Airtable
AirtableExternal reviews
3,268 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Reducing Manual Tracking Effort Through Airtable Automation
What do you like best about the product?
What I liked most about Airtable was how it helped organize engineering coordination, tracking activities, and documentation workflows in a much more structured way compared to managing everything through spreadsheets alone.
While handling BOM updates, drawing-review tracking, project follow-ups, and concession activities, the linked-record structure made it easier to connect related information instead of maintaining multiple disconnected Excel files. Different teams could quickly check status, ownership, pending actions, and review history without repeatedly asking for updates.
The calendar, grid, and Kanban-style views were especially useful during project coordination because each team preferred a different way of monitoring activities. I also used automation rules and reminders for repetitive follow-up tasks, which reduced manual coordination effort during busy project cycles.Another practical benefit was the flexibility. Without depending heavily on IT support, workflows could be adjusted quickly whenever project requirements changed.
From a UI/UX perspective, the platform felt cleaner and easier to navigate than traditional database tools, and onboarding new users was relatively simple because the spreadsheet-style layout felt familiar initially.
I also found the AI-assisted summarization and automation suggestions useful while reviewing larger data sets and ongoing project updates, especially during coordination-heavy activities.
While handling BOM updates, drawing-review tracking, project follow-ups, and concession activities, the linked-record structure made it easier to connect related information instead of maintaining multiple disconnected Excel files. Different teams could quickly check status, ownership, pending actions, and review history without repeatedly asking for updates.
The calendar, grid, and Kanban-style views were especially useful during project coordination because each team preferred a different way of monitoring activities. I also used automation rules and reminders for repetitive follow-up tasks, which reduced manual coordination effort during busy project cycles.Another practical benefit was the flexibility. Without depending heavily on IT support, workflows could be adjusted quickly whenever project requirements changed.
From a UI/UX perspective, the platform felt cleaner and easier to navigate than traditional database tools, and onboarding new users was relatively simple because the spreadsheet-style layout felt familiar initially.
I also found the AI-assisted summarization and automation suggestions useful while reviewing larger data sets and ongoing project updates, especially during coordination-heavy activities.
What do you dislike about the product?
One limitation I noticed is that performance can slow down slightly when bases become very large and heavily connected with automations and linked records.
I also felt that advanced permissions, reporting, and analytics capabilities could be more flexible for complex operational workflows involving multiple teams and restricted-access data.
Although the interface is user-friendly, designing larger workflows properly still requires planning; otherwise bases can become difficult to manage over time.
I also felt that advanced permissions, reporting, and analytics capabilities could be more flexible for complex operational workflows involving multiple teams and restricted-access data.
Although the interface is user-friendly, designing larger workflows properly still requires planning; otherwise bases can become difficult to manage over time.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Before using Airtable, engineering coordination activities, project tracking, and documentation follow-ups were spread across spreadsheets, emails, and separate trackers, which made status visibility and ownership tracking difficult.
For example, while managing review activities, BOM updates, and multi-stage project coordination tasks, teams often depended on manual follow-up communication to understand pending actions and latest updates.
Airtable solved this by centralizing related project information into one connected workflow with linked records, dashboards, reminders, and customized views. Instead of manually combining information from multiple trackers, teams could directly view project status, ownership, pending approvals, and documentation progress in real time.
This reduced duplicate tracking effort, improved coordination visibility, and simplified follow-up management across ongoing engineering activities.
From an ROI perspective, it reduced time spent maintaining separate trackers and improved workflow efficiency by automating repetitive coordination and reporting activities.
For example, while managing review activities, BOM updates, and multi-stage project coordination tasks, teams often depended on manual follow-up communication to understand pending actions and latest updates.
Airtable solved this by centralizing related project information into one connected workflow with linked records, dashboards, reminders, and customized views. Instead of manually combining information from multiple trackers, teams could directly view project status, ownership, pending approvals, and documentation progress in real time.
This reduced duplicate tracking effort, improved coordination visibility, and simplified follow-up management across ongoing engineering activities.
From an ROI perspective, it reduced time spent maintaining separate trackers and improved workflow efficiency by automating repetitive coordination and reporting activities.
Versatile Tool for Managing Entire Business
What do you like best about the product?
I like how Airtable is so versatile. It's essentially a database or a spreadsheet, but the versatility of the different ways you can view the data and the different cell or object types is really helpful. You can interact between tables and relate data to each other really easily. Also, it integrates really well with Claude Code, allowing me to send data back and forth while talking to Claude Code. Using Airtable saves a lot of time as it lets me house all my data together and view it in ways that solve specific problems.
What do you dislike about the product?
The only thing that I don't like about it is that you can't easily go between bases. You have to click a couple of times to get between bases. I would like it if there was a kind of menu of all your bases that you could just click on, like a folder structure. That's the only gripe I have with it.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Airtable to run my whole business, managing CRM, tasks, and important lists all in one place, making it versatile and cost-effective. This integration allows me to relate data easily and save on multiple subscriptions.
Easy to Use, Powerful Automations Beyond Excel
What do you like best about the product?
The ease of use and the range of things I can do with it -- it can do things I wish I could figure out in Excel (easy things) and it can automate processes linked up with Softr and other services (much more complext)
What do you dislike about the product?
It's expensive for me, a low-income self-employed consultant.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use it in many different ways. I built an app with Softr and Airtable holds and manages all the data. I track grants from loi to reporting. We've used it to create maps on our website. Many things.
Airtable: A Flexible and Powerful Platform for Building Business Systems Fast
What do you like best about the product?
What I like best about Airtable is the flexibility to build real business systems without starting from a heavy development process. As a business automation consultant, I use Airtable for many different clients, and it allows me to design databases, connect processes, create interfaces, and automate repetitive work in one platform.
The biggest value for me is that Airtable is both simple enough for business users and powerful enough for complex workflows. I can start with a clear data structure, add relationships between tables, build views for different teams, and then connect automations or external tools when needed. The integrations are very important for my work, because Airtable can become the center of the process and still connect to tools like forms, email, project management platforms, Make, Zapier, n8n and custom APIs.
I also like the Interface Designer very much. It helps me create clean working screens for users, so they do not need to see the full database behind the system. This makes adoption much easier, especially for teams that are moving from spreadsheets or manual processes. In most cases, users understand the system quite quickly, and there is also good documentation and community knowledge that helps with onboarding and support.
From a performance point of view, Airtable is usually stable and responsive for the operational systems I build. Of course, when the solution becomes very complex, it is important to design the base correctly, but with good architecture it works well for many business use cases.
For pricing and ROI, I think the value is strong. It can save a lot of development time and reduce manual work, so for many companies the return is much faster than building a custom system from zero. The AI and intelligence features are also interesting, especially for things like summarizing information, classifying records, and helping teams get insights from their data.
For me, Airtable is not just a database tool. It is a strong foundation for building practical operational systems quickly, while still keeping the solution organized, scalable, and easy to improve over time.
The biggest value for me is that Airtable is both simple enough for business users and powerful enough for complex workflows. I can start with a clear data structure, add relationships between tables, build views for different teams, and then connect automations or external tools when needed. The integrations are very important for my work, because Airtable can become the center of the process and still connect to tools like forms, email, project management platforms, Make, Zapier, n8n and custom APIs.
I also like the Interface Designer very much. It helps me create clean working screens for users, so they do not need to see the full database behind the system. This makes adoption much easier, especially for teams that are moving from spreadsheets or manual processes. In most cases, users understand the system quite quickly, and there is also good documentation and community knowledge that helps with onboarding and support.
From a performance point of view, Airtable is usually stable and responsive for the operational systems I build. Of course, when the solution becomes very complex, it is important to design the base correctly, but with good architecture it works well for many business use cases.
For pricing and ROI, I think the value is strong. It can save a lot of development time and reduce manual work, so for many companies the return is much faster than building a custom system from zero. The AI and intelligence features are also interesting, especially for things like summarizing information, classifying records, and helping teams get insights from their data.
For me, Airtable is not just a database tool. It is a strong foundation for building practical operational systems quickly, while still keeping the solution organized, scalable, and easy to improve over time.
What do you dislike about the product?
What I dislike about Airtable is that when a base becomes more complex, it can be harder to manage and maintain over time. Airtable is very flexible, but this also means that if the architecture is not planned well from the beginning, the system can become messy with many views, fields, automations, and dependencies.
Another point is performance. For small and medium solutions Airtable works very well, but in larger bases with many records, linked tables, lookups, rollups, and automations, sometimes the experience can become slower. This is especially important when clients use Airtable as a core operational system and not only as a simple database.
I also think the pricing can become a challenge for some clients. The value is usually strong, but when a company needs many users, advanced permissions, interfaces, automations, or AI features, the total cost can grow quite fast. For smaller businesses, this sometimes makes the decision harder.
In addition, I would like to see more advanced native tools for documentation, change tracking, and automation debugging. As an implementer, it is important for me to understand what changed, why an automation failed, and how different parts of the system are connected.
Overall, I still think Airtable is a very strong platform, but these areas can make complex implementations more challenging and require good planning and governance.
Another point is performance. For small and medium solutions Airtable works very well, but in larger bases with many records, linked tables, lookups, rollups, and automations, sometimes the experience can become slower. This is especially important when clients use Airtable as a core operational system and not only as a simple database.
I also think the pricing can become a challenge for some clients. The value is usually strong, but when a company needs many users, advanced permissions, interfaces, automations, or AI features, the total cost can grow quite fast. For smaller businesses, this sometimes makes the decision harder.
In addition, I would like to see more advanced native tools for documentation, change tracking, and automation debugging. As an implementer, it is important for me to understand what changed, why an automation failed, and how different parts of the system are connected.
Overall, I still think Airtable is a very strong platform, but these areas can make complex implementations more challenging and require good planning and governance.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Airtable is solving for me and for my clients: how to move from spreadsheets, manual updates, emails, and disconnected tools into one organized operational system.
As a business automation consultant, I use Airtable to help companies structure their information in a clear way. Instead of having data in many Excel files or different systems, Airtable allows me to create one source of truth with connected tables, views, permissions, interfaces, and automations.
Airtable also helps reduce manual work. Many processes that were done by copy-paste, follow-up emails, or manual status updates can be automated. This saves time, reduces mistakes, and gives managers better visibility into what is happening in the business.
As a business automation consultant, I use Airtable to help companies structure their information in a clear way. Instead of having data in many Excel files or different systems, Airtable allows me to create one source of truth with connected tables, views, permissions, interfaces, and automations.
Airtable also helps reduce manual work. Many processes that were done by copy-paste, follow-up emails, or manual status updates can be automated. This saves time, reduces mistakes, and gives managers better visibility into what is happening in the business.
Highly Efficient, User-Friendly, and Versatile
What do you like best about the product?
I like how easy it is to make projects in Airtable that are dynamic and provide many views for different projects and team members. It integrates well with our workflows and is very easy to use, but also offers complex problem-solving tools. As we work through different aspects of a project, I appreciate being able to review an overall view of the project or get more granular with individual tasks. We switched to Airtable because it was more robust and had better features. The transition was made easier by integrating our Sales POS system into the platform along with our production tasks. The introduction library from Airtable was very helpful for training our team, despite the initial learning curve for some members.
What do you dislike about the product?
I would just like more integrations that are native to the platform to avoid having to use Zapier. I just find that some tasks that I would like to automate are not available sometimes when researching new products to work into our tech stack.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Airtable for managing social posts, assets, and project management tasks like inventory and sales tracking. It's easy to create dynamic projects with different views, integrates well with workflows, and provides complex problem-solving tools.
Excellent for Organization, Room for Improved Collaboration
What do you like best about the product?
I use Airtable to keep assets organized and easily filter them. I really like the filtering feature, it makes my tasks easy, especially since I have to look at content across several languages and other categories. Through the filtering feature, I can easily find what I am looking for and apply that information to other tools I am using such as WordPress and Canto. One of the vendors I work with integrates our Airtable content with WordPress.
What do you dislike about the product?
I am not able to work on the same time with a colleague at the same time, causing confusion.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Airtable helps me keep assets organized and easily filter them, ensuring I have all the content I need and understand asset relationships. The filtering feature makes handling content in different languages easier and integrates well with tools like WordPress and Canto.
Airtable Became the Backbone of Our Marketing Operations
What do you like best about the product?
"For our marketing team, Airtable has become the backbone of the entire department’s operations. It allows us to keep detailed track of projects, tasks, deadlines and responsible parties all in one place, which eliminates the chaos of scattered email or message follow-ups. Before using it, we used to coordinate deadlines across different chats and documents; now, with the calendar and Kanban views, every team member knows exactly what they have to do and by when. Its intuitive interface meant the whole team adopted it without the need for extensive training, and the ability to customise databases for each type of project makes it adaptable to any campaign or editorial launch we manage."
What do you dislike about the product?
"One of the weaknesses we’ve encountered is with integrations: although Airtable offers connections to various external tools, we’ve experienced occasional glitches that disrupt our workflow and take time to diagnose and resolve. It’s not something that happens all the time, but when it does, it affects the team’s operations. On the other hand, the pricing model can quickly become expensive: we have a paid plan, but every time we need to add a new collaborator to the workspace, the additional cost per user is high for the budget of a marketing department in a medium-sized company. It would be ideal to have more flexible plans that better adapt to the team’s growth without incurring significant extra costs."
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Airtable solves one of the most common challenges faced by marketing teams: a lack of visibility into the actual status of each project. Previously, spotting delays or bottlenecks relied on meetings or follow-up messages; now, with a single glance at the dashboard, we can identify outstanding tasks, responsible parties and potential roadblocks before they become a problem. As for centralisation, the most tangible benefit is that all the department’s projects — from campaigns and editorial launches to administrative tasks — are housed in a single space, accessible to the whole team in real time. This significantly reduces the time spent searching for information in emails or chats, and allows us to focus on execution rather than coordination.
Effortless Integrations and Automation with Airtable
What do you like best about the product?
I find Airtable very easy to use, with minimal setup and training required. It's great because I can get a lot out of it without much effort. The initial setup didn't take a lot of time and I didn't have to resort to any documentation, which made it very easy to do.
What do you dislike about the product?
Some of the ability to edit columns. You know, you would like for it to work a little bit more like Excel.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Airtable makes it easy to organize information and integrate with Make, automating and simplifying my social media tasks.
A Review on Airtable
What do you like best about the product?
Using Airtable it is very easy to manage the project
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing of upgrade plan is expensive
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Airtable to manage my club projects
Easy Project Management and Data Organization
What do you like best about the product?
to easely manage project and every datas
What do you dislike about the product?
maybe too expensive for private users...
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
combining spreadsheet simplicity with database relational power, widely used for managing complex workflows, content, and projects.
showing 1 - 10