Sold by
![Hyperglance: Up to 10000 Resources [GovCloud] logo](https://d7umqicpi7263.cloudfront.net/img/product/9df988ca-7be8-48ec-bb50-6f7c523c7668.png)
Hyperglance: Up to 10000 Resources [GovCloud]
Multi-cloud management platform. Optimize costs. Visualize inventory. Monitor compliance.
Reviews (81)
Aniket Wankhede
Centralized visibility has improved governance, reduced costs, and simplified compliance work
Reviewed on May 29, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
My primary use case with Hyperglance is gaining end-to-end visibility of our cloud and OpenShift infrastructure, and it helps us automatically discover resources, visualize architecture, monitor compliance, and identify cost optimization opportunities from its single dashboard.
Beyond just visualization, the main value Hyperglance brings is having a single source of truth for the environment, which helps reduce operational overhead, improve cloud governance, support compliance requirements, and enable better cost control. Automated infrastructure visualization reduces the effort required for documentation and audits.
What is most valuable?
The best features of Hyperglance are its real-time cloud visualization, cost optimization capabilities, compliance monitoring, and automation, with the standout aspect being that it combines architecture visibility, FinOps, security, and governance into a single platform that significantly improves visibility, troubleshooting, compliance management, and cost control for large cloud or OpenShift environments.
What I appreciate most about Hyperglance is that its real-time cloud visualization and automation features help make my day-to-day work easier by preventing human error and saving significant time. For example, the automated infrastructure visualization eliminates the need to manually create and maintain architecture diagrams, which can quickly become outdated. Having an accurate, real-time view of dependencies helps the team avoid mistakes when making changes or troubleshooting issues.
Beyond the technical features themselves, the biggest benefit is efficiency, as Hyperglance automates tasks that would otherwise require manual documentation, inventory tracking, and compliance reviews, saving time, improving accuracy, reducing the likelihood of configuration mistakes, and allowing engineers to focus on higher-value work instead of infrastructure discovery and reporting.
The biggest positive impact of Hyperglance on my organization is operational efficiency because it centralizes infrastructure visibility, cost management, and compliance monitoring into a single platform, which reduces manual effort, improves the accuracy of infrastructure documentation, helps identify unused resources, and supports proactive governance, allowing teams to spend less time on administrative tasks and more time delivering business value.
What needs improvement?
The main challenge I see with Hyperglance is not functionality but usability; it provides a lot of valuable information, but new users may need time to learn how to navigate and interpret the data effectively. Improvements in dashboard customization, advanced analytics, and deeper integrations would make the platform even more powerful.
The main improvement I would suggest for Hyperglance is making onboarding easier through guided setup, interactive tutorials, and role-specific dashboards. Hyperglance already provides powerful visibility and governance capabilities, but simplifying the learning process would help teams adopt the platform faster and maximize its value sooner. Additionally, predictive insights and business-level reporting would further enhance the user experience.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Hyperglance for the past six to seven months.
How are customer service and support?
Rating: 4
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Hyperglance would be to clearly define your objectives before implementing it. Whether your primary goal is cloud visibility, cost optimization, security and compliance, or governance, having clear priorities will help you get the most value from the platform.
I would rate this review an overall 8.Anuja Deore
Visual mapping has improved cost control and now simplifies audits and cross-team collaboration
Reviewed on May 28, 2026
Review from a verified AWS customer
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Hyperglance includes cloud inventory and its mapping, security posture management, architecture documentation, troubleshooting complex environments, and conducting compliance and operational audits.
Recently, I used Hyperglance during a cloud cost review after noticing a spike in AWS. It was quick to visualize unused EC2 instances and attached EBS volumes or over-provisioned resources across multiple accounts. Instead of tracing dependencies in the AWS console, we used the infrastructure map to identify orphan resources and clean them up, which reduced monthly costs and improved visibility for the ops team. Another standout use case was troubleshooting a connectivity issue between application tiers in AWS, where Hyperglance's dependency mapping made it much easier to trace security groups, subnets, and resources.
One of the things we found especially useful with Hyperglance is how it helps bridge the gap between technical and non-technical teams. The visual infrastructure maps make it much easier to explain our architecture, auto-dependencies, and risk areas during reviews or planning sessions. While using Hyperglance, it has also been valuable for onboarding new team members because they can understand the environment much faster without digging through multiple cloud resources.
For others who are looking into Hyperglance, I suggest starting with a clear use case. It delivers the most value when you focus on specific problems such as cloud cost optimization, dependency mapping for troubleshooting, or improving governance and compliance visibility.
What is most valuable?
One of the features that stands out the most for me is cost optimization, along with agentless and self-hosted deployment. When talking about cost optimization, Hyperglance identifies idle resources, right-sizing opportunities, and also has automated security and compliance checks and frameworks such as CIS, NIST, PCI DSS, and AWS Well-Architected. Many enterprises appreciate that the agentless and self-hosted option allows them to run it inside their own environment rather than relying on a free managed SaaS product.
Hyperglance has mainly helped us improve visibility and understanding of our cloud infrastructure. It also helps to find unused or over-provisioned resources that are easy to miss otherwise. From an operational perspective, onboarding new engineers and explaining the environment to stakeholders has become much easier because the infrastructure is visualized clearly instead of being spread across disconnected tools.
What needs improvement?
Some dashboards and visualizations can become cluttered at scale, so I believe more flexible filtering and cleaner navigation would help.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working in my current field for the last one and a half years.
What was our ROI?
We have seen measurable improvements in a few areas since adopting Hyperglance. The biggest impact has been on operational efficiency and cloud cost visibility. For example, during a recent infrastructure review, we identified several underutilized EC2 instances, unattached storage volumes, and outdated test resources that were overlooked across multiple AWS accounts. Cleaning those up reduced our monthly cloud spend by roughly ten to fifteen percent. On the operational side, troubleshooting time has improved noticeably because engineers can trace dependencies and visualize architecture much faster instead of manually piecing information together from native cloud consoles.
What other advice do I have?
Hyperglance's AI capabilities appear fairly reliable when it comes to infrastructure dependency mapping and identifying optimization opportunities because it is working from live cloud and configuration and telemetry data rather than purely generative AI outputs. In our experience, the recommendations around unused resources, topology relationships, and governance issues have generally been accurate and actionable. I rate Hyperglance a nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Sourabh S.
The Platform That Makes Cloud Management Practical . Making Multi-Cloud Management Feel Manageable
Reviewed on May 14, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Hyperglance is how it turns complex cloud infrastructure into something visually simple and actionable. Rather than just presenting raw data, it helps teams truly understand their cloud environment, quickly spot inefficiencies, and make smarter decisions in real time.
What do you dislike about the product?
One area Hyperglance could improve is that its broad range of features can feel overwhelming at first, particularly for smaller teams or for users who are new to cloud governance platforms. The sheer amount of data and the level of customization available are definitely powerful, but the learning curve can slow onboarding and make day-to-day adoption harder in the beginning.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
What I like most about Hyperglance is how it tackles the hidden complexity in modern cloud environments. In large, multi-cloud setups, teams often struggle to see where resources are running, who owns them, why costs are rising, or which configurations might introduce security risks. Hyperglance pulls all of that into a single, clear visual platform, combining real-time visibility with automation and cost intelligence so it’s easier to understand what’s happening across the environment.
Civic & Social Organization
Hyperglance Makes Complex Dependencies Clear with an Actionable Dashboard
Reviewed on May 13, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
As an engineer, I appreciate Hyperglance for how it automatically visualizes complex system dependencies in one clear, actionable dashboard, making it easier to understand what’s connected and where to focus.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hyperglance can start to feel cluttered at scale. When it renders thousands of resources, it can create "visual noice" that makes it harder for an engineer to quickly understand what they’re looking at.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance helps cut through multi-cloud chaos with AI-driven insights. It saves me time during audits and helps reduce costs, which ultimately improves my ROI.
Pablo C.
Clear visual cloud visibility for complex environments
Reviewed on May 05, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about Hyperglance is that it makes complex cloud environments much easier to understand visually. Instead of relying only on native cloud consoles, spreadsheets, or manual diagrams, Hyperglance can provide a more unified view of cloud resources, relationships, and architecture.
The visual diagrams and inventory views are especially useful because they help teams quickly understand what exists in the environment and how resources are connected. This is valuable for architects, engineers, security teams, and FinOps users who need to make decisions based on the actual state of the cloud.
I also like that Hyperglance combines visibility with practical operational use cases such as cost optimization, security and compliance monitoring, alerts, and automation. That makes it more useful than a static documentation tool because it can help identify risks, waste, and configuration issues in the live cloud environment.
Overall, the best part of Hyperglance is that it turns cloud complexity into something easier to explore, explain, and act on.
The visual diagrams and inventory views are especially useful because they help teams quickly understand what exists in the environment and how resources are connected. This is valuable for architects, engineers, security teams, and FinOps users who need to make decisions based on the actual state of the cloud.
I also like that Hyperglance combines visibility with practical operational use cases such as cost optimization, security and compliance monitoring, alerts, and automation. That makes it more useful than a static documentation tool because it can help identify risks, waste, and configuration issues in the live cloud environment.
Overall, the best part of Hyperglance is that it turns cloud complexity into something easier to explore, explain, and act on.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I dislike about Hyperglance is that the value depends heavily on how complex and well-organized the cloud environment already is. If the environment has inconsistent tagging, unclear ownership, unused resources, or weak governance, Hyperglance can expose those problems clearly, but it does not automatically solve the underlying process issues.
There can also be a learning curve for teams that are not used to thinking about cloud architecture visually. The diagrams and resource relationships are very useful, but users still need enough cloud knowledge to interpret what they are seeing and decide what action to take.
Another area for improvement is that teams may need time to tune alerts, rules, filters, and views so the platform highlights the most important issues without creating noise. In larger environments, the amount of information can be overwhelming at first, so the initial setup and configuration approach matters a lot.
Overall, I think Hyperglance is powerful, but it works best when the organization already has some cloud governance discipline and clear owners for acting on the insights it provides.
There can also be a learning curve for teams that are not used to thinking about cloud architecture visually. The diagrams and resource relationships are very useful, but users still need enough cloud knowledge to interpret what they are seeing and decide what action to take.
Another area for improvement is that teams may need time to tune alerts, rules, filters, and views so the platform highlights the most important issues without creating noise. In larger environments, the amount of information can be overwhelming at first, so the initial setup and configuration approach matters a lot.
Overall, I think Hyperglance is powerful, but it works best when the organization already has some cloud governance discipline and clear owners for acting on the insights it provides.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance helps solve the problem of cloud complexity and lack of visibility across cloud environments. In many organizations, cloud resources are spread across multiple accounts, subscriptions, regions, services, and teams, which makes it difficult to understand the full architecture, ownership, security posture, and cost impact from one place.
The main benefit is that Hyperglance gives teams a more visual and centralized way to understand what is running in the cloud and how resources are connected. This makes it easier to identify misconfigurations, unused or underutilized resources, potential security risks, and areas where cloud spend can be optimized.
It also helps reduce the need for manual cloud diagrams and spreadsheets. Instead of relying on documentation that can quickly become outdated, teams can work from a more current view of the environment. That improves communication between architecture, engineering, security, and operations teams.
Overall, Hyperglance benefits us by improving cloud visibility, making architecture easier to explain, supporting better governance, and helping teams act faster on cost, security, and operational issues.
The main benefit is that Hyperglance gives teams a more visual and centralized way to understand what is running in the cloud and how resources are connected. This makes it easier to identify misconfigurations, unused or underutilized resources, potential security risks, and areas where cloud spend can be optimized.
It also helps reduce the need for manual cloud diagrams and spreadsheets. Instead of relying on documentation that can quickly become outdated, teams can work from a more current view of the environment. That improves communication between architecture, engineering, security, and operations teams.
Overall, Hyperglance benefits us by improving cloud visibility, making architecture easier to explain, supporting better governance, and helping teams act faster on cost, security, and operational issues.
Logistics and Supply Chain
Hyperglance gave us greater control over our cloud infrastructure
Reviewed on Apr 23, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
I tried Hyperglance in a work environment where we needed to have greater control over our cloud infrastructure, and the truth is that the experience was quite positive.
What do you dislike about the product?
Regarding the price, it is not a cheap solution, but if you manage a moderately large infrastructure, I think it pays off relatively easily thanks to the optimization it allows.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Cost control. It helped me identify resources that were oversized or directly unused. It's not that it works magic, but it does give you the necessary information to make smarter decisions and save.
reviewer2818368
Unified cloud visibility has improved cost control and onboarding but needs simpler interface and pricing
Reviewed on Apr 21, 2026
Review provided by PeerSpot
What is our primary use case?
Our main use case for Hyperglance is cloud analysis, which helps us visualize the infrastructure and serves as a cost-effective cloud management system for our organization.
We initially faced an issue with AWS where costs were very high and tracking dependencies was difficult. We switched to Hyperglance to have a single view of the cloud, which addresses costs, architecture, and dependencies together. This allows us to consolidate our cloud infrastructure from AWS and Kubernetes into one unified location.
What is most valuable?
Hyperglance provides visibility that creates a unified view of the entire cloud system, allowing us to debug much faster than we were able to initially. With this visibility, new engineers being onboarded find it easier to understand the infrastructure. Cost optimization is also a significant benefit we gain from Hyperglance, as we are able to see unused resources, which aids in budgeting.
Beyond easier onboarding and faster debugging, Hyperglance automatically identifies idle servers, reducing costs by shutting them down and creating Jira tickets automatically.
The unified view offered by Hyperglance is a huge benefit that we have been able to see. These features stand out for us because it becomes easier to make decisions when all of the information is in a single, simple, unified view. This simplicity makes it easier to debug and for new team members to understand the infrastructure, as they can see budget costs and consider options regarding budgeting, ultimately increasing capacity and speeding up decision-making.
Hyperglance is greatly scalable because, as soon as we scale it to a greater architecture or a larger number of servers, it quickly identifies unused resources, making debugging faster and enhancing budget tracking. We also receive automatic anomaly alerts, so I would say it performs very well in terms of scalability.
What needs improvement?
Hyperglance has a multi-cloud visualization system and automates many things; however, a downside is that the user interface feels somewhat complex when you start. When we first began using Hyperglance, the user interface felt complex initially, but once you become familiar with it, it becomes easier to use. It is powerful, but it is not very easy for a beginner to adapt to.
The user interface of Hyperglance might feel complex in the initial stages, and I would also say that it can be somewhat expensive for small teams or early-stage startups. Hyperglance could be costly for someone with simple infrastructure. Therefore, I think the cost aspect and the user interface could be improved.
Hyperglance is a powerful tool when it comes to cloud operations, functioning as a control system. However, for an early-stage startup that does not have much reliance or is not heavily dependent on cloud operations, it might not be a good option for them. If the cost could be reduced and onboarding made a little easier, early-stage startups would benefit greatly from Hyperglance.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Hyperglance for nine months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Hyperglance is stable in its performance.
How are customer service and support?
I have not faced any issues that required customer support, so I cannot comment on that. However, I think the product is really good, and we have not had many issues that would necessitate support.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Initially, we were using AWS before switching to Hyperglance.
What was our ROI?
We have seen a return on investment from Hyperglance, as we are now able to identify waste very efficiently. We have achieved approximately twenty percent cost reduction due to the shutdown of idle servers, and we have also seen approximately eight to ten percent improvement in time, providing significant benefits from Hyperglance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The cost was pretty steep, and we were not initially very certain about taking Hyperglance due to its price. However, it is a very powerful tool, and I have not been the one handling the pricing and licensing aspects.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I evaluated other options before choosing Hyperglance, but I cannot elaborate on this as I am not familiar with those specific options.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Hyperglance is to first assess their team's needs. If there is a small team that does not rely heavily on cloud services and does not need multi-cloud complexity, they might be fine without it. However, if they have a heavy reliance on cloud services and need visibility, automated shutdown of idle servers, and budget tracking, I would definitely suggest Hyperglance. Although it might be complex initially, once you become familiar with it, it is an excellent tool.
For Fintech teams or those who rely heavily on cloud services, Hyperglance might be a great tool, even though the user interface might feel complex at first. I would rate this review a seven overall.
Accounting
Clear Real-Time Cloud Cost Visibility with Actionable Optimizations
Reviewed on Apr 18, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
Hyperglance gives clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and resource usage.
It identifies waste and suggests actionable optimizations automatically.
Best suited for multi-cloud or complex environments where cost and security insights need to be unified.
It identifies waste and suggests actionable optimizations automatically.
Best suited for multi-cloud or complex environments where cost and security insights need to be unified.
What do you dislike about the product?
Hyperglance can feel like overkill for smaller setups with limited cloud usage. There’s also a bit of a learning curve before you can fully take advantage of all its features. Pricing can be on the higher side as well, especially when compared to native cloud cost tools.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Hyperglance provides clear, real-time visibility into cloud costs and overall resource usage. It helps pinpoint waste and automatically recommends practical, actionable optimizations. In my experience, it’s best suited for multi-cloud or more complex environments where you want cost and security insights brought together in one unified view.
Udit P.
Interactive Cloud Visualizations and Cost Optimization Insights
Reviewed on Apr 16, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Hyperglance is its visualization of complex cloud architecture through interactive diagrams. It makes our infrastructure much easier to understand. Also, the cost optimization feature is very good—its insights help us identify and terminate unused resources, which helps us save on our cloud costs.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I didn’t like about Hyperglance is that the platform feels complex, and I think there’s a learning curve for new users when they first start using it. Also, the initial setup took some time to get everything configured correctly. On top of that, I think pricing can be a concern for small teams that are just starting out.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The main problem it solves is understanding complex cloud architectures by providing a clear visual view of all resources and their relationships. It also helps with cost management: using Hyperglance, I can identify unused, untagged, and zombie resources that can be terminated, which saves a lot of cost.
Hiten M.
Clear Cloud Infrastructure Visuals That Make Issues Easy to Spot
Reviewed on Apr 16, 2026
Review provided by G2
What do you like best about the product?
i like the clear visual representation of the cloud infrastructure that makes it easy to understand complex environments and spot issues fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
the interface is bit complex at first for new users and some advance features take time to fully understand
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It solves the problem of managing complex cloud environments and understanding them. It provides clear visuals for infrastructure, cost, and security, which helps me quickly identify issues, reduce risks, and make better decisions.