DX Platform
DXReviews from AWS customer
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
305 reviews
from
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Out of the Box Software Development Measurements
What do you like best about the product?
I like how DX provides built-in comparisons, measuring against industry standards or our own past reporting periods. It aggregates data across multiple tools, which means I don't have to implement something in-house to derive insights from disparate systems. DX already shows the core metrics for software development, which are the specific metrics I'm looking for. It also has integrations with our GitHub, JIRA, and more, which is great. Plus, I use it in Slack to send AI-generated summaries on progress from my teams. As an individual user, I found the initial setup to be easy.
What do you dislike about the product?
It's not always intuitive if you want to drill down into a specific report, or be able to compare individual cohorts to each other if those aren't already defined in DX. It's frustrating when I feel too locked into their predefined filters and reports without the flexibility to drill in a different way I want. Sometimes filter facets are only single select when I'd like to select multiple of that same facet type.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use DX to identify improvement areas and track progress in development teams. It aggregates insights from tools like GitHub, Jira, and provides built-in comparisons which prevents the need for in-house solutions.
Invaluable for Team Performance Monitoring
What do you like best about the product?
I find the quarterly snapshots in DX incredibly useful because they expose issues with our process and provide the tools to determine if the changes we make based on those issues are actually making a difference. This feature allows us to break down answers by team, monitor stats like PR Cycle Time and AI usage, and find out what parts of our process are working well.
What do you dislike about the product?
The list of reports can be a little overwhelming, making it hard to know what I should be paying attention to. Also the time in hours can be confusing to know if it's working hours vs clock hours, and how they calculate business hours.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use DX to monitor team performance and track process effectiveness, exposing areas for improvement. It provides insights on PR Cycle Time and AI usage to determine if we're on the right track.
Insightful Tracking and Action Feedback
What do you like best about the product?
I like that DX makes it easy to get insights from team members and track actions for issues with low scores. The tracking mechanism is great because I can easily see whether the actions are having results. Registering an action for a given subject and seeing the improvements in the next measure is particularly helpful. Compared to several types of polls we use, DX stands out with its tracking capabilities.
What do you dislike about the product?
In my company the use of DX is not anonymous, which makes some people insecure about answering it. I'm not sure if this is a choice or a limitation of the platform.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use DX for assessing developer experience. It makes it easy to get insights from the team and track actions on low scores. I like the tracking mechanism; it shows if actions result in improvements.
DX Delivers Clear Org-Wide Visibility with an Easy UI and Fast, Helpful Support
What do you like best about the product?
DX is a great tool to give me high-level visibility across my organization. The UI/UX is easy to use and integrates well with the tools in our organization. The support team is great. Any time I have had an issue, they respond quickly, including bug fixes. It's been great to help us understand performance bottlenecks in our SDLC and AI adoption.
What do you dislike about the product?
There is not much I dislike about DX. I think that it does a great job at engaging the organization through the survey tool, and the team behind it has been receptive to feedback.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Helping to get a holistic view of our engineering teams, and converting that to measurable data across our various systems.
Unique Productivity Insights with a Clean, Intuitive UX
What do you like best about the product?
Provides visibility into engineering productivity that's otherwise hard to measure. The mix of the qualitative and quantative measurement seems unique. It's a clean UX/UI
What do you dislike about the product?
Integration with other tools takes forever. Also the pricing is pretty expensive for where we are in our journey as a company.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
DX is helping us measure developer experience: productivity and job-specific sentiment. The benefit is being able to identify friction points (slow builds, unclear priorities, meeting load) and prioritize investments that actually improve how engineers work
Centralized Collaboration and Clear Visibility for Deployments and Incidents
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about DX is how it centralizes collaboration and operational visibility across teams. At Pliant GmbH, where engineering, product, operations, and compliance work closely together on payment infrastructure and card management features, DX helped reduce the fragmentation that often comes from relying on multiple tools in parallel.
One of the most valuable benefits for me was having a clearer, shared overview of ongoing projects, deployments, and incident handling in a single place. For example, during API rollout phases or payment-processing updates, DX made it much easier to coordinate between developers, product managers, and operations without depending entirely on scattered Slack conversations and Jira tickets.
I also appreciated how DX strengthened our incident-response workflows. When issues were detected through Datadog alerts, teams could coordinate faster, assign ownership more clearly, and track progress in a more structured way. In a fintech environment where response times and operational reliability are critical, that added visibility and coordination made a noticeable difference.
One of the most valuable benefits for me was having a clearer, shared overview of ongoing projects, deployments, and incident handling in a single place. For example, during API rollout phases or payment-processing updates, DX made it much easier to coordinate between developers, product managers, and operations without depending entirely on scattered Slack conversations and Jira tickets.
I also appreciated how DX strengthened our incident-response workflows. When issues were detected through Datadog alerts, teams could coordinate faster, assign ownership more clearly, and track progress in a more structured way. In a fintech environment where response times and operational reliability are critical, that added visibility and coordination made a noticeable difference.
What do you dislike about the product?
One thing I disliked about DX is that some workflows could feel too rigid when handling more complex, cross-functional processes. At Pliant GmbH, teams like engineering, compliance, operations, and product management often work in very different ways, and adapting DX to fit all of those approaches sometimes meant relying on additional manual workarounds.
Another challenge was the depth of reporting and analytics. DX offered solid high-level visibility, but there were cases where teams needed more granular insights. For instance, during larger payment infrastructure rollouts or incident reviews, it would have been helpful to have more advanced dashboards, clearer dependency tracking, and stronger historical analytics without having to rely on external reporting tools.
There were also occasional limitations with integrations. Since we used Jira, Slack, GitHub, Confluence, and Datadog at the same time, keeping workflows fully synchronized sometimes required extra manual coordination. Updates in one system didn’t always show up instantly or clearly across connected workflows, which could lead to duplicate follow-ups or small communication gaps.
Lastly, as workflows scaled across multiple teams and projects, navigation and performance sometimes felt slower than expected, especially when working with larger operational boards or more complex project structures.
Another challenge was the depth of reporting and analytics. DX offered solid high-level visibility, but there were cases where teams needed more granular insights. For instance, during larger payment infrastructure rollouts or incident reviews, it would have been helpful to have more advanced dashboards, clearer dependency tracking, and stronger historical analytics without having to rely on external reporting tools.
There were also occasional limitations with integrations. Since we used Jira, Slack, GitHub, Confluence, and Datadog at the same time, keeping workflows fully synchronized sometimes required extra manual coordination. Updates in one system didn’t always show up instantly or clearly across connected workflows, which could lead to duplicate follow-ups or small communication gaps.
Lastly, as workflows scaled across multiple teams and projects, navigation and performance sometimes felt slower than expected, especially when working with larger operational boards or more complex project structures.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
DX mainly addresses issues caused by fragmented communication, limited workflow visibility, and inefficient coordination across teams. At Pliant GmbH, many teams collaborate closely on payment infrastructure, card operations, API integrations, compliance processes, and customer-facing product features. Before DX, a lot of information was scattered across Slack conversations, Jira tickets, Confluence pages, and monitoring tools, which made it difficult to maintain a clear operational overview.
A major benefit has been stronger cross-functional coordination. For example, during payment-processing updates or new feature rollouts, engineering, product, and operations teams can now track progress, blockers, deployment status, and ownership in a more central place, rather than relying on multiple disconnected systems. This has reduced communication overhead and helped teams move faster with fewer misunderstandings.
DX has also improved incident management workflows. When Datadog alerts indicate service degradation or payment-related issues, teams can coordinate responses more efficiently, assign responsibilities more quickly, and keep better visibility into resolution progress. In a fintech environment where uptime and response speed are critical, this has directly improved operational reliability and reduced delays during incident handling.
Another important benefit is the reduction in manual effort. Teams spend less time switching between tools or chasing updates across different channels, which lets them focus more on delivery, troubleshooting, and product improvements. As the company scaled, this became increasingly valuable, since operational complexity grew significantly across departments.
A major benefit has been stronger cross-functional coordination. For example, during payment-processing updates or new feature rollouts, engineering, product, and operations teams can now track progress, blockers, deployment status, and ownership in a more central place, rather than relying on multiple disconnected systems. This has reduced communication overhead and helped teams move faster with fewer misunderstandings.
DX has also improved incident management workflows. When Datadog alerts indicate service degradation or payment-related issues, teams can coordinate responses more efficiently, assign responsibilities more quickly, and keep better visibility into resolution progress. In a fintech environment where uptime and response speed are critical, this has directly improved operational reliability and reduced delays during incident handling.
Another important benefit is the reduction in manual effort. Teams spend less time switching between tools or chasing updates across different channels, which lets them focus more on delivery, troubleshooting, and product improvements. As the company scaled, this became increasingly valuable, since operational complexity grew significantly across departments.
Effortless Data Sharing with Insightful Analysis
What do you like best about the product?
I like using DX because it's an easy platform for everyone in the company, which makes collecting and sharing survey results straightforward. The ease of use means there's a big percentage of participation, and management can extract insights and action items quickly. The nice reports that DX provides are another positive aspect, making the data useful and presentable. Additionally, the initial setup of DX was easy and nice, which added to the overall positive experience.
What do you dislike about the product?
I'm pretty much happy with it. Maybe more ways to aggregate and compare data. I'd like to be able to pick specific performance views and add them to a comparison view so I can compare different views.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use DX for collecting and sharing survey results. It provides an easy platform for the whole company, generates nice reports, and helps management quickly extract insights and action items.
Insightful AI Monitoring with Extensive Connectivity
What do you like best about the product?
I love the insane number of connectors that DX natively integrates with, like Claude, Codex, Github, and Opsgenie. They connect smoothly and fetch relevant data, giving us insights into our usage. The initial setup was pretty easy and convenient too.
What do you dislike about the product?
The AI lightweight daemon for macOS feels a bit tricky to use, and visual aspects of the dashboards could be improved. Also, during deployment, running 'cat' on deployed machines exposes the API credentials to end users who have root access, which could be a security concern.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
DX lets me monitor AI usage in our organization while providing more visibility on AI spends, and its numerous connectors smoothly integrate tools, fetching data and offering usage insights.
A Simple, Effective Way to Measure Developer Productivity
What do you like best about the product?
It helps measure developer productivity.
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing of note so far to dislike about it DX
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It allows me to identify process bottlenecks and improve our ability to deliver on business goals
Limited Usefulness Due to Incomplete Data
What do you like best about the product?
I like that I get a weekly message on Slack which includes some of the things my team does.
What do you dislike about the product?
DX is not including vital information that would make it actually useful for me. It only looks at PRs, which is not the whole picture. Some of my team members might go an entire week without submitting a PR and then are just omitted from the report completely. That's not useful to me.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I get a weekly Slack message with some team activities, but vital information is missing. DX only looks at PRs, ignoring other aspects of my team's work, which isn't helpful for comprehensive monitoring.
showing 1 - 10