dependencies versions.
- No separation of git branches
- Settings are too simple, with no way to customize some dependencies versions.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Continuous integration for small projects. It allows you to free time for development and not just checking if your legacy code still work all time: with automatic builds at each commit, your tests ensure you're going to the right direction, without breaking anything.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Try to make a script that can run your build easily: configuration in Drone.io is hard due to the small size of the textarea dedicated to it...
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Drone.io is one of the best hosted and on premise CI
What do you like best about the product?
My favorite of any tool is being Open Source and distributed under a permissive license like Apache License. More specifically, it is easily up and running locally thanks to the use of Docker. Furthermore, thanks to a deep integration of Docker, containers are used to to build code and test it. As well as making the transfer form development phase to staging to production a very simple task for any developer.
A hosted alternative is also provided and it's integrated with many code hosting solutions like Github, Bitbucket.
A hosted alternative is also provided and it's integrated with many code hosting solutions like Github, Bitbucket.
What do you dislike about the product?
Drone has a basic and simple UI compared to other hosted alternatives. The UI tends to make users adapt their CI process to Drone features/limitations. I was also maybe noticing that drone.io isn’t going anywhere these days. It's integration with AWS services (e.g. S3) is not perfect and has a lot of limitations.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use Drone.io (among other hosted solutions) to deploy specific branches of our the codebase of a front-end application to S3 and to automate some NGINX config.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Drone is good CI solution especially if you're looking for an on-premise solution and it's deep integration with Docker make it even better for fast builds. However, some features of Drone seem to be in beta for some time now (like S3). This gives you a strange feeling as Drone not going anywhere while most of hosted services tend to surprise their users with new features/improvement from time to time.
showing 81 - 82