Clear visual cloud visibility for complex environments
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about Hyperglance is that it makes complex cloud environments much easier to understand visually. Instead of relying only on native cloud consoles, spreadsheets, or manual diagrams, Hyperglance can provide a more unified view of cloud resources, relationships, and architecture.
The visual diagrams and inventory views are especially useful because they help teams quickly understand what exists in the environment and how resources are connected. This is valuable for architects, engineers, security teams, and FinOps users who need to make decisions based on the actual state of the cloud.
I also like that Hyperglance combines visibility with practical operational use cases such as cost optimization, security and compliance monitoring, alerts, and automation. That makes it more useful than a static documentation tool because it can help identify risks, waste, and configuration issues in the live cloud environment.
Overall, the best part of Hyperglance is that it turns cloud complexity into something easier to explore, explain, and act on.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I dislike about Hyperglance is that the value depends heavily on how complex and well-organized the cloud environment already is. If the environment has inconsistent tagging, unclear ownership, unused resources, or weak governance, Hyperglance can expose those problems clearly, but it does not automatically solve the underlying process issues.
There can also be a learning curve for teams that are not used to thinking about cloud architecture visually. The diagrams and resource relationships are very useful, but users still need enough cloud knowledge to interpret what they are seeing and decide what action to take.
Another area for improvement is that teams may need time to tune alerts, rules, filters, and views so the platform highlights the most important issues without creating noise. In larger environments, the amount of information can be overwhelming at first, so the initial setup and configuration approach matters a lot.
Overall, I think Hyperglance is powerful, but it works best when the organization already has some cloud governance discipline and clear owners for acting on the insights it provides.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance helps solve the problem of cloud complexity and lack of visibility across cloud environments. In many organizations, cloud resources are spread across multiple accounts, subscriptions, regions, services, and teams, which makes it difficult to understand the full architecture, ownership, security posture, and cost impact from one place.
The main benefit is that Hyperglance gives teams a more visual and centralized way to understand what is running in the cloud and how resources are connected. This makes it easier to identify misconfigurations, unused or underutilized resources, potential security risks, and areas where cloud spend can be optimized.
It also helps reduce the need for manual cloud diagrams and spreadsheets. Instead of relying on documentation that can quickly become outdated, teams can work from a more current view of the environment. That improves communication between architecture, engineering, security, and operations teams.
Overall, Hyperglance benefits us by improving cloud visibility, making architecture easier to explain, supporting better governance, and helping teams act faster on cost, security, and operational issues.
Hyperglance gave us greater control over our cloud infrastructure
What do you like best about the product?
I tried Hyperglance in a work environment where we needed to have greater control over our cloud infrastructure, and the truth is that the experience was quite positive.
What do you dislike about the product?
Regarding the price, it is not a cheap solution, but if you manage a moderately large infrastructure, I think it pays off relatively easily thanks to the optimization it allows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cost control. It helped me identify resources that were oversized or directly unused. It's not that it works magic, but it does give you the necessary information to make smarter decisions and save.
Unified cloud visibility has improved cost control and onboarding but needs simpler interface and pricing
What is our primary use case?
Our main use case for Hyperglance is cloud analysis, which helps us visualize the infrastructure and serves as a cost-effective cloud management system for our organization.
We initially faced an issue with AWS where costs were very high and tracking dependencies was difficult. We switched to Hyperglance to have a single view of the cloud, which addresses costs, architecture, and dependencies together. This allows us to consolidate our cloud infrastructure from AWS and Kubernetes into one unified location.
What is most valuable?
Hyperglance provides visibility that creates a unified view of the entire cloud system, allowing us to debug much faster than we were able to initially. With this visibility, new engineers being onboarded find it easier to understand the infrastructure. Cost optimization is also a significant benefit we gain from Hyperglance, as we are able to see unused resources, which aids in budgeting.
Beyond easier onboarding and faster debugging, Hyperglance automatically identifies idle servers, reducing costs by shutting them down and creating Jira tickets automatically.
The unified view offered by Hyperglance is a huge benefit that we have been able to see. These features stand out for us because it becomes easier to make decisions when all of the information is in a single, simple, unified view. This simplicity makes it easier to debug and for new team members to understand the infrastructure, as they can see budget costs and consider options regarding budgeting, ultimately increasing capacity and speeding up decision-making.
Hyperglance is greatly scalable because, as soon as we scale it to a greater architecture or a larger number of servers, it quickly identifies unused resources, making debugging faster and enhancing budget tracking. We also receive automatic anomaly alerts, so I would say it performs very well in terms of scalability.
What needs improvement?
Hyperglance has a multi-cloud visualization system and automates many things; however, a downside is that the user interface feels somewhat complex when you start. When we first began using Hyperglance, the user interface felt complex initially, but once you become familiar with it, it becomes easier to use. It is powerful, but it is not very easy for a beginner to adapt to.
The user interface of Hyperglance might feel complex in the initial stages, and I would also say that it can be somewhat expensive for small teams or early-stage startups. Hyperglance could be costly for someone with simple infrastructure. Therefore, I think the cost aspect and the user interface could be improved.
Hyperglance is a powerful tool when it comes to cloud operations, functioning as a control system. However, for an early-stage startup that does not have much reliance or is not heavily dependent on cloud operations, it might not be a good option for them. If the cost could be reduced and onboarding made a little easier, early-stage startups would benefit greatly from Hyperglance.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Hyperglance for nine months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Hyperglance is stable in its performance.
How are customer service and support?
I have not faced any issues that required customer support, so I cannot comment on that. However, I think the product is really good, and we have not had many issues that would necessitate support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Initially, we were using AWS before switching to Hyperglance.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment from Hyperglance, as we are now able to identify waste very efficiently. We have achieved approximately twenty percent cost reduction due to the shutdown of idle servers, and we have also seen approximately eight to ten percent improvement in time, providing significant benefits from Hyperglance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost was pretty steep, and we were not initially very certain about taking Hyperglance due to its price. However, it is a very powerful tool, and I have not been the one handling the pricing and licensing aspects.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated other options before choosing Hyperglance, but I cannot elaborate on this as I am not familiar with those specific options.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Hyperglance is to first assess their team's needs. If there is a small team that does not rely heavily on cloud services and does not need multi-cloud complexity, they might be fine without it. However, if they have a heavy reliance on cloud services and need visibility, automated shutdown of idle servers, and budget tracking, I would definitely suggest Hyperglance. Although it might be complex initially, once you become familiar with it, it is an excellent tool.
For Fintech teams or those who rely heavily on cloud services, Hyperglance might be a great tool, even though the user interface might feel complex at first. I would rate this review a seven overall.
Clear Real-Time Cloud Cost Visibility with Actionable Optimizations
What do you like best about the product?
Hyperglance gives clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and resource usage.
It identifies waste and suggests actionable optimizations automatically.
Best suited for multi-cloud or complex environments where cost and security insights need to be unified.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hyperglance can feel like overkill for smaller setups with limited cloud usage. There’s also a bit of a learning curve before you can fully take advantage of all its features. Pricing can be on the higher side as well, especially when compared to native cloud cost tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance provides clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and overall resource usage. It helps pinpoint waste and automatically recommends practical, actionable optimizations. In my experience, it’s best suited for multi-cloud or more complex environments where you want cost and security insights brought together in one unified view.
Interactive Cloud Visualizations and Cost Optimization Insights
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Hyperglance is its visualization of complex cloud architecture through interactive diagrams. It makes our infrastructure much easier to understand. Also, the cost optimization feature is very good—its insights help us identify and terminate unused resources, which helps us save on our cloud costs.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I didn’t like about Hyperglance is that the platform feels complex, and I think there’s a learning curve for new users when they first start using it. Also, the initial setup took some time to get everything configured correctly. On top of that, I think pricing can be a concern for small teams that are just starting out.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem it solves is understanding complex cloud architectures by providing a clear visual view of all resources and their relationships. It also helps with cost management: using Hyperglance, I can identify unused, untagged, and zombie resources that can be terminated, which saves a lot of cost.
Clear Cloud Infrastructure Visuals That Make Issues Easy to Spot
What do you like best about the product?
i like the clear visual representation of the cloud infrastructure that makes it easy to understand complex environments and spot issues fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
the interface is bit complex at first for new users and some advance features take time to fully understand
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of managing complex cloud environments and understanding them. It provides clear visuals for infrastructure, cost, and security, which helps me quickly identify issues, reduce risks, and make better decisions.
Real-time cloud visualization has unified multi-cloud management and has reduced ongoing costs
What is our primary use case?
I use Hyperglance my organization for real-time cloud visualization and managing FinOps applications.
In real-time cloud visualization, we use the interactive diagrams for full infrastructure including managing VMs, network, and all dependencies. It helps us understand which applications or VMs are connected where, and it eliminates the need for manual documentation.
Hyperglance also helps us use custom dashboards and reports as it provides multi-cloud dashboards and billing support for managing different cloud environments in a single place.
What is most valuable?
The best features are real-time cloud visualization, advanced FinOps management, automation, security, and custom dashboards and reports.
For automation, Hyperglance provides a codeless rules engine that can auto-fix issues through info tagging and stopping idle instances. It also integrates with Slack and Jira.
At my organization, Hyperglance has positively impacted us by saving costs as it identified unused resources that we could delete, which saved us money. Better visibility is provided as it offers a single plane for multiple cloud environments and provides real-time dashboards.
It has saved considerable time for managing multiple cloud environments, with cloud costs reduced by 30%.
What needs improvement?
Hyperglance can be improved by providing a less steep learning curve. The UI is powerful, but it is complex for beginners. I faced issues initially, and the initial setup takes time.
The initial setup requires significant time, and you need a basic understanding of Hyperglance from the start.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Hyperglance for the past two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Hyperglance is stable in my experience.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is good as Hyperglance supports multiple cloud accounts, clusters, and subscriptions. Workload can be distributed across the architecture, and it can handle any number of resources at enterprise scale. It can be used by large enterprises and government organizations, as we have multiple clients from the government and enterprise sectors.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is excellent as they are always available to help and provide quality support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Initially, we were using solutions like VMware and others, but we found Hyperglance to be better, with the main purpose being cost savings.
When I joined my organization, Hyperglance was already in use from the start, so I do not have much information about the transition.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup takes considerable time, and you need a basic understanding of Hyperglance from the start.
What was our ROI?
We required fewer employees, and our time was saved as it helps in managing multi-cloud environments. Cloud costs have been reduced by 20 to 25%.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not have information about the licensing, but the setup cost was somewhat less than other comparable tools.
What other advice do I have?
I purchased Hyperglance through the AWS Marketplace.
If others are considering using Hyperglance, they can easily switch as it will reduce their costs and provide cost benefits. They will also gain additional benefits as it will help them manage their multiple resources in a single plane. I rate this product 9 out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Unified multi-cloud view has improved cost control and strengthened self-hosted security
What is our primary use case?
I have been using Hyperglance for the past two to three years. I use Hyperglance primarily for cloud management and FinOps platform management. Additionally, I use it for the unified multi-cloud view where it provides a single plane where I can manage my different types of Kubernetes clusters in a single interface.
What is most valuable?
The best features Hyperglance offers in my experience are real-time 3D visualization, FinOps and cost optimization, no-code automation, and unified cloud view.
I find myself relying on the unified multi-cloud view the most, as it helps us to manage and keep monitoring on our different types of Kubernetes and other clusters at a single platform.
Hyperglance has impacted my organization positively in many ways; we got a single view of our multiple cluster managements, and it also improved our security. It helped us with our self-hosted security as many software-as-a-service tools cannot. Hyperglance provided a self-hosted own cloud where we can manage our self PVC and virtual network, so that our data never leaves our environment.
What needs improvement?
From my perspective, Hyperglance can only improve its UI/UX design.
They can improve their dashboard as well, as their dashboard has a lot of customization limits, so they can improve it.
The reason I did not give it a 10 is that they also need some improvements like resource handling; they can effectively manage environments, and also for licensing purposes.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Hyperglance's scalability is good, but some users report that it has a lag and slow loading time when visualizing a large resource count.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support is very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not evaluate other options before choosing Hyperglance, as we have been using Hyperglance from the start.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Hyperglance, I did not evaluate any other options.
What other advice do I have?
If others are looking into using Hyperglance, my advice is that they can switch. I gave this review a rating of 9.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Excellent Real-Time Cloud Visibility with Intuitive Topology & Dependency Views
What do you like best about the product?
HyperGlance provides excellent real-time visibility into our cloud infrastructure and makes it simple for us to understand complex situations through visualization. We can simply relate resources and follow their service relationships inside the system thanks to the topology and dependency views. Compared to other methods, it helps us comprehend dependencies, misconfigurations, and affect areas in our system more faster, which in and of itself saves us operational time in numerous ways. Because it presents our infrastructure data in an organized and easy-to-navigate format, the tool also facilitates our daily practice of cloud system observation and troubleshooting.
What do you dislike about the product?
One downside is the initial setup and configuration. The UI could also be improved, and the pricing feels high.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
One of the biggest obstacles in managing modern cloud infrastructure is the lack of visibility and the sheer complexity involved, and Hyperglance helps BlockMosaic tackle both. When you’re working across multiple cloud platforms—such as AWS, Azure, or Google Cloud—it can be difficult to maintain a clear view of resources, dependencies, and overall system health. By providing a single, visual map of the entire infrastructure, Hyperglance simplifies monitoring and makes it easier to understand what’s connected to what.
Real-Time Infrastructure Cost Insights Made Easy
What do you like best about the product?
I like how I can get all the information of the cost of my infrastructure in real time
What do you dislike about the product?
Not much, it does my work accordingly to what I need
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
As we were experimenting and our size of cluster grew observation and keeping track of cost became difficult and Hyperglance solved our exact same problem
