My use case for OneLogin has many uses including SSO, desktop SSO, multi-factor authentication, advanced directory integration, access to other applications, smart factor authentication, role-based access control, and identity lifecycle management from start to end, including user onboarding, user updating, and user offboarding processes.

The best features I appreciate most about the solution are OneLogin SSO and advanced directory integration. OneLogin SSO integration has almost 6,000 pre-integrated applications, which allows users to access multiple applications with just a single set of credentials. OneLogin provides seamless integration with existing directory services such as LDAP, Active Directory, and cloud directories such as G Suite and Workday.

OneLogin has a role-based access control feature that provides role support, allowing admins to define roles and assign specific permissions to users based on their roles within the organization. I use smart factor authentication to adjust authentication policies in real-time. For multi-factor authentication, OneLogin has many authentication factors. In India, we primarily use one-time passwords, email, SMS, and web authentication for biometric factors. We also use third-party authenticators such as Google Authenticator, Duo Security, RSA SecurID, and YubiKey.

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability, flexibility in configuration, and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year. OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. There is a feature limitation with mapping, as OneLogin does not provide one-to-all mapping. For client deployment, we need to create separate mappings for each request, and we cannot use the same mapping for multiple requests.

Other areas that have room for improvement are related to API limitations. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration. These are the main limitations I have identified with OneLogin.

I have been using OneLogin by One Identity for almost three years.

The authentication process is good, but sometimes the responsiveness to requests for enhancement is very slow. I sometimes face issues with platform stability and limited API availability. I experience downtimes two to three times per year.

I find scalability to be lacking a bit when it comes to maximum customers, and I would rate it around 6.5.

OneLogin's support team is sometimes very slow to respond. If a client requires more APIs, such as 5,000 or 6,000, OneLogin charges more. The API rate limits by default or the standard limit should provide more than 5,000. Additionally, OneLogin could provide more flexibility in configuration and improved platform stability.

I have done almost eight to nine client deployments, and the solution is purchased mostly through a partner project.

The deployment is moderate. For Active Directory integration, if you are going to test it, it takes one day for testing and one day for production deployment, so I would say two to three days for product deployment including all applications and user onboarding. If there is a customized HR solution requiring automation and end-to-end workflows, the implementation for production deployment would take around one to two weeks.

I have done almost eight to nine client deployments, and the solution is purchased mostly through a partner project.

OneLogin charges four dollars per user. For the advanced professional feature, OneLogin provides around seven to eight dollars for clients who want advanced features such as lifecycle management and HR-driven identity. For the expert premium plan for clients who want all professional features, smart factor authentication, and dedicated admin features, it costs almost nine to ten dollars per user. OneLogin provides customized solutions that vary based on customization and client features. The cost is less compared to Okta and Entra ID.

OneLogin requires maintenance in the sense of cloud storage, and they have different pricing for that. The cost varies depending on the clients.

When I compare OneLogin by One Identity to other authentication and SSO tools, I find that there are other actors such as Entra ID and Okta that are similar products. All three products are used for application integration, security, and integration. OneLogin is mostly for small and mid-sized businesses, whereas Okta is used for multi-cloud and vendor-neutral setups. Entra ID is only for setups that have an Azure setup or Microsoft 365.

OneLogin has almost 6,000 pre-built applications for SSO, whereas Okta has 7,000, and Entra ID has around that number, but it provides deep native integration only for Microsoft 365 or Azure. The admin experience with OneLogin is very simple and straightforward, and anyone can deploy OneLogin. However, Okta is highly modern and polished, and Entra ID provides a similar kind of feature. Cost-wise, OneLogin is often more budget-friendly and is less costly than Okta and Entra ID.

My experience of the solution's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating applications is seamless. I have experience as both an admin and a developer. As an admin, I manage user lifecycle management processes and application onboarding based on SAML, OIDC, RADIUS authentication, and OAuth protocols. I onboard different applications in OneLogin based on different SSO protocols and manage user lifecycle management as it is integrated with various Workday directories, Active Directories, and CSV onboarding of users. As a developer, I use Smart Hooks and their client SDK to integrate multiple APIs based on Python, and I manage users, apps, and roles based on OneLogin API.

The number of users that work with OneLogin in my company depends on the clients. For banking-related clients, OneLogin has almost 20,000 users. For education-related clients, it is around 10,000 to 15,000. Overall, I have worked with around one to two lakh users in my three years of experience with OneLogin.

I am a partner of One Identity, specifically OneLogin, as I was at Grade Software Pvt. Ltd., which is a Pune-based organization in Pune, India. We bought OneLogin, and we deployed multiple client projects as a solution implementer or solution partner. My company has about 10 to 15 specialists, specifically 15 engineers.

Maintenance is easy. My impressions of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality are that OneLogin is used for secure access to campus resources including data and apps. It ensures fast access and easy authentication while blocking regular or unauthorized access. OneLogin allows third-party integration, making it better. It is a comprehensive identity and access management solution designed to streamline workplace authentication and authorization. This feature on this platform enables users to access multiple applications with a single set of credentials and provides solutions for admins with granular control over permissions, security policies, and user provisioning.

I have used the adaptive login flows with intelligent AI, specifically in the adaptive login flow feature in OneLogin where we need to set configuration for the adaptive feature and add one to two devices to test it. Once it works, adaptive authentication comes with different credentials if a user has them. When a user logs in with standard credentials such as username, user ID, email ID, and password, it sometimes makes them vulnerable to cyber attacks. We can implement risk-based authentication in OneLogin by creating a profile for each user that includes information such as the user's geographical location, their different role, and a registered device. Each time someone tries to authenticate, the request is evaluated and assigned a risk score. Depending on that risk score, the user may be required to provide an additional credential. If the risk score is high, we can add additional multi-factor authentication. If the user passes, the user can access the application.

My advice for others looking to implement this product is that I can recommend it based on the product features. If you want OneLogin Desktop, VLDAP, RADIUS integration, or user lifecycle management processes made easy, I can recommend OneLogin for small-base or medium-base organizations. I would rate this product 8.5 out of 10.

My main use case for OneLogin is that it has really enhanced our security in my organization, especially when it comes to password protection for all our applications. It is a great tool that is used company-wide in my organization for security purposes of our applications. Every employee in my company uses OneLogin, and it helps us secure and store credentials with strong long passwords, which are a must for security nowadays. However, it is almost impossible for a human to remember them, and storing them in notes is a security breach by itself. OneLogin comes in and encrypts all the sensitive data before saving it. OneLogin also gives us easy access whenever we need to log into our applications easily.

The best features OneLogin offers include ease of use for users, connection to Active Directory, and secure login for all applications.

Out of those features, all are great because this tool is very easy to use with a very flexible and intuitive user-friendly interface. This tool has really made it very easy for us to log in using one password for all our applications, which has simplified how we log in, hence saving a lot of time, and it has enhanced security. There is no reset of applications nowadays since we started using OneLogin.

OneLogin has positively impacted my organization since this tool has been very helpful. We have seen more security, simplicity when it comes to log in, and more time to be productive for everyone in my organization since we are not wasting time trying to log into different applications.

I have seen specific outcomes or results, such as a reduction in password reset requests and improved productivity metrics. Since many employees were forgetting their passwords and asking for resets, it would give our tech team a hard time. However, since we started using OneLogin, everything is now simplified to one long password that is easy to remember and keeps our security very safe. We have also saved a lot of time, as we are not logging into each different application. We have been able to save sixty-five to seventy percent of time, and we have also seen enhanced security overall.

OneLogin could be improved if there were easy configuration options. Additionally, enhancing the help portal would be beneficial.

I would appreciate more resources online when it comes to training or the onboarding process as it would be helpful.

I have been using OneLogin for at least four years and some few months.

OneLogin is relatively very stable. I have not encountered any lagging or downtime so far.

OneLogin's scalability is very good since it grows with my organization's needs. It can handle my organization's needs, and it has been a great tool in that aspect.

The customer support has been very proactive and dedicated. The few times that I have reached out to them, they were reachable via phone call or live chat, and they have definitely found solutions for every issue that I had.

I previously used a different solution before OneLogin, which was Okta Identity Cloud.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that the pricing is affordable and cost-effective. The setting is very easy because of the user-friendly and intuitive user interface. Customer support plays a very huge role in assisting with any questions about settings or anything.

I have seen a return on investment, and I can share relevant metrics with you such as improved security in all our applications in my organization. Through the simplification of the login process for our end users, we have seen a large amount of time saved and increased productivity of users, which indirectly helps us achieve higher profit goals.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been that the pricing is affordable and cost-effective. The setting is very easy because of the user-friendly and intuitive user interface. Customer support plays a very huge role in assisting with any questions about settings or anything.

Before choosing OneLogin, I evaluated other options, including Microsoft Azure Active Directory.

A quick specific example of how I use OneLogin in my daily work is that the day before, we had to remember every password for every application, and it was somehow forgetful. Some employees would forget, and requesting a reset of the application would take time and would really give our tech team a hard time to reset and forget the password. So we decided to go for OneLogin to centralize all the passwords, and it created one long password which is easy to remember and easy to log in. This has really simplified the login for any application. We are able to access them even when working remotely easily.

The GUI is very simple and user-friendly. It saves a lot of time by remembering the credentials and logging them once. It is easy to implement as a SAML SSO application where it provides reasonable pricing plans. So it is very cost-effective. The support is very friendly and quick to resolve any issue.

Based on my experience, I use the solution's Smart Factor Authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time depending on the risk score associated with the login attempt, and I assess Smart Factor Authentication as effective for balancing security with usability. The authentication process allows all users to access multiple applications with one set of login credentials easily. It enables users to have all services registered with the account and allows all journeys from implementation to end-user experience seamlessly.

My impression of the solution's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is that it is very seamless and time-saving.

My impression of the user identity synchronization across directories functionality is great.

I have used the Single Sign-On feature, and the integration with third-party authentication providers was seamless.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is that it is a great tool that helps with one set of login credentials, removing the risk of security concerns when it comes to simplification of login processes for end users, and improves user productivity. OneLogin is deployed in my organization on-premises. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

My main use case for OneLogin is app aggregation and SSO. I use OneLogin for app aggregation, which is utilized for a single point of access, so it is used in facilitation of SSO.

My main use case fits into my team's workflow as it reduces the work, decreases the time required, and increases the flexibility of the team.

The best features OneLogin offers in my experience are password vaulting and one-click termination to prevent unauthorized access.

Password vaulting and one-click termination have made it safer for our team, as passwords can be saved in a vault that is secured safely and one-click termination helps us remove dormant accounts, making these features very helpful for us.

OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by increasing security features and making our security wall more robust as well as preventing unauthorized access from dormant accounts, making our system safer than ever before.

OneLogin is a robust platform, but there is scope for improvement as there are some glitches, connectivity glitches, and some outages that need to be improved. The outages and glitches cause a hindrance in our work and lead to time wastage.

I have been using OneLogin for the last one year.

OneLogin is stable.

OneLogin is scalable according to our organization's needs, so it is quite scalable.

Customer support is good, but it needs some improvement.

My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was good, as the pricing was not very expensive and it is manageable.

I have not evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, as it was the first one I decided to demo, and I selected it on the first attempt only.

The features that are valuable about OneLogin are the ones I mentioned. I have noticed specific outcomes since using OneLogin, such as reduced incidents of password hacking and threats from various hackers.

User identity synchronization across directories is a good feature that I use, and it helps me identify which user has been given access to what. The user experience of OneLogin is very good, as it provides a seamless experience, although sometimes there are lags. Overall, it is a seamless experience.

HR-driven identity management plays a very important role, as whenever HR assigns a new employee a user ID, I use OneLogin for that, making it very useful and safer for us. I have saved time with this software.

OneLogin is good, value-for-money software that needs improvement on some glitches, but overall, it is a value-for-money solution. On a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin an eight because of the benefits that OneLogin provides.

I did not use OneLogin in a customer phase. My company wanted me to learn about it because I recently joined the company. I used it for about one month for training. I took the trainings with some trainers from OneLogin and then applied the total course of OneLogin and received certification. I have not used it in a customer phase yet. It depends on the project I am assigned to, but until now I have not used it in a real-life scenario.

The most valuable thing about OneLogin is the user interface. It is very simple and very clear for users to understand, and not only technical persons can work with it. Non-technical persons can also use it because the user interface is very simple and we did not have to write a lot of lines of code while making any configurations. It is one of my favorite SSO tools that I trained on. I have used other SSO tools as well, but OneLogin is one of my favorite tools I trained with.

From what I studied, I did not face any issues with OneLogin. However, if there were multiple documentations about the technical points and what each tab on the GUI is used for, it would be very helpful for others who want to learn, because I did not find a lot of resources about it on the internet. I used the admin essential document and tried to learn from the videos which were in the course itself. The course was very good, but I need more information and more documented parts because the course is not available for all users to learn from. Users just need to be assigned to the course before they are able to access the content. Many of my colleagues at work, when they learned that I took the certification for using OneLogin, want to learn but they were not assigned to the course itself to learn from. If there were any available documentation related to the product, I think it would be a very useful resource.

If there were some pictures from the GUI in the documentation part to illustrate where things are and what they are in the GUI, it would be helpful. The steps are in the documentation, but if we support the steps with pictures from the GUI, it will be more interactive for users.

I used OneLogin for about one month for training.

I did not face any stability issues while trying to log in to OneLogin.

OneLogin is a good scalable solution and there are no problems with it while using it.

I tried to use another tool in SSO and used one of them in my real project. I took training about both of them at the same time. However, I found that OneLogin's user interface is simpler than the other one. Although the admin essentials document does not have all the information about OneLogin, it was very useful for me and it has the steps for doing the technical parts. The steps were very clear and it has steps for every point in OneLogin when you want to make something. If you continue the documentation for all the product well, I think it will be perfect. The other tool's documentation was very difficult and very confusing for me. I preferred the OneLogin documentation.

OneLogin is easier than other tools. For me it was very easy. When I took the headlines from the instructor, then I returned to the documentation and watched the videos. It was very easy for me. I took the certification in less than one month because I had other jobs to do while studying.

I joined the technical discussions and worked on the technical part only. I did not join in the business discussion or go into the licensing and other details.

I would give OneLogin a rating of nine out of ten.

I was the super administrator for the test account regarding OneLogin use cases. I set up an organization, established some departments, and assigned policies to each department to check OneLogin's capability.

OneLogin is easy to use and manage, which is one of the best features.

It offers Single Sign-On, and OneLogin authentication application works with Single Sign-On and multifactor authentication both activated.

It is very easy to integrate with third-party authentication providers through the Single Sign-On feature. There are a few steps to follow, and OneLogin has shared documentation on the process. You have to visit the application directory, click on a new application, set up its logo and metadata, authentication, encrypted codes, and then the application starts authenticating and Single Sign-On starts working.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I used OneLogin authentication to adjust authentication flows in real-time depending on the risk score to set up the IPOU. It was very simple, but it lacked enterprise-level features like push notification, which makes authentication very easy and seamless. It has only basic features, such as code running, and I have to look at the code and authenticate.

This is also a concern for end-users. Every time they have to sign in, they will need to open their smartphone, open OneLogin authentication application, copy the code, and enter it into the laptop screen to authenticate.

I have been working in my current field for around three and a half to four years.

During the trial period, which was for thirty days, I never faced any downtime. OneLogin was up and running every time I tried to log in and use the application in the web portal.

There are many downsides. OneLogin is designed for small businesses, not for big enterprises, which is why it has limited features. It does not have those features that enterprises request or would like to have from OneLogin. It is not that scalable because it is intended for smaller businesses. It does not have the functionality to add multiple enterprise-level applications. Although OneLogin has many applications available, I cannot add multiple enterprise-level applications and advanced features to OneLogin setup screen.

I did not feel the need to contact technical support. Everything was straightforward. Everything went well, and I never felt a need to contact them.

OneLogin initial deployment was straightforward.

It did not take long to set up OneLogin, but if you have a set of policies to implement, it obviously takes time to set up organizational units, integrate directories, and set up all policies per department. It takes time on every application you set up in your organization, but it was not difficult and did not take much of my time.

Since that was a test environment, I was the only one to set up OneLogin administration. I could have allowed some other users as administrators to help me out, but I was the only one who set it up and everything went smoothly.

I have used many alternatives in the market, and the best one is Okta.

Okta is a huge enterprise-level application. It provides Single Sign-On, provides integration with enterprise-level applications, and also those applications which do not have Single Sign-On capabilities using web authentication system. So it has much more than OneLogin.

If I am looking for a solution for small or mid-businesses on a scale of one to ten, I would rate OneLogin seven and a half to eight and a half. My overall rating for this product is eight.

The best feature of OneLogin is that it is easy to integrate. We found that it integrated seamlessly with our Office 365 and Salesforce, making it the best feature.

Beyond integration, we receive monitoring, but I feel that integration is significantly better than other identity tools when compared to Okta and Azure AD.

My impression of OneLogin is that it is smooth when providing a seamless user experience for signing in and authenticating applications. We do not have to use multiple user IDs and passwords, as we have created one set of users, making it very smooth and efficient to manage user privileges.

My impressions of the Identity Synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is that it is seamless and syncs every identity seamlessly.

The areas for improvement in OneLogin include better analytics since we do not have very end-to-end visualization of user access logs. Additionally, policy customization needs improvement as we cannot assign specific policies to specific customers. The admin dashboard is cleaner but can be improved, and from my point of view, it is not as user-friendly compared to others such as Okta and Azure AD.

In my comparison of OneLogin with other solutions and vendors, I state that it provides us smooth integration, as it integrates easily, but it lacks deeper end-to-end analytics and broader integration support, which Okta previously provided. Okta also offers deeper analytics and its admin dashboard is cleaner, but the user-friendliness and integration are smoother with OneLogin.

I do not rate it a ten because from the policy perspective, there needs to be improvement. We cannot give fine-grained access to users, and the policy is not mature enough.

The advantages of customer identity and access management in OneLogin for external clients include cutting costs since we were using Okta before, along with providing a seamless user experience. When deploying Okta, we faced multiple issues with logging and user synchronization as users did not sync to multiple identities.

OneLogin is easy to maintain, and since it has not been that long since it was deployed, approximately nine months, we have not had to perform any maintenance on OneLogin.

When considering the pricing of OneLogin, I find it to be cost-efficient, especially when comparing it heavily with Okta, which is much more expensive.

OneLogin has not had Vigilance AI or adaptive login flows enabled because of compliance audits. I do not have complete knowledge of HR's role in managing employee identities. As a technical engineer, I have deployed and maintained the solution, but regarding HR, I do not have the complete picture of how they integrate since it is a separate HR team.

My advice to others looking into OneLogin is that if they want a solution that can easily integrate with their current infrastructure, then I would advise them to consider OneLogin because it integrates easily with multiple solutions and logins. My overall review rating for OneLogin is nine out of ten.

I have been using OneLogin for a year now for its access management capabilities and as an authenticator.

We integrate with customers that want MFA, so we are mostly using OneLogin for it.

For a customer who needed MFA, they wanted to integrate OneLogin as an additional way to authenticate to Safeguard for external employees. We basically integrated OneLogin as an authentication provider to Safeguard. To connect via the Safeguard SPP UI, customers would be redirected to OneLogin.

OneLogin's best features are its MFA capabilities as well as making it easier to access different applications depending on the user.

The user interface of OneLogin is really well done, and you can easily perform other custom integrations.

OneLogin positively impacts our customers because they now have a solution that they can trust, and coming from One Identity, this trust is really strong. They are being impacted positively because there are no bugs and no major issues with OneLogin. It is fast and seamless.

OneLogin has definitely impacted positively and saved time. It has also strengthened security because we mostly use it for MFA, and it also made onboarding easier because you can automatically onboard multiple users. You can seamlessly integrate applications in no time.

OneLogin's ability to provide a seamless end-user experience for signing in and authenticating to needed applications is impressive. It is fast, works well, and does not have any major issues or major flaws. I appreciate that it is fast.

OneLogin can be improved in its custom integrations as an authorization provider.

Documentation for OneLogin can be improved as well.

For the single sign-on feature, some third-party authentication providers that do not fit in a basic template were difficult because you had to look up documentation on both. OneLogin's documentation is not the best, but for the major ones, it was really easy and really fast.

You should build the documentation a little better and more clearly because it is currently a convoluted mess, but that goes for every One Identity product.

I have been using OneLogin for a year now for its access management capabilities and as an authenticator.

There is no downtime or major issues with OneLogin. It is overall stable.

OneLogin is built to scale much like every other One Identity product. We have not faced any major issues trying to scale it for different organizations and a bigger client base.

I interact with OneLogin's support team for our clients, and it was a good experience overall. One Identity support is adequate, but you have to wait a little bit because they are not direct.

I previously used Octa before OneLogin because it was not supported by our other programs.

We did not evaluate other options before choosing OneLogin. The client specifically asked for it because they had a long-standing relationship with One Identity.

General impressions in the company that we are integrating OneLogin with are really positive. Before, they were using another program for MFA, and they were really dissatisfied with it, so the user experience was overall positive. OneLogin saved a lot of time because it is faster.

OneLogin's customer support receives a rating of seven out of ten.

My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to use it. OneLogin scales really well in smaller and bigger environments, offering different options depending on what you want to do, such as using it as an access management tool or as an authentication method.

I rate OneLogin an overall score of eight.

OneLogin is our main identity and access management tool. We use Active Roles for user provisioning, which allows us to delegate the provisioning to other people. OneLogin manages user access permissions and includes creating mailboxes.

OneLogin's best features are the whole package, which includes the combination of the integration with Active Directory, user provisioning, and the graphical user interface. OneLogin has positively impacted our organization by saving us money because we automated a lot of things with One Identity.

OneLogin could be improved with more add-ins for integration with Entra ID and Exchange Online. I would appreciate more options to add to One Identity, such as Entra ID provisioning and Exchange Online mailboxes directly, and maybe integration with Graph.

I have been using OneLogin for about 10 years.

OneLogin seems stable to me. There are sometimes CPU usage peaks when certain scripts perform, but overall, it is stable.

I do not manage OneLogin's scalability, as another department handles this.

I have not had any experiences with customer support, but one of my colleagues did, and he was quite satisfied.

Before OneLogin, we did not have any other solution; there were just manual scripts.

I did not handle the pricing, setup cost, and licensing aspects, as they were managed by another department.

I think we evaluated other options before choosing OneLogin, but that was before my time.

OneLogin is nice and easy to use. I would rate OneLogin an eight out of ten because nothing is a ten for me; everything can be improved, and this is quite acceptable. More integration with other solutions, especially Entra ID, would contribute to a higher rating. Based on my experience, the user identity synchronization across directories functionality in OneLogin is acceptable. Regarding OneLogin providing a smooth experience for end users when they are signing in and accessing applications, end users are not really logging in through One Identity, but One Identity provides them all the necessary groups to log into their applications, so they do not notice anything. The experience is smooth. My advice to others looking into using OneLogin is to get skilled people who can work with OneLogin and who can script. My overall rating for OneLogin is eight out of ten.