We use the solution to monitor the client’s computers and to support computers in small offices.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Simple tasks are not as easy to implement
Better than SolarWinds MSP
NinjaOne - Great potential
The PC device management is easy-ish to use being able to manage PC's with manual overrides and also what other rules to be applied (e.e. remote control software to be pushed out, restart frequency, container it sits in, etc)
Ninja was fairly easy to implement & manage as it's almost entirely web based with a lightweight client.
The Ninja Dojo has great resources not just for NinjaOne but best practices as well & support is quite responsive.
The bundled Bitdefender AV is quite lacking in management. You can only manage it from the Ninja Console & cleaning up malware with it is quite difficult. There's no bulk select feature, so you have to manually clear each alert one by one in the event of a false positive being picked up multiple times.
The ticketing is quite basic, it could use with extra features such as the ability to use custom domains for the support email address. It also has problems displaying images properly where they are get stripped out of emails received or not show up. Likewise,attachments can be somewhat selective in what items get passed through, some attachment items such as eml files get dropped.
Asset management is also a little more challenging in here as it's hard to get a full overview of all your devices properly. You can't get a nice spreadsheet with all the details you see in the individual device such as spec list, usernames, etc.
Proper RMM support for our technicians - Previously we used Teams calling to provide basic screen sharing & remote access capability. This was quite restrictive for our team as Teams screen sharing was very limited in interaction
Asset visibility & monitoring - We still utilise the PDQ inventory software to help catalogue our PC assets. This however had the issue with devices not reporting when they are off our network. Ninja helped provide visibility with this as it's entirely internet based allowing us to take a two pronged approach to track and manage assets.
Mixed bag but strong modern RMM
The experience was great would do it again
Extremely user Friendly
Works well for basic PC management
It's a little confusing at the start, however you can on board without training
Reporting seems very light.
S1 Integration has a lot to be desired
No BACKING UP OF NAS... only backup TO NAS
No Office 365 Backup... Common issue
No SQL/Exchange granular backup..
Ninja is very good for to window workstation but guy's need to improve for Linux and Mac devices.
Helps to monitor my client’s computers and support computers, but UI needs improvement
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most relevant feature is the monitoring, which provides built-in tools for sending commands. The TeamViewer bot option also works well as part of the scripting. NinjaOne has had some initial issues with the remote connection. NinjaOne is the cheapest way to connect to Azure remotely because a TeamViewer subscription for a year is far more expensive.
What needs improvement?
The graphical user interface could be improved. It is not very pleasant to look at, and it can make the experience of setting up and monitoring computers all day boring. The interface could be more user-friendly and visually appealing. For example, when I look at the PeerOS interface, it has changed a lot over time. It is now much more user-friendly and visually appealing. I am tempted to switch to PeerOS because of its interface. However, NinjaOne is better in terms of usability and features.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using NinjaOne for four years. We are using the latest version of the solution.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is highly stable. There were no logging and remote connection issues. Everything works as it should. Sometimes, when I send a command to a remote computer, I don't know whether the command is taking effect. This is an issue for me sometimes on Teamviewer. The command is executed on my side but not on the client side.
I rate the solution’s stability a nine out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability is excellent because it is sold per device. When you sign up, they give you x number of users, and you have to buy into a certain number of devices. For example, I had to buy 50 devices when I signed up. If you exceed 50 devices, then there's another tier.
The downside is that it can be costly if you only come in with 10 computers. For example, if you want to use NinjaOne but only have 10 computers, you must sign up for 50 computers.
There are 25 computers connected to this solution.
I rate the solution’s scalability an eight out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I used TeamViewer for core remote monitoring, but it was expensive. I wasn't aware of remote monitoring, and all the IT specialists were changing. I did a lot of on-site support and credentialing with customers who paid me a retainer. Before SolarWinds took over, they were doing roadshows in the country, and that's how I got exposed to the managed services model and how the market had been changing. The pricing model was insane at the time. They've adjusted their pricing models to be more affordable now.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is straightforward. There's nothing complicated about setting up NinjaOne. You can either tell them whether you want an agent for a specific company, or you can set up the companies first and then add agents to them. Whichever way you choose, it's pretty easy. I've had no issues and haven't dealt with support at Ninja.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I rate the solution’s pricing a five out of ten, where one is the lowest and ten is the most expensive.
What other advice do I have?
If you are new to the MSP space and need an easy-to-set-up that can grow with your business and licensing, NinjaOne is an excellent option.
There is a concern about the slow UI. There is no clear visibility on whether a command is being issued by the user or the client, which takes longer than expected.
Overall, I rate the solution a seven out of ten.