I am an RPA developer and tech lead within the RPA field. I have used UiPath Platform according to RPA development, especially for many customers, and I have worked within companies that also recommended UiPath Platform as a solution to their needs and business processes. There were many different use cases. The most popular one is traditional RPA automation of repetitive tasks, such as downloading reports and automating business processes where we created robots performing certain tasks in the customer's core systems.

I have also participated in a couple of use cases using AI Center from UiPath Platform and Document Understanding and data, but mainly, the most popular one is just the typical RPA traditional approach.

I did not have a chance to try agentic automation on a real use case; I just started it by myself to get familiar with the technology, not diving deep into that, but I appreciate the idea of Maestro and how it looks. I really appreciate the approach of showing just a simple BPMN or diagram where you are solving your puzzle and collecting all the components in one place. It reminds me of my first RPA tool, Blue Prism, which I also really appreciated. I never faced any issues because I did not use it for a real use case, but it looks promising, especially how easily you can automate and create agents and context-based agents with RAG. I appreciate it and I am hoping that there will be opportunities in the nearest future where I can use something from Maestro or agentic automation or all together, which would be interesting.

The best feature of UiPath Platform that I appreciate the most is UiPath Studio. It is a great tool that I appreciate because I am a developer and I also have a background as a .NET developer, and I really appreciate how Studio is built on the WWF framework, Windows Workflow Foundation. It also includes the core .NET libraries, which are really good, and it appears as a native integration environment, such as Visual Studio or other products.

The Orchestrator is also really good because it is a great tool with the open API, which I leverage really often. Those are the most beloved ones from UiPath Platform.

By using UiPath Platform, I always try to reduce human errors by the maximum amount possible. It really depends on the projects because we have a rapidly changing environment when needing to do something quick as a POC or MVP product to show the customer something that works. In my experience where I developed solutions using UiPath Platform, I always aim for an eighty percent reduction in human errors.

I see Blue Prism as a tool that is more compatible with customers and structures that keep a high focus on security. It is a popular choice for banks and financial structures because it is simple and has enhanced security features which are really appreciated by banks, financial structures, and also the government. Power Automate is also a great tool, particularly with its connections to the Power Platform, such as Power Apps, providing a seamless integration experience. I would say that Power Automate is more suitable when you have the full Microsoft stack, when you need to automate something inside regularly using SharePoint, Excel online, and Outlook.

UiPath Platform combines all these elements, as it caters to both citizen developers and experienced developers. If you know some programming language, you can do really agile things with UiPath Platform. Furthermore, UiPath Platform offers enhanced security features specifically for healthcare and banking. UiPath Platform is the right choice when you start your automation journey because it can do everything. You can create something focused on security or integrate with the Microsoft stack, though not as seamlessly as Power Automate. From the developer experience perspective, UiPath Platform is the winner, as it feels developed even with low-code, but still provides a feeling of native development, such as back-end development where you can freely utilize your favorite programming language, .NET and C#.

Backward compatibility has room for improvement because it often happens that when someone starts developing on one version of UiPath Platform, for example, version 2023.4, and newer versions come out, they might not have a proper SDLC which covers keeping up-to-date on UiPath Platform. When deciding to update to the newest version, it is often the case that it breaks previously developed automations and code. Even ninety percent of your code might not work due to new activities, packages, or something else. The first improvement should be on backward compatibility, which means I want to easily update when I need to.

I have also faced an issue with Q items and API. It does not allow full manipulation of Q items as you can do natively. For instance, there are several stages of transaction status, and with the API, you can grab and read details about items but cannot set the status in progress, which is essential for UiPath Platform to advance to the next transaction stages. This is covered by native activities of UiPath Platform, but when I want to leverage it from the API, I cannot do so.

The second point is the lack of proper documentation for coded automation workflows. I noticed that not many people use the coded workflows feature, which is great for creating C# classes for helpers and other custom needs. However, the lack of documentation and answers in the UiPath Platform forum can be frustrating. I would suggest more rich documentation and an open-source behavior approach for this feature to provide information for developers.

I have focused on UiPath Platform for probably three and a half years, maybe four.

Stability depends on the operator and infrastructure robustness. I would say it is generally good, but sometimes the bugs or behavior of the studio itself are frustrating. Therefore, I would rate it a seven due to these bugs and backward compatibility issues, as they tend to stop maintaining previous packages and versions, which can become buggy.

I would rate the technical support a strong nine. It is really good.

I have never used UiPath Platform for my personal projects, but for my clients, I would say it typically saves three to seven FDEs per week, which is really great.

Regarding pricing, I do not have direct access to it because it is always up to customers as the sales team from the customer side handles the purchases. However, from what I have heard and seen, it is probably more expensive than other vendors, but there are no doubts that it is worth it.

When comparing UiPath Platform with other RPA tools such as Blue Prism, I would say UiPath Platform is always the right option because Blue Prism and Power Automate and Power Platform are really for specific use cases. I also have experience with Power Automate and Power Platform.

I have really good feedback about UiPath Platform Academy courses because they provide plenty of information, divided into sections and include gamification with the robot icon watching. However, I do have one main concern regarding the tasks that you need to perform to gain your knowledge perfectly. They are pretty easy for me, especially. I would add some difficulty to that. Overall, the structure and the information located there are good and they cover all of my needs to check, review, or learn something.

I think the UiPath Platform user community lacks information about some complex use cases, which is a problem for the forum, as it seems that everyone develops something simple and only asks straightforward questions, getting their answers on the forum. However, when it becomes serious, you really struggle on the forum to find information. I do use the forum to get answers from the LLM models, but I would say it needs improvement, such as publishing more serious cases to provide answers to more specific questions.

My advice for someone looking into purchasing an RPA tool such as UiPath Platform is to always search for really qualified engineers, not just citizen developers. When building something complex and wanting to get your ROI, hiring qualified developers is essential. It is a must. Based on this, I would recommend UiPath Platform.

I would say that if you do not consider maintenance at the start, it will be complex and difficult. However, if you think about it from scratch, it can be easy. I perform maintenance with the major releases of the platform about once every three months. My overall rating for UiPath Platform is an eight.

I have used UiPath Platform for process mining to find automation opportunities, specifically for the P2P, Process to Pay process. We found the insight we wanted. In my team, UiPath Platform used to be utilized by three or four people; however, I'm not certain how many people can use it.

The best features of UiPath Platform are that it is quite user-friendly and easy to understand.

The user interface of UiPath Platform is easy to use; you can understand what you need to do, and the navigation is good and easy to find.

In our organization, UiPath Platform improved the P2P process, where there were some manual steps such as the approval process that was done manually. We suggested making it automated; it helped maintain the hierarchy to get approval and was quite fast. After that, we saved a lot of time with increased accuracy, which was beneficial.

In UiPath Platform, the area that may have room for improvement is the language, which is quite difficult. From the SQL perspective, it feels more manageable to handle or write, but the language needed to create some KPIs in UiPath Platform is quite challenging.

I have compared UiPath Platform with other automation tools such as Power Automate and Celonis, and while they were quite similar, I still have concerns about the programming language only.

I have used UiPath Platform for one year.

I would rate the stability of UiPath Platform as nine.

UiPath Platform is scalable, and I would rate it an eight for its ease to upscale or downscale the solution.

I would rate the technical support for UiPath Platform as nine.

I have used the academy courses to learn about UiPath Platform.

I am satisfied with the academy courses for UiPath Platform; they are good and easy to understand. One suggestion is if they could put more videos on more use cases; that would be great.

It took maybe a few days to set up UiPath Platform; I don't remember exactly, but it took some days.

I cannot provide an exact number, but UiPath Platform reduced human error quite significantly. I cannot give exact numbers, but we did implement some automation using that platform, which enabled us to find some automation opportunities that we implemented. The reduction may be around 10-20%.

UiPath Platform has saved us approximately 50.

I think the pricing for UiPath Platform is cost-efficient.

I haven't tried using communications mining in UiPath Platform, and I haven't explored that area, so I cannot comment on it.

I would recommend UiPath Platform to other users; however, I would mention that the programming language can be quite difficult. If someone is good with programming languages and has a good understanding, then it's fine; it's good. I would rate this review an eight overall.

Our use case is business process automation where we use UiPath Platform to automate different manual processes that are being done today at different business units in the company end to end.

The first best feature in UiPath Platform would be the Elastic Robot Orchestration, ERO, that helps to scale up or scale down robot devices automatically for cost optimization. The second would be the overall tenant concept in the orchestrator that isolates data and view based on function, ensuring security. The third would be its excellent integration capabilities with multiple applications, allowing for easy data pulling in our automation.

We have generally integrated it with most Microsoft-based applications such as MS Dynamics, SharePoint, Teams, and Outlook, as well as some non-Microsoft applications such as S/4HANA, SAP, and Salesforce.

For email automation, we are using the Communication Mining feature in UiPath Platform, allowing us to train the email documents to assess tone and content with about 90% accuracy.

In terms of UiPath Platform itself, I think improvements could be made to the UI arrangement to make it more user-friendly and simpler. The operational support is generally good, but often starts from scratch when we reach out with problems, resulting in wasted time. Finally, the cost and complexity of licenses could be simplified as some similar vendors provide features at a lower cost.

We have been using UiPath Platform since 2021.

I would rate the stability of UiPath Platform a nine, stating that downtime, bugs, or glitches are very rare.

The system is scalable. I would rate the scalability a perfect 10.

The UiPath Platform user community has been excellent, being very responsive, and we often seek help there to find solutions. The community team also organizes events regularly.

I would rate the technical support an eight.

We also use UiPath Platform besides Automation Anywhere.

If I compare UiPath Platform with Automation Anywhere, UiPath Platform's core RPA product is much more mature, with enterprise-grade features that Automation Anywhere still lacks. However, Automation Anywhere offers a simpler and faster go-to-market approach for automation development.

We are using the regular RPA platform instead of the Agentic Automation.

For email automation, we are using the Communication Mining feature in UiPath Platform, allowing us to train the email documents to assess tone and content with about 90% accuracy.

UiPath Academy is a one-stop solution that serves as a proper training platform, which we have integrated with our in-house training platform to keep our developers and solution architects up to date with new features and capabilities.

It depends on the use cases; we perform a cost-benefit analysis for every new use case, determining whether it is related to headcount saving, regulatory and compliance saving, or faster processing. In general, we keep a threshold of 100k US dollars in terms of direct FTE savings for each automation use case.

In terms of processing speed, we see a reduction of at least 50% to 60% after automation, which translates to significant time or effort savings per use case.

I would rate UiPath Platform an eight in terms of cost efficiency, with one being cheap and ten being expensive.

UiPath Platform works when reviewing the solution.

Since it is a SaaS platform, there is no maintenance required on our part, as everything is managed by the vendor.

I would definitely recommend this product to other enterprises as it is an enterprise-grade level RPA software, although it might not suit organizations operating at a lower scale or margin due to cost.

Overall, more than 1,000 users utilize the solution. I would rate this review a nine.

My main use case for UiPath Platform is invoice processing. An agent helps identify relevant inbound emails/attachments (invoices), then a robot validates and posts invoices into two or more Saas or app (i e:ERP platforms). Document Understanding/IDP extracts key fields (vendor, invoice number/date, totals, tax, line items) before human validation and final posting to finance.

UiPath helps by providing an enterprise-grade framework for governance and auditability in regulated contexts. It reduces the effort of rebuilding controls for each automation, supports standardized delivery, and improves reliability and consistency when handling client-facing processes.

UiPath is a leading platform for enterprise automation. For my use cases, the main improvement area is agentic/LLM-based automation maturity in production; especially consistency, controllability, and reducing the iteration required to reach stable results. Continued enhancements to guardrails and human-in-the-loop workflows would further strengthen large-scale deployments.

I have been using UiPath Platform for seven years.

UiPath Platform is the best in terms of stability.

Regarding UiPath Platform's scalability, I have never tried scalability with a hundred or thousand robots, but they say it is easily scalable. I have never had those clients where I could put a hundred to a thousand robots, but they say it is scalable easily. I trust them.

The customer support for UiPath Platform is good.

Before choosing UiPath Platform, I evaluated options such as Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere.

I have seen a return on investment of around a huge return in three to six months, which is a short time regarding the usual SaaS products from two to three years ago or 18 months prior. Now with UiPath Platform, you can deliver a return on investment in three to six months. It depends on the complexity of the workflows.

Overall, the experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been acceptable. The key is to size the licenses to the automation strategy and expected utilization to ensure predictable ROI.

I evaluated Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere, but selected UiPath for its overall ecosystem and delivery speed for enterprise automation—particularly around development experience, orchestration, and document processing for end-to-end workflows.

I would rate UiPath Platform 9/10. Start with a high-volume, well-defined process (e.g., invoices), define ROI metrics upfront (cycle time, volume, error rate, cost of errors, build/maintenance), and scale gradually with clear governance and reusable components.

My use case involves developing robots because I worked as a consultant before and worked with multiple domains like banking, insurance, and healthcare, where I automated monotonous processes. This is my use case where we build a robot, and that is what is mainly used for this tool.

What I appreciate about UiPath Platform is that it is very user-friendly and continuously updates the product according to market trends, which I prefer compared to other competitive tools.

UiPath Platform has reduced human error and freed up time in many cases where we have removed the entire department, and in many cases we have freed half of their work. As a consultant, I can explain this in technical or non-technical terms. We do not talk about the hours we saved; we talk about the FTEs, which means the full-time employment we saved. I think we save approximately five or six FTEs in a year.

An area where UiPath Platform has room for improvement is that they do not have a local source code saving opportunity where we need to save it in our local file or a local PC. They do not have that capability compared to Blue Prism, which directly saves the source code in a database. In UiPath, they don't have that opportunity. Even if I lose my laptop and develop personally, if I lose my laptop, then the entire source code is gone. The tool should not be device-dependent; it should be a cloud-dependent tool.

I have been using UiPath Platform since 2017.

My thoughts on the stability of UiPath Platform are that sometimes we have an issue where they do an update from their side that impacts our robots, especially on a weekend, which is a disaster. I would give it a 4.5 out of 10.

I would rate the scalability of UiPath Platform as highly scalable because they have already integrated a lot of AI features inside the tool, which is truly appreciable. On a scale of 1 to 10, I would say 9.

I would rate their technical support as an 8 out of 10.

I would recommend UiPath Platform to other users, and the first important advice I would give is to check out UiPath Academy, which is very good. Also, the community edition, which is available online from UiPath, allows us to use the tool and learn on one single platform. That is only provided by UiPath. I recommend UiPath Platform because it is user-friendly and cost-effective, and we can get our ROI within six months.

I have not started using the agentic automation in UiPath Platform because I took a course last year at a conference, and I think we have not got any use case for that. I am in dialogue with my management on how we use that going forward because it is still emerging, so we have not got any use case for that.

My thoughts on UiPath Academy courses are that the first thing is they are free, and the second thing is they have a lot of useful insights where it gives the complete product overview and what is included. The missing part is that as a course, we need proper understanding of English or proper communication skills, which is boring when compared to all the other courses available online.

When I compare UiPath Platform with other products, I see that everything is perfect with UiPath Platform in terms of pricing, user-friendliness, capability, and efficiency. I would give it a 9 out of 10, while for other products, I would give 7 or 6 because there are a lot of other flaws in those tools. The only problem I have is that it is device-dependent, and that is the reason I have taken one point down from UiPath Platform.

On a scale of 1 to 10 for pricing, I rate UiPath Platform between 6 to 7. UiPath made a complex design on the licensing part. Each license has different pricing, such as a developer license, production license, or tester license. They made it not very simple. If you compare with other tools, they made it very simple. You buy a production license and get a developer license along with that for free. I think that looks very simple.

The hands-on users of UiPath Platform in my organization would be around 15 to 20. It is a public sector in the whole of Denmark. If I include that, we have around 300 or more developers in the complete Denmark public sector, and in my department, we are around 10. For usage, we have around 300 or more robots.

I do not think the solution requires maintenance; it is not a complex one. UiPath made it very simple, and I appreciate that.

My take on the AI aspect of UiPath Platform is that it is the next future. I think it is also an emerging area where people think AI can do everything, but it is not true; it still needs to be checked. The robots are the main important thing for sourcing the data to the AI. Both are very important. AI is the future, but not so early.

I would rate this review an 8 out of 10 overall.

My use case is automating all manual processes that our clients face difficulty working on, such as data extraction and automation of all data entries. I automate all kinds of manual efforts for the clients.

From my experience, UiPath Platform has reduced human error by removing manual work, and it has reduced almost 70 to 80% of manual efforts. One of our clients who works for Tally used to spend the entire day completing ledger solutions, but after automating that, it was completed within one to two hours, saving almost 70 to 80% of the person's time.

I use agentic automation to help with challenges, and I also use agentic AI in UiPath Platform. In my opinion, it is a good thing because when we use agentic AI, the AI-powered agent observes, decides, plans, and acts automatically to complete tasks instead of following fixed-based rules for the workflows. I appreciate the agentic AI workflows.

With agentic automation, it helps to leverage people, robots, and AI agents to automate processes by having Document Understanding integrated with LLMs, such as Action Centers. I value the LLM parts for that.

The best feature in UiPath Platform, according to me, is the intelligent automation platform that combines modern RPA, AI, Orchestrator, and a strong governance ecosystem in one. We are using modern UI activated, unified targets, and it acts as a single-click activity type, where Orchestrator serves as the central control of all the robots, scheduling, and monitoring, while also having assets for securing our credentials. Additionally, it includes VPN work, a built-in retry mechanism, structured explanation management, easy scaling of queues, Document Understanding for invoice handling and PDFs, ML-based extractions, agentic AI, and autopilots for natural language automations and fewer rule dependencies. That is why I feel UiPath Platform is the best.

The improvements I have noticed in UiPath Platform over the last three years are significant. When we started using UiPath Platform, it was on the classic mode, and now it integrates with modern solutions, offering a UI and AI-native development experience with features such as AI Builder, screenplay, APIs, workflows, and UX enhancements. They are working on fresh designs, updating panel docking, and navigating through logical and sequence views. I see stronger automation on cloud capabilities with automatic cloud continuous updates, focusing on indexing, contacting, and AI automation. The new addition of agentic AI is also invaluable for agenting apps and agentic extractions. While Orchestrator and other features were already present, they are now significantly upgraded, including cloud testing and agentic testing, which reflect the changes over time within three years.

In terms of areas for improvement, UiPath Platform needs to address the high licensing costs in India, making it difficult for small teams to estimate and manage the expenses. Additionally, there is room for better performance in UI automation as it sometimes feels slow for heavy web applications. Upgrading browsers often breaks selectors, so UI performance and the browser dependency can be optimized further. We should reduce reliance on fragile UI clicks for UI automation. I believe we need a stronger API-first integration approach and increased native connectors as many tools such as Studio, Data Understanding, AI Center, and Orchestrator can overwhelm new users. We can provide learning paths inside Studio for smart automation templates and improve the stability of desktop automation for legacy and Citrix automation. Improvements in OCR accuracy and image recognition speed are also necessary. Furthermore, we can enhance transparency in agentic AI decision-making to avoid "black box" scenarios and boost confidence in scoring visibility. While UiPath Platform has no major weaknesses, areas for simplicity and transparency remain to be improved.

I have been using the solution for the last 2.9 years.

Regarding stability, I rate it at 10. UiPath Platform is very stable without significant issues.

It is scalable for my business, but I provide a rating of nine for the scalability aspect.

The user community is a better place for addressing issues where we can post our queries, and the community is always helpful in providing solutions. That is a good aspect.

I have used UiPath Platform, Power Automate, Blue Prism, and a little of Automation Anywhere. In my opinion, for any mid-scale to large enterprise solution, UiPath Platform is the best among these options and remains at the top of the competition. However, I feel that Power Automate has a good advantage for cloud-to-desktop and desktop-to-cloud automation.

The deployment process itself is easy and not too complicated. For someone who has used UiPath Platform before, it is straightforward. However, for beginners, it can seem quite challenging at first, but eventually, it becomes manageable after a few deployments.

There are mainly 10 to 12 persons using UiPath Platform.

Regarding the Academy courses, I gain a lot of new knowledge from Academy automation. I am updated with all the latest information, gaining insights into how to utilize UiPath Platform effectively, which provides additional learning resources for us. Academy is a great asset as it allows users to stay well-informed about new updates without stress.

I would recommend UiPath Platform to other users because it is proficient in AI, Document Understanding, and a range of other functions, making it a valuable tool. However, I also recognize that many clients in India face budget constraints regarding such expensive solutions, indicating that UiPath Platform needs to consider pricing for wider adoption. I have provided an overall review rating of 8 for UiPath Platform.

Today I faced an issue installing the unattended robot in the production machine. I signed in with the robot account and entered the client ID and secret. The system did not recognize the license and was not giving me a proper response. I did not understand what the actual issue was and searched for the community guidelines as well. I had no issues when configuring a business user, an automation developer, or any other users, but I felt discomfort when onboarding a robot account into UiPath Platform Orchestration and connecting that with the production machine.

I am not using Agentic automation in any of my production environments, but I am using it for development purposes. I am exploring the platform on the Agentic side. I was working on a use case where I wanted to extract meaningful data from a chunk of error messages. I used Maestro for that and it was working very well, so the user can easily correlate with the actual issue.

The Agentic response when using some ML activities or AI activities is getting generated with Maestro. Those are up to the standard. I used Maestro to extract meaningful data from error messages and it worked very well.

The developer-friendly environment and the resolution to the problems faced inside UiPath Platform are very fast, and the customer support service as well as the development-friendly environment make deployment and development processes easier.

One thing which I can suggest is to integrate the CI/CD pipeline within UiPath Platform Orchestration. That will be the next step to get into a full Agentic service within UiPath Platform. I am currently using some external CI/CD pipelines, like Azure or others, and integrating them inside UiPath Platform would be an easy-to-go solution for anyone.

The sales approach is a bit slow. It almost took a month to complete the entire sales process and just get the final quote from UiPath Platform US sales team. There was also some discomfort in selecting the packages. The AI unit bundle flexibility in pricing is missing. I wanted to buy a smaller portion of AI units but needed to purchase a large bundle.

Recently, I faced an outage issue with Cloudflare, resulting in being unable to connect UiPath Platform with UiPath Platform Orchestration, and some of the UiPath Platform Orchestration services were down. This was the first time I faced a stability issue.

I expected faster support during a production deployment issue. I got email communication, but a call would have been faster, resolving the issue more quickly.

In the past six years, I never faced an issue, but in the last couple of months, I faced a Cloudflare outage issue where I was not able to connect UiPath Platform with UiPath Platform Orchestration.

In the last couple of months, I faced a Cloudflare outage issue leading to problems connecting UiPath Platform with UiPath Platform Orchestration, along with some services being down. This was my first encounter with a stability issue after six years of experience without any outages.

Scalability is not an issue. Configuring the machines is straightforward with the use of machine templates. After the first configuration, scaling the same process to multiple machines just involves assigning users and adding the machines to the templates, making it an easy process.

I used to connect with technical support. Recently, I faced an issue in configuring the templates and assigning the user from the UiPath Platform Orchestrator tenant. I contacted the technical support team, and they assisted me in resolving that issue quickly through email.

The reason for rating eight is that the email support was good but slower than expected when I had a production deployment issue. I expected quicker response times, preferably through calls, which could resolve issues faster.

I used AssistEdge, an RPA tool from Infosys, and Power Automate, which is from Microsoft.

The initial setup, including the machine setup, takes at least a day, but if the machine is already set up, it is just a one to two-hour task.

Only one person will do the deployment.

Pricing is a bit costlier compared to Power Automate, but the same as AssistEdge. It delivers as expected, so the charge is acceptable.

For some cases, I prefer Microsoft Power Automate because of its cloud-integrated connections, such as creating a flow triggered by a Microsoft email, which is not as straightforward in UiPath Platform. Integration services could be improved within UiPath Platform.

Deployment is a straightforward task, but ensuring integration of the CI/CD pipeline within UiPath Platform Orchestration would enhance the ease of use. I rate this review an eight overall.

My use case primarily revolves around automating processes in the finance, insurance, automobile, aeronautical, multimedia, and retail sectors. I automated processes in applications like SAP and Oracle, focusing on ERP type applications, API automation, Excel, and web-based automation. These are the areas where I have implemented automation.

The best features of UiPath Platform, in my experience, relate to how accessible the learning resources are compared to other RPA tools. You can find a high volume of data from UiPath Academy or YouTube, making it easy for anyone to learn UiPath Platform. There is no time bound for using UiPath Platform; you can install the Community edition, automate your processes, and easily complete modular certifications. Other RPA tools, such as Automation Anywhere or Blue Prism, have time limits for free use, while UiPath Platform allows unlimited access once you install the Community edition. Most of the features in UiPath Platform, including Agentic AI, Process Mining, data engineering, and document understanding, can be accessed without limits.

Additionally, premium features are available in the Enterprise edition, and transitioning from Community to Enterprise requires merely raising a request. Overall, I find UiPath Platform comfortable and easy to use, and they continuously upgrade their tools and functionalities.

Regarding agentic automation, one of the challenges I sought to overcome by leveraging people, robots, and AI agents in automating processes was the difficulty of integrating multiple applications through UiPath Platform Agentic AI. Recently, UiPath Platform introduced UiPath Maestro, which has significantly resolved many of these problems. I have developed several Agentic AI processes using UiPath Maestro, and everything has worked well. Furthermore, with my prior experience in prompt engineering, UiPath Platform Agentic AI training has instructed me on writing prompts effectively, so I do not face any issues during the development of Agentic processes.

I can say that UiPath Platform has reduced human error by almost 90 percent when compared to doing tasks manually.

To improve, I notice a concern regarding support. For instance, if a vendor encounters an issue with UiPath Platform and is unable to resolve it via UiPath Platform developers or architects, they may raise a support ticket, but there can be delays in response. Additionally, for users who are not vendors but have paid for a UiPath Platform license, reaching the support team can be difficult if they do not respond promptly.

Regarding the pricing of UiPath Platform, I find it expensive compared to other RPA tools.

I have been using UiPath Platform for over the last seven plus years.

In terms of stability, I would rate it nine out of ten.

For scalability, I would rate it ten out of ten.

I would rate vendor support as seven out of ten.

The community surrounding UiPath Platform resembles a free edition tool, with its own community forums. Developers and architects using UiPath Platform can post questions about challenges they face, facilitating a community communication environment where their queries are answered, and discussions take place, similar to social media interactions.

The deployment process of UiPath Platform is very easy. We utilize the CI/CD pipeline, which allows for seamless integration of bot deployment. There is no need to perform additional steps; pushing the code automatically deploys it into the Orchestrator. In earlier deployments, we had to manually publish our code and update many assets in the Orchestrator, but with the CI/CD pipeline, deployment becomes significantly easier.

The amount of time that UiPath Platform automation has freed up from doing manual work depends on the complexity of the process. For instance, in one recently developed reporting process that interacts with Excel and SAP, processing a report file with nearly 300 items would take an hour manually. However, with the automation bot, we complete the entire reporting in about two minutes. That is a significant time saving compared to the one hour it takes manually for processing each item.

When comparing UiPath Platform with other tools, I observe that UiPath Platform is a giant in the automation industry and is continuously developing its tools. Other tools such as Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere seem outdated, receiving few updates. One competitive tool, Microsoft Power Automate, poses some challenges for UiPath Platform, but overall, I find UiPath Platform to be leading in advancement.

Monitoring the tone or sentiment in messages affects operations by facilitating automation. However, I initially struggled to understand the specific implication regarding sentiment. UiPath Platform provides tools, including Excel-based tools within the Automation Hub, where users can submit processes intended for automation and gather relevant information for business analysis. This hub can analyze how many activities are being automated and the benefits derived from such automation.

The biggest benefit I have seen from UiPath Academy courses is the ease of learning and the abundance of exercises provided. If a learner faces challenges in completing an exercise, solutions are also provided. The training progresses from basic to advanced levels, and the training modules feature excellent videos and explanations. If anyone wants to learn UiPath Platform, they can do so effectively through UiPath Academy portal and master the platform.

Automating actions or responses according to messages aligns with the purpose of automation, which is removing human dependency. Automating communication and sentiment analysis can significantly enhance operational efficiencies and improve automation processes overall.

Our clients are primarily medium-sized businesses.

UiPath Platform does require some maintenance, as UiPath Platform continuously upgrades its tools and packages. If there are major issues, updates are necessary; otherwise, regular updates for packages and processes may not be required.

UiPath Platform is purchased through a partner connection, and certain conditions must be met, including the number of licenses purchased. If you meet the required volume, you can partner directly with UiPath Platform; if not, you must complete a solution SSN certification to partner with them.

I have provided this review with an overall rating of eight out of ten.

Our use case for automating with UiPath Platform involves different types of processes, such as processing documents like invoices that need to be updated into the SAP system on a daily basis for payment processing, mimicking the steps that a human user performs.

The best features I appreciate about UiPath Platform are its continuous growth and improvement, evolving from standard automation to more advanced agentic solutions which enhance decision-making capabilities.

UiPath Platform serves as a comprehensive solution for all business processes to be automated, including features such as communication mining that extract automated processes from business users and UiPath Insights for reporting benefits from our automations, including hours saved and business value saved.

With agentic automation on UiPath Platform, I handle components like people, robots, and AI agents through a centralized platform, the UiPath Orchestrator, which allows business users to monitor, manage, and trigger their automations at desired times.

I have been using UiPath Platform for nine years now, and one area for improvement I find challenging is the frequency of product updates; rapid upgrades, such as from version 2022 to 2024, complicate the migration process for organizations with many automations, especially those running on legacy systems.

I have been using UiPath Platform for nine years.

In terms of stability, I would rate UiPath Platform a nine.

Regarding scalability, I find it to be a scalable solution, rating it an eight out of ten.

I would rate the technical support for UiPath Platform an eight.

I prefer UiPath Platform over other software such as Power Automate, ranking it first due to its long-standing presence and the ease of use it offers compared to newer tools, particularly because I have experience working with both.

Deployment timelines for UiPath Platform vary by project; for low-complexity automation projects, it typically takes around three to four weeks from start to finish.

The setup for monitoring tone or sentiment in messages entirely depends on how each organization configures its communication, as there are different ways to install the product, both cloud-based and on-premises.

In my organization, there are over 100 business users utilizing UiPath Platform for their automation needs, while a development team of 10 focuses on developing those automation processes.

Since automating with UiPath Platform, human error has reduced to 0% because the process we automate relies on the standard process that humans perform, and it is significantly faster; for example, while a human takes about five minutes to send an email and raise a ticket, automation reduces that time to just a couple of seconds.

Regarding pricing, I find UiPath Platform to be relatively cost-efficient compared to other automation tools on the market, ranking it first against options such as Blue Prism and Automation Anywhere, particularly when considering the value and capabilities offered.

Currently in my organization, I am deploying UiPath Platform on-premises, but I am considering a hybrid option to leverage some cloud features due to our security requirements.

I prefer UiPath Platform over other software such as Power Automate, ranking it first due to its long-standing presence and the ease of use it offers compared to newer tools, particularly because I have experience working with both.

The UiPath Academy courses serve as my primary source of learning for UiPath Platform, having started in late 2016; there are now over 200 courses available, making it the best resource for gaining detailed knowledge and hands-on experience.

For anyone looking to implement UiPath Platform, I definitely recommend starting with a proof of concept using their 60-day trial version and also engaging with the UiPath Academy for a better understanding of how the platform works. I would rate this review an eight.