We are still working with Barracuda Email Protection. The requirement for Barracuda Email Protection is to ensure security over all emails that come into the office, so it protects us from all malicious code, phishing, and ransomware attacks. It saves us from all of them, and it also tells us if there is a vulnerability in any user.

The functions in Barracuda Email Protection that I find the most valuable are the way it is reported and the way the solution is given for a threat if it has found one. The way it has protected malicious mails from being delivered makes a huge impact.

Threat Protection is a feature we use, which only gives us an advanced warning or an alert on any kind of malicious code coming in as an email.

Link Protection for email security is very important and very useful. We do use Link Protection extensively.

We do use Barracuda Data Protection functions, and the advantage we have is that the backed up data is protected from any possible attack that can come or any kind of hijack or data being misused. The Data Protection feature helps us ensure that the data is safe.

Barracuda Email Protection helps us prevent accidental data leaks because it gives Link Protection, so you don't click a link by oversight or mistake thinking it is genuine. This ensures that your chances of being vulnerable are gone, and the data used for protection is also safe, so we don't see any kind of data leak coming through this.

The main benefits Barracuda Email Protection provides for us are saving time and money because we don't run into any kind of attack or disruption in the mail service that we may face, including ransomware attacks. That is definitely important for us; the workflow is there but it is not that critical at this point. However, it is important to be protected and save money.

In my opinion, Barracuda Email Protection can improve by possibly adding more features towards zero trust capabilities or towards ensuring that the data protected is more secure, such as a vault. Additionally, the retrieval feature through Outlook, which is the email client that we use most, can be improved.

For the purpose for which we use it, I see no lack of function in Barracuda Email Protection. The wishlist can always be there to enhance it, but from what it is meant to do, it is fairly up-to-date and modern.

I have been working with Barracuda Email Protection for about six to seven years.

For stability, I would rate Barracuda Email Protection almost a nine.

I would also rate the scalability of Barracuda Email Protection as a nine.

We have not had too many technical issues, but I would rate technical support as an eight. They can still improve.

The setup process for Barracuda Email Protection is quite simple. We did the setup ourselves; our team installed it.

We did compare Barracuda Email Protection with other products, specifically Check Point Harmony. We chose Barracuda Email Protection over Harmony because we found Barracuda Email Protection's strike rate on identifying detection was much higher. Second, we found Barracuda Email Protection's pricing to be far more comparable and reasonable than Harmony. Additionally, I found the speed of Harmony was not as good as Barracuda Email Protection.

I would give Barracuda Email Protection a final mark of about nine. We strongly recommend users to go with Barracuda Email Protection.

Threat protection, spam filtering, and cloud backup solutions are essential for me.

The most helpful aspect for me is the out-of-the-box configuration, which is fairly good. It allows me to build my own custom rules and assists with DMARC, focusing on email security and domain reputation.

Additionally, it has stopped people from frequently asking me about blocked emails, allowing them to release emails from quarantine themselves. This feature saves me time by preventing external threats effectively.

Considering it integrates with Azure, I would like to be able to effectively set up policies where people are by default included in certain settings. For instance, for email quarantine, I can't set up a global setting. Users must go through an induction session where I guide them in configuring quarantine alerts rather than having default settings based on group membership. This seems like an oversight since they already use Active Directory details. They should assign policies based on group membership, which configures these settings by default.

I have used the solution for about five years now.

I haven't had to use customer service much, however, when I have, it has been pretty good. They are responsive, meet their SLAs, and provide answers quickly. I had a problem with our cloud backup where it wasn't restoring a team properly. They went through the process and recommended a change in their platform to address the issue. They also gave me a workaround that worked perfectly, demonstrating their efficiency all the way up to the third line.

It took me a day to set it up. I don't often set up new mail spam filters and relays. Nonetheless, it was fairly painless. I've since set up another domain, which was even easier, indicating there is maturation since the original setup.

Five years ago, I considered this, and Barracuda offered an educational price point with significant discounts for education. It provides good value. They also offer a range of training options, including setting up phishing scams for educational purposes.

I would rate the solution nine out of ten. Nothing can be a ten since nothing's perfect.

Barracuda Email Protection is good for customers who don't have resources to manage email security. It is automated and easy to use. You just need to configure it, turn it on, and it works automatically. It's suitable for customers with up to a thousand users and does not require extensive customization.

The beauty of Barracuda Email Protection is that it is easy to manage and simple to deploy. While there is a lack of flexibility in terms of creating policies, this feature is beneficial for small customers who would prefer not to make multiple changes.

It is also known for providing excellent support, scoring ten out of ten in that aspect. However, Barracuda faces challenges with weak reporting and integration issues, particularly with their security awareness training platform.

Barracuda Email Protection needs better reporting and more robust integration with security awareness training platforms and third-party solutions. The fraud detection capability is not well-developed, with many false positives being reported, and there's no way to tune or modify the system.

Additionally, the solution lacks the ability to create custom rules or policies for VIP users, which is a significant drawback.

I have used the solution for five years.

For support, Barracuda is very good, rating it ten out of ten. It is considered one of the best OEMs in the industry for support.

Barracuda is good for customers who lack the resources to manage email security. It works independently without needing much management.

However, if a customer requires extensive policy customization, Barracuda may not satisfy their needs.

Mimecast and ProPoint are other vendors, with Mimecast offering certain technologies that Barracuda does not.

Their list price is too high, but in India, the selling price is affordable at around $10 per user per year. Despite a list price possibly around $40 per user, their market price allows customers to easily buy the solution.

Whether I would recommend Barracuda Email Protection depends on the customer’s use case and budget. If there is no need for advanced DLP or custom rules and policies based on user groups, Barracuda could be a good solution. Its simplicity and ease of management are attractive, however, it may not be ideal for large teams seeking extensive customization.

I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.

We use the solution to filter inbound emails for spam emails.

We check the reports sometimes to see that frequent attacks and malicious emails are being blocked by the solution.

Two to three months back, we got fraudulent emails in which someone in the organization was being blamed.

According to our requirement, we gradually increase the number of users from 40 to 50 users per year. It is easy to increase the number of users for the solution.

We were satisfied with the technical support because we know the technical things. However, our head still had questions, so he was not satisfied with the support.

I've previously used Office 365, and we got a lot of spam emails with that tool. Since Office 365 used basic security, it was not as secure as Barracuda Email Protection.

The solution’s initial setup was easy.

We didn't have to pay a lot for the solution because we got it from a good vendor with a good user volume. We would have got the product at a high price from some other vendor. We also checked with other vendors, and we got the solution at the cheapest price in our region. Currently, we are paying 8.75 per month per user.

The solution is managed by our third-party vendor. Two to three months back, we got fraudulent emails in which someone in the organization was being blamed. We complained about it to our ISP or third-party provider managing the solution. They might have taken some action, and currently, we are not getting those types of emails.

I would recommend the solution to other users.

Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

The solution is useful for archiving. We archive emails and search our mailboxes.

The archiving and search features are very good. It is easy to integrate Barracuda with tools like Exchange.

The solution must provide security gateway features. It must enable users to archive emails for a specific period. The tool must allow organizations to extend the storage capacity by at least 10%. It must enable the extension of storage to an external drive. We faced problems when the storage became full. We use an on-premise solution, and it reached maximum capacity.

The product must enable bulk user management. It would be helpful if we wanted to get PST files for bulk users. Currently, when we need to get PST files for a group of people, the administrators have to do it individually. It would be good if we could upload it in an Excel sheet. It will be great if we can search for inactive users.

I have been using the solution for six to seven years.

I rate the tool’s stability a nine out of ten.

I rate the tool’s scalability a nine out of ten for the archiving features. It is suitable for medium-sized businesses. My organization has more than 200 employees. My previous organization had 300 to 400 users.

The support team fixes our problems. I have had a positive experience with support.

The price is similar to that of Microsoft 365. There’s only a 4% to 5% difference between the prices of Barracuda and Microsoft 365.

Microsoft 365 provides a lot of features. If Barracuda and Microsoft 365 cost the same, we would choose Microsoft 365.

I will recommend the product to others. Overall, I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

We use Barracuda primarily as an email gateway. It also integrates with the Microsoft 365 platform.

It provides anti-spam protection and all the various anti-spam aspects of email management. We generally use it with products other than Microsoft, so we're very happy to have Barracuda available.

We have a good experience with it. We consider Barracuda very efficient and easier to manage than other products, especially Microsoft products.

I like that I have less work to do analyzing the spam and overall email flow. And when I need to analyze the traffic flow, I can always find answers to any issue.

I'm quite satisfied with the graphical user interface for Barracuda products.

Moreover, it has AI protection. Based on the results I've seen, I'm quite satisfied with the product.

Regarding Barracuda Email Protection specifically, I'm quite satisfied. I think there's room for improvement in their other products, especially their cloud firewall protection and ZTNA offerings.

Moreover, prices could be more granular, especially for the small business area. Typically, in Italy, the majority of our customers are small businesses. It would be better if the prices could be adjusted for small businesses.

I have been working with Barracuda products and have been for some years. We (my company) started with their on-premises solution and are generally trying to move to a cloud version.

I consider it quite stable. Barracuda has efficient support in case of incidents, and we're satisfied. I'd rate it a nine out of ten for stability.

I'd rate it a nine out of ten for scalability. We have some customers, and we are trying to move other customers from on-premises solutions to Barracuda, expecially on Premium version that integrate other strategic features (Cloud Archiving, Cloud to cloud backup for 365, Entra ID cloud backup)

The customer service and support has been improved with the support available directly from European region and on-line chat.

We use Sophos Central Email Advanced with some customer, and so far, we're satisfied.

The setup is quite simple, but it does require a little training, as with all other products. Fortunately, Barracuda offers resources for that.

The deployment takes less than a day. It is very easy.

However, Barracuda integration's capabilities depend on the specific infrastructure. If you have Microsoft protection, the integration is quite good. We haven't had any problems when customization was needed.

Initially we had vendor support for startup configuration; documentation is huge

Barracuda licensing model is good. The price could always be better.

I would recommend Barracuda Email Protection, especially compared to Microsoft products.

Overall, I would rate it a nine out of ten.

We use Barracuda Email Protection for user management purposes.

Barracuda helps our organization prevent data breaches more efficiently than Microsoft with a simpler interface. It provides an easy process for administrators like myself to manage and configure settings.

The product’s most valuable feature is email notification.

The platform's pricing needs improvement.

It is a stable platform.

We have around 200 Barracuda Email Protection users in our organization.

The technical support services have been satisfactory.

We used Microsoft. We switched to Barracuda Email Protection for ease of use.

The product is easy to deploy and maintain.

The product is expensive. We purchase its annual license.

Barracuda Email Protection’s fraud detection capabilities prove beneficial in classifying spam into different terminologies. It is easy to integrate with IT infrastructure and different software such as Microsoft Exchange.

I recommend it to others and rate it an eight out of ten.