Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

Reviews from AWS customer

4 AWS reviews

External reviews

21 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


4-star reviews ( Show all reviews )

    Kevin Abdi

Improved ticket tracking has increased SLA performance and supports detailed asset management

  • February 18, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is for ticketing and asset management, as well as for change management requests. I have also been optimizing other features on BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.

For example, I use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management when there is an issue from the user's point of view, whether on the user's side, the store, or the headquarters. Users will create a ticket and log it, and then I follow up on the issue using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management to track it. For assets, I use it to track asset movement and to correlate any tickets if they are regarding the asset.

What is most valuable?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has positively impacted my organization so far, especially for ticketing. In fact, for ticketing, I am still using it as a point of benchmark on how I service the user, whether in the stores or in the headquarters. For assets, I am still populating the data and ensuring that the asset is being properly logged and monitored.

I have seen changes in response time, efficiency, and user satisfaction since I started using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management. I can monitor my tickets and services, and I am currently trying to minimize breaches in my SLA. I get a lot of benefits from the platform.

Almost more than ninety percent of the tickets are properly within my SLA. That is not good, as I expect ninety-nine percent of SLA, but I am slowly improving.

What needs improvement?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management can be improved because it has a legacy system that needs enhancement. The interface needs improvement because it is not very user-friendly. I have access to so many interfaces that sometimes it is confusing. Additionally, the AI needs to be improved as well.

The AI is still new, and how it can monitor the whole system is not as advanced as I expected. I take note mostly on the interface, because there are so many front-ends, especially for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management. The company needs to improve it.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for more than two years.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management's scalability is very scalable, and I can add more as needed.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support is adequate and within their set SLA, but they need to be more communicative and quicker in responding to my queries.

How would you rate customer service and support?

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I previously used a different solution, but it was a small one. I switched because I needed more capabilities on IT service management.

How was the initial setup?

I think the experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is quite easy. The pricing is quite fair, but perhaps because I actually buy the whole module, I think for the starter, it is quite expensive. I think the company needs to separate the modules as I need them. Setup cost is acceptable, and licensing is quite easy.

What was our ROI?

I have not seen a return on investment yet because I am still in development, so I do not see any return on investment. However, I do see some monitoring capabilities. I can monitor my performance, which is quite important for me.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

I did not evaluate other options before choosing BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management. I tried to use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.

What other advice do I have?

My advice to others looking into using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is to first know what you need from BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, and then it is better to learn about the features so that you can optimize it. I would rate this product an eight out of ten.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?


    Mourad Ali

Integrated service workflows have unified enterprise support and have improved digital experiences

  • February 11, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

We are a partner for OpenText and BMC, and this is our main professional service delivery. We are the professional service delivery arm for both of them.

I am responsible for the ITSM products, such as OpenText SMAX, Helix ITSM, and others.

It is not only ITSM, it is an ESM as well.

It is mainly the DWP. And the ITSM modules, IAM, incident, request, change, and others. Mainly for the ESM, the most beneficial layer is the interfacing layer of the DWP, the Digital Workplace. And actually the advanced service catalog.

The underlying work orders and workflows of the service catalog are a mainly critical point for the ESM and even the interface for the ITSM tool as well.

What is most valuable?

Recently, it is good. It is promising. It is still not totally amazing. Even for BMC, for OpenText, for ServiceNow, for all the vendors, it is a booming technology. And all vendors are trying to integrate it inside their ITSM tools. Still, there are some limitations, especially related to the Arabic language, especially for the Middle East. The LLM language model and LLM models are not supporting Arabic for most of the tools. So this is a weakness. However, I can see some vendors are still working on this point right now because there are LLM models in the market supporting Arabic.

For automation, you have multiple tools depending on the vendor. For example, for OpenText, we have an OO integration, Operation Orchestration with SMAX. For BMC, we have Control-M as well, and can automate some items. All vendors as well inside their portfolio are considering the automation. It is not a native function inside the tool, but actually within the portfolio with seamless integration. It fits for purpose.

What needs improvement?

It is perfect, unless there is the support of the Arabic language. Supporting the Arabic language is the critical point, especially for ESM more than ITSM. Because for the ITSM, most of the IT staff can handle the English or any language besides Arabic. But when you are targeting the ESM, you are targeting the HR team, the finance team, the maintenance team. Not all these teams treat with English terminologies or report their cases with English. At this moment, the Arabic language or their native Arabic language should be considered and it will be more important inside the chatbots. I would prefer to chat with my own language.

Enhancing AI support for the Arabic languages, enhancing the automation of the ticket, and automation of the ticket workflows would make it simpler for implementation and simpler for enhancements. Adding more capabilities for adding more flexibility of the customization is important. This is not only for BMC, even for OpenText, even for ServiceNow. As long as you are moving to a low-code platform, you are limiting my capability to customize. The solution will be fit for purpose perfectly for a low-customization environment. However, it is a limitation for the low-code environments. All low-code environments have limitations when customizing. When you compare, for example, in OpenText, when you compare SMAX to the legacy Service Manager, Service Manager has more capabilities for customization, more than SMAX. This is the same between Helix and Remedy. Overall, BMC still has a very powerful way to customize. It still has a very good customization capability.

For how long have I used the solution?

For the last 10 years.

How are customer service and support?

All vendors have several plans for support, for supporting models. From premium to standard, advanced. It depends on the supporting package you purchased. For example, if you are talking about premier support in OpenText or BMC or whatever, and you have a dedicated resource, the response time will be much better. The initial phases of investigation will be very short because you have a dedicated, assigned resource who is understanding your environment, already knows your environment, already knows your understanding and your needs, so it will be much better.

Also, for the support of BMC, especially for BMC Helix on cloud as a software-as-a-service, the support will be faster than the response in investigating an on-prem solution. This is crucial for the troubleshooting of the infrastructure or a bug. For example, if a system is down totally, I am not talking about software enhancements or an issue inside the tool itself, but talking about if a system is down or if you have a critical ticket, BMC Helix SaaS is very good for support, more than support for on-prem. This is the same for ServiceNow, same for OpenText, same for everything. It is about the SaaS supporting model because the resource is already understanding or well-understanding the infrastructure deployment that happened on the cloud, on their cloud.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

All vendors can compete with their pricing. All vendors for the same class, for example, if you are talking about the world-class such as BMC, ServiceNow, OpenText, all of them can compete in front of each other. I am not talking about the same price for medium-scale such as ManageEngine or smaller tools. But for the same scale of the vendors, almost all of them are near to each other.

What other advice do I have?



    Abhishek Maske

Improved cross-team coordination and incident resolution has streamlined daily operations

  • January 23, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

I use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management primarily for incident management, setting up priorities based on business impact, tracking SLA compliance, and coordinating with application, database, and infrastructure teams. This includes all investigations, updates, logs, and resolution details recommended in the ticket for audit and traceability.

Additionally, I use BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for change requests, such as production deployments and configuration changes, which includes raising tickets with attached implementation and rollback plans, obtaining approvals, and tracking post-implementation reviews to ensure changes are implemented successfully without impacting business operations.

How has it helped my organization?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has impacted our organization positively in multiple areas. From an efficiency perspective, automated ticket routing, SLA tracking, and standardized workflows have reduced manual effort and improved response and resolution times, especially for high-priority incidents. This has helped teams focus more on issue resolution rather than coordination and follow-ups.

Regarding compliance and governance, the centralized system, approval workflows, and detailed audit trail ensure that all incidents, changes, and requests are properly documented. After using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, we have observed a noticeable reduction in incident resolution time, especially for high-priority tickets, mainly due to automated ticket routing, better prioritization, and faster coordination between teams. On average, MTTR has improved by around 20% to 30% for recurring or well-known issues.

There is also a visible reduction in manual errors, such as incorrect ticket categorization or missed SLAs, because of predefined workflow templates and SLA alerts. This has helped improve overall ticket quality and consistency. From a compliance and audit perspective, the complete audit trail and standardized change processes have resulted in smoother audits with fewer observations related to documentation gaps or approval tracking. Overall, these measurable improvements have positively impacted operational efficiency, stability, and service quality.

What is most valuable?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management helps significantly coordinate between application, database, and infrastructure teams by providing a single, centralized platform for communication and tracking. During an incident, all teams are working on the same ticket, which helps avoid duplicate efforts and miscommunications. I can assign the tickets to the appropriate support group, and key details will be in work notes, attached logs, and screenshots. I can tag the relevant team, set SLA timing, and establish escalation rules to ensure the right team is engaged on time, especially for a critical issue. Since updates are visible to all stakeholders in real-time, communication becomes smoother and more transparent.

In addition to incident and change management, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management streamlines my daily tasks by providing clear workflows, visibility, and accountability. Features including automated notifications, SLA tracking, and predefined templates reduce the manual workflow and ensure nothing is missed. The dashboard and reporting capabilities also help in tracking recurring issues, workload, and overall team performance, which improves planning and coordination across teams.

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management offers powerful features for automating repetitive tasks such as ticket classification, routing, and incident prediction using AI and machine learning, which reduces manual work and speeds up resolution. The AI-driven features in BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management have noticeably improved my workflow in several key ways. For example, AI-assisted ticket classification and routing help ensure incidents and service requests are categorized and assigned to the right team more quickly and accurately than manual triage. This has reduced the turnaround time for critical tickets and cut down on manual efforts needed to correct misrouted issues.

Additionally, the AI suggestions during ticket updates, such as recommended solutions based on similar past incidents, have helped accelerate troubleshooting instead of digging through past logs manually. I can review suggested resolutions and apply the one that is most relevant, so issues get resolved faster and more consistently. One feature that I find particularly helpful and sometimes underrated is the integrated audit trail and visibility that BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management provides. Having all actions, updates, approvals, and handoffs captured in a single timeline makes it much easier to track ownership, review past incidents, and support audits or post-incident analysis. This is especially valuable in a production environment where traceability and compliance are important.

Another useful aspect is the flexibility of workflows and templates, which allows teams to standardize processes while still adapting them to specific operational needs. This consistency helps reduce errors and improve collaboration across teams. Overall, these features may not always stand out immediately, but they add significant value in day-to-day operations.

What needs improvement?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is powerful, but there are areas where I think it could be improved, such as user interface simplification, faster AI learning, and context awareness. While the platform is robust, some users find parts of the interface complex or cluttered, especially for occasional users or business teams outside of IT. A more intuitive, modern UI with simplified navigation could improve adoption.

The AI features are valuable, but in some cases, they can be inconsistent in suggesting the most relevant knowledge articles or resolutions, especially for rare or highly specific incidents. Enhancing context sensitivity and learning speed could increase accuracy. The mobile experience requires enhancement; while the mobile app and mobile interface are usable, performance and responsiveness could be better, particularly when working with large attachments or complex forms on a phone or tablet.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for four years and one month.

What other advice do I have?

For those considering BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, I would offer the following advice: Understand and map your processes first. Mapping out your incident, change, and requirement workflows before implementation ensures the platform is configured efficiently and matches your organization's needs. Leverage AI and automation by taking full advantage of the AI-driven ticket routing, predictive insights, and automated workflows to reduce manual effort and improve resolution time.

Invest in training and adoption to ensure teams, including non-IT departments, are trained on the platform to maximize adoption and consistent usage. Start small and scale gradually, beginning with critical IT processes first and then expanding to other business units like HR or facilities, helping in a smooth deployment and avoiding overwhelming users. Finally, monitor and optimize continuously by using the dashboards and reporting to track SLAs, compliance, recurring issues, and team performance, refining workflows regularly for better efficiency.

Overall, I find BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management to be a powerful and comprehensive platform that has significantly improved incident resolution, team coordination, and service delivery in our organization. While there are areas that could be further improved, such as simplifying the user interface, enhancing mobile performance, and making AI suggestions more context-aware, the platform's automation, dashboards, and cross-team visibility make it a valuable tool for both IT and non-IT teams. I would recommend it to organizations looking for a scalable, flexible, and efficient enterprise service management solution. I would rate this product a 9 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Hybrid Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


    Ravi ShankarSundarasan

Integrated multi‑cloud discovery has improved incident control and change workflows

  • January 20, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

For the past three years, I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management in my current organization, Blue Yonder, where I utilize BMC Discovery management solution for discovering the multi-cloud workloads deployed for Blue Yonder, and in HSBC, I have used BMC Helix IT Service Management along with BMC agents for monitoring servers spread across 60+ countries for HSBC Global IT infrastructure.

My main use case for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management in my current organization involves discovering the cloud workloads deployed in Microsoft Azure, VMware on-premise private cloud, GCP cloud, and OCI cloud, for listing resources provisioned in the cloud as well as in the on-premise environment, where I use ServiceNow as my IT CMDB, and BMC Discovery performs the discovery and scanning, sending the data to my ServiceNow CMDB.

The integration of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management with ServiceNow is seamless; I am able to discover all the cloud-native products, and the experience is fantastic with a seamless integration.

What is most valuable?

The best features BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management offers include scalability, robust ITIL service management, and excellent discovery for the multi-cloud infrastructure, particularly excelling in change problem management.

In terms of features, particularly around change management, the product works very well, allowing me to create multiple kinds of changes such as normal change, expedited change, emergency change, and I can track the changes by logging into the respective portals.

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has a positive impact on my organization by greatly improving workforce productivity; it creates dashboards for different personas within the organization, including the IT service management leadership team and the infrastructure operations engineering team, which is very useful for the day-to-day ITSM process.

Specific metrics showing productivity improvement include our ability to reduce the number of incidents; since cloud workloads are always dynamic, BMC Discovery discovers the products every 24 hours, allowing me to get newly provisioned resources in any cloud platform used in Blue Yonder, which truly helps the infrastructure operations and engineering teams to easily track incidents and the recently provisioned resources.

What needs improvement?

Regarding my main use case or how BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management works with cloud environments, I believe it needs more interoperability and integration with data platforms such as Salesforce, Snowflake, and Databricks, which requires improvement.

To improve BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, the integration with data cloud platforms such as Salesforce, Snowflake, Databricks, and Redis Cache needs to be enhanced as these modern data cloud platforms require more attention from BMC.

In terms of needed improvements, particularly regarding user experience, I believe more integration options are necessary within data cloud platforms, and the implementation timelines should be reduced.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been working for over 19 years in IT infrastructure management and cloud infrastructure management.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is very stable based on my experience.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is impressive; we run close to 22,000 workloads in Microsoft Azure and 10,000+ virtual machines in the VMware on-premise environment, making the product very scalable for multi-cloud platforms, on-premise virtual infrastructure, and physical infrastructure, with support for legacy mainframe systems and IBM AIX systems as well.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is excellent.

I would rate the customer support a perfect 10.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

We have not used any different solution before BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management.

How was the initial setup?

The setup cost and licensing experience are straightforward, with minimal challenges encountered.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment with BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management by reducing the MTTR by up to 30%, and while I cannot comment on money saved, the solution reduces the number of support staff required to manage a larger infrastructure for a SaaS organization such as Blue Yonder.

What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?

My experience with pricing, setup costs, and licensing for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management indicates that the pricing is high compared to competitors available in the market, such as ServiceNow or Jira.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

Before choosing BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, I evaluated other options such as ServiceNow and Jira Service Management from Atlassian.

What other advice do I have?

My advice for global enterprise organizations considering an IT service management product is to evaluate BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management product features and capabilities regarding AIOps, self-healing, AI and machine learning functionalities, and interoperability with existing tools and monitoring solutions; it is definitely worth the time spent in evaluating the product for enterprise needs.

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is truly an enterprise-class product that assists global enterprises in day-to-day incident, change, and problem management, improving workforce productivity while being scalable and resilient, supporting all multi-cloud infrastructure platforms. I would rate this product 9 out of 10.


    reviewer2797722

Proactive monitoring has reduced downtime and now predicts issues before they impact services

  • January 17, 2026
  • Review provided by PeerSpot

What is our primary use case?

My main use case for BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is related to the environment; once I provide feedback, it's helpful if your environment needs this service to serve it. BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management portal is divided into multiple services, including Discovery, workflow, ITSM, BHOM, dashboard, and service monitoring, all powered by AI. I have worked on all of these features, which has helped me. We use ITSM in our company to solve the ticketing system for support tickets, and there are workflows opened from divisions like financial and sales that are very helpful. The Discovery tool helps discover all your assets in your company, making it necessary for collaboration between your servers and services.

Out of all those services, I mainly interact with the BHOM part day-to-day, where I work on the events that trigger the services and servers based on the threshold monitored by the monitor policy and the alarm policy. I also follow up with service monitoring. If there is any event opened or an incident occurred, it gets flagged based on these policies. The AI features help predict future issues with the server or service, such as potential thresholds being reached after a few hours. Therefore, I am mainly dedicated to BHOM.

One unique aspect of my workflow with BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is that the dashboard reflects results from the BHOM, as well as from Discovery and service monitoring. Before using BHOM, it's important to have a good Discovery to know all your assets, as this assists in monitoring your services effectively.

What is most valuable?

The best features of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management depend on what your environment needs, as different companies might only require the dashboard or just Discovery without BHOM, ITSM, or workflow.

Personally, the most valuable features for my environment include BHOM, service monitoring, and the dashboard. The Discovery tool is necessary but works best in tandem with BHOM and service monitoring to establish reliable monitoring and insights into my environment.

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management has positively impacted my organization by sending event alerts. For instance, if I monitor a server with disk thresholds, an email alert notifies the end user when storage is reaching its maximum capacity, which is extremely helpful.

By receiving alerts and emails ahead of time, I have noticed reductions in downtime. For example, monitoring a Hyper-V environment allows me to keep an eye on the Cluster Shared Volume (CSV). When the CSV nears capacity, I can take action before an outage occurs, which has been crucial for system stability.

What needs improvement?

BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management could use improvements on the dashboard; having a ready-to-use dashboard that just needs asset information instead of building one from scratch would be helpful. The lack of templates for dashboards and limited email notification customization are also areas needing attention.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management for one year.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

In my experience, BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

The scalability of BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management is good, as it grows with our organization's needs.

How are customer service and support?

I have had positive experiences with customer support, having worked with both third-party teams and the BMC support team, including escalating cases to the R&D team which have been resolved successfully.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

I did not use any solution before BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, but I worked with a company that used ManageEngine, which is also good. I am familiar with other tools such as SolarWinds and Zabbix, but my primary experience is with ManageEngine.

What was our ROI?

I have seen a return on investment, especially in terms of time saved. For instance, developing metrics to monitor disk capacity prevents potential disasters.

What other advice do I have?

I do not have any advice for others looking into using BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management, as I have provided all the information I have. I do not have any additional thoughts about BMC Helix Enterprise Service Management before we wrap up. I rate this product an 8 out of 10.


    Computer Software

Tool with automated platform and minimal cost

  • December 21, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
Inventory Management and Device Management
What do you dislike about the product?
Nothing for now, may be come back later if don't like something
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Nothing


    Restaurants

BMC Client Management is a robust tool for managing your systems

  • February 04, 2020
  • Review provided by G2

What do you like best about the product?
I love how many different things you can do with this software, I'm sure we haven't even scratched the surface even after years of use.
What do you dislike about the product?
It took quite some time to get it to run stable
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use it primarily for centralized Windows/software updates for our in house systems and field systems, as well as pushing out GPO style settings to our many non-domain joined machines.


showing 1 - 7