Sign in Agent Mode
Categories
Your Saved List Become a Channel Partner Sell in AWS Marketplace Amazon Web Services Home Help

AttackIQ

AttackIQ

Reviews from AWS customer

1 AWS reviews
  • 1
  • 4 star
    0
  • 3 star
    0
  • 2 star
    0
  • 1 star
    0

External reviews

2 reviews
from and

External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.


5-star reviews ( Show all reviews )

    reviewer2783439

Continuous offensive testing has transformed our cloud security and prioritizes critical fixes

  • March 07, 2026
  • Review from a verified AWS customer

What is our primary use case?

We use AttackIQ for automated, continuous testing and offensive testing. We use their scaled offensive testing module in AttackIQ, which continuously validates your environment and cloud environment, then identifies exposures that we take and try to fix them.

I'm the security person on the team, so AttackIQ has become really useful for us to automate this continuous testing because before we would only have point-in-time testing. We would only be able to get a scan at a single point in time, but now it's useful because it provides continuous monitoring.

We use public cloud for AttackIQ.

What is most valuable?

The continuous testing and continuous offensive testing are among the best features that AttackIQ offers, and being able to categorize it based on criticality such as very critical, emergency, high, medium, and low is valuable.

AttackIQ allows us to resolve issues much quicker because these issues come in categories, enabling us to prioritize them and fix the emergency issues first.

It has definitely reduced response time and improved our discoverability of these issues in the first place.

What needs improvement?

I can't think of anything right now about how AttackIQ can be improved because I probably need to use it for a little bit more before I can understand what needs to be improved. So far I don't have anything that I could identify.

For how long have I used the solution?

I have been using AttackIQ for four and a half months.

What do I think about the stability of the solution?

AttackIQ is stable.

What do I think about the scalability of the solution?

AttackIQ's scalability has been good and we have had no issues with it so far.

How are customer service and support?

The customer support for AttackIQ is pretty quick and we have no issues.

Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?

This is our first time using a solution like AttackIQ.

How was the initial setup?

My experience with the pricing, setup cost, and licensing for AttackIQ was pretty easy. We didn't have any issues and it was pretty straightforward.

What was our ROI?

It's hard to say about money saved because it has only been four and a half months with AttackIQ, but definitely a lot of time has been saved. I would say approximately 15% of our time.

Which other solutions did I evaluate?

We evaluated Pentera as well before choosing AttackIQ.

What other advice do I have?

I would rate AttackIQ a 10 out of 10 because so far I have no issues with it. AttackIQ is solving a lot of the problems that I had before or that we as an organization had before, even the security team, so it's solving all my issues. I would say definitely make sure you know your use case before you purchase AttackIQ. I give this product a rating of 10 out of 10.

Which deployment model are you using for this solution?

Public Cloud

If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?

Amazon Web Services (AWS)


showing 1 - 1