Remote monitoring, managing, and software deployment are our main use cases for NinjaOne. We use NinjaOne daily to add our MDR to devices and to deliver critical and secure updates as well as manage compliance on devices.
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Great Remote Access with Minor Lag Issues
Efficient patch management, but high price
Versatile Remote Support Options, But Room for Improvement
Has simplified remote software delivery and script management but needs improved reporting flexibility and better Mac support
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
NinjaOne's best features include ease of use regarding enablement and deployment, a broad selection and ability of software enablement, and API deliveries. Using CrowdStrike, we are able to tie in NinjaOne's API to have these automatically deliver to endpoints upon addition of those devices to a group with that policy deployed to it. NinjaOne has positively impacted our organization by making delivery easier for our end users and improving the ability to create scripts, manage scripts, and check status of devices and their compliance. This easier delivery with NinjaOne gives us oversight on devices without having to be on the call or remoted in directly to a device.
What needs improvement?
NinjaOne can be improved by more flexibility in reporting and by the ability to have more than one NinjaOne agent on a device at a time, as this is a significant issue in our current state. The ability to not have a NinjaOne agent or multiple NinjaOne agents on a singular device is a big pain point for the device, and secondly, the macOS support is also what keeps it from being a higher score. I would rate NinjaOne a seven on a scale of one to ten.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have subscribed to NinjaOne for a couple of years now.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
NinjaOne is stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
NinjaOne's scalability is excellent.
How are customer service and support?
Customer support from NinjaOne is excellent. I would rate the customer support a nine on a scale of one to ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We previously used a different solution. We switched from Kaseya to NinjaOne due to multiple reasons, including bringing the solution in-house instead of using a third party, as well as price and features.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very good. Our account manager was very communicative during the phase, and the long process, mostly drawn out by our side, was handled very well.
What was our ROI?
I have not seen a return on investment at this time.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing was very good. Our account manager was very communicative during the phase, and the long process, mostly drawn out by our side, was handled very well.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing NinjaOne, we evaluated other options. I looked into Kaseya, Atera, Datto, ConnectWise, and a few others.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise others looking into using NinjaOne to absolutely test NinjaOne and go through a bunch of use case scenarios to find if it is fitting for their use case, as well as meeting with their sales team to discuss use cases. I would rate this review a seven on a scale of one to ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Great for Managing Installed Programs and File Transfers
Patch Management and Remote Access are reliable
It also helps us a lot that Ninja gives us alternate channels to reach our remote devices. We use the command-line access all the time as well as the remote GUI features through ninja's new remote client. It's more reliable than RDP and easier to maintain than the other third-party remote access tools we have used in the past.
The support organization for the product is also excellent. I have used them frequently to answer questions, get ideas for how to use the system better, and to report and get fixes for bugs. They're always responsive and helpful in a way that's rare in the space of SaaS products.
Effortless Multi-Device Patching and Remote Access Anywhere
Efficient Dashboard and Ticketing, But FedRAMP Version Lacks Key Features
User-Friendly Layout, But Pricing Differences Frustrate
Seamless Background Remote Access and File Transfers
The ability to make our own reports and even columns and filters are great.
It's a tool we are using every day.
Anything else I have issues with is probably a lack of knowledge using the RMM.