Calabrio ONE
A Great Investment That Streamlined Our Workflow and CRM Call Management
Time management has improved and AI forecasting now aligns shifts with real demand
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Calabrio ONE is for schedule management in our dynamic environment, as it helps us manage our shifts effectively. It helps us strategize on shifts, plan, and ensure that every employee is well assigned within a well-stipulated timeline for working.
In addition to shift management, I find that Calabrio ONE has AI intelligence features that have recently been integrated, helping us with forecasting that seems to be very accurate as our shift pattern consistently aligns with the actual volume of customer inquiries we receive.
What is most valuable?
Calabrio ONE has made things smoother and more reliable for my team because it is very reliable when it comes to time management. It provides real-time updates to ensure that I never miss any shift change, which is a huge benefit for my daily workflow.
The best feature that Calabrio ONE offers in my experience is very reliable and fast customer support. What makes the customer support reliable is that when we contact them with an issue, they usually respond very quickly and provide the right feedback on most of the inquiries that we make regarding the operation of Calabrio ONE.
Regarding the features, the automation in Calabrio ONE is impressive because the platform helps us automate workflows and deliver measurable outcomes. Calabrio ONE has positively impacted my organization by helping us with time management, scheduling shifts, and enhancing efficient workflows. I can say that it is the game changer in that field.
The accuracy and reliability of output from Calabrio ONE are impressive, especially when using it for AI intelligence for forecasting, as it provides accurate and consistent data that helps us plan for our shifts. The governance and security of Calabrio ONE are very high because they have secured the data with end-to-end encryption, and they govern our data efficiently without any cases of data leakage or mismanagement that I have heard of.
What needs improvement?
Calabrio ONE can be improved because the biggest challenge is that it is unnecessarily complicated, as the reporting and data exploration tools are somewhat complex for new users. The user interface feels more clogged and unintuitive in several areas, making it not easy to manage simple tasks, which requires too many clicks to complete.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Calabrio ONE for the last one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Calabrio ONE is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability of Calabrio ONE is high, as the onboarding process is simple and flexible for new users, making it easy to manage time and allocate employees to different work portfolios.
How are customer service and support?
The best feature that Calabrio ONE offers in my experience is very reliable and fast customer support. What makes the customer support reliable is that when we contact them with an issue, they usually respond very quickly and provide the right feedback on most of the inquiries that we make regarding the operation of Calabrio ONE.
The customer support is awesome, very proactive, and they are easily reachable, always responding to calls quickly.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not previously used any other solution before Calabrio ONE.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with Calabrio ONE, as it has saved us a lot of time planning and managing shifts.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing has been good, as they are affordable, and when we increase features, the price goes up if we need to work on more substantial data that does not come with the initial subscription.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Calabrio ONE, the other option I evaluated was Agent for Sales.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Calabrio ONE is to consider it if they are struggling with time management and shift scheduling, as it will be very helpful and is affordable for most business enterprises. I can say that Calabrio ONE is a very efficient tool, and I would totally recommend it to other business enterprises because it is the best when it comes to time management and shift scheduling. I am rating this review a nine overall.
A Giant Leap in Process Automation with Custom Reports and Real-Time Tracking
Efficient, but with Problems in the Mobile App
Calabrio ONE Boosts Adherence, Efficiency, and Secure Call Performance Tools
Reliable Global Telephony with Easy UI, Strong Analytics, and Expert Support
Improved call insights and sentiment analysis but still need simpler setup and better documentation
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Calabrio ONE is for reporting, as I have implemented Calabrio ONE for one of our clients called FedEx. They use Calabrio ONE for reporting, so we integrated Calabrio ONE with our contact center and provided the recordings and WFM feature through Calabrio ONE.
In our case, Calabrio ONE is specifically used for recording and reporting purposes, but WEM or WFM, as some people mention it, is also one of the features. Although the priority is still recording, they want to keep their recordings through Calabrio ONE on their own servers, so it is an on-premises solution that we installed and implemented.
I have installed Calabrio ONE for several customers in the public cloud, and for FedEx, it was an on-premises solution installed in the customer's environment.
What is most valuable?
After studying Calabrio ONE throughout those years, I really appreciate the recording, workforce management, and quality management features, including advanced analytics of Calabrio ONE, which were performing well at that time in comparison to other software systems. I am mostly concentrated on the recording part, and I was part of the installation, specifically the 11.5 version. There were a few things that could have been improved at that point in time, but I believe that in the latest version, Calabrio ONE has improved.
I have tested thoroughly the recording features of Calabrio ONE, and it has sentiment analysis; when you see the recording, if you have configured some words, it tells you whether the customer is happy or angry, showing the emotion of the customer during the recording. Calabrio ONE's recording interface is very easy to access, very easy to explore, and every option is clearly mentioned. Once you click on the recording, it is easy to configure how to save it. When you analyze the recordings, you can clearly see a graph and sentiment analysis. Calabrio ONE has also added the natural language feature, so even if you're using a bot or the other person is using a bot, they can assess those things. That is one of the best features I appreciate.
Calabrio ONE has positively impacted our organization as the clients were happy with the implementation; they initially used NICE and switched to Calabrio ONE. Calabrio ONE's initial versions, before the 10.x versions, were not very good, but I installed 11.5, which had many features that the customer really appreciated. It helped them arrange their recordings, keeping them for a certain time and then transferring them to a local drive. Calabrio ONE's interface was easy for the customer to understand, and the training we provided helped agents easily grasp how calls were recorded and stored.
I believe there were metrics indicating customer satisfaction, with at least a 15 to 20 percent increase after using Calabrio ONE software. I am not sure about specific metrics like time saved or fewer errors, as those are with the customer. We had reports during the testing phase focusing on recording features, sentiment analysis, and related aspects.
What needs improvement?
I think Calabrio ONE is normal software with a stronghold on WFM. Calabrio ONE's latest version excels in recording and analytics, but some customers flagged complexities and reporting gaps. Calabrio ONE can improve the installation process; an automated, unified installer performing checks would be beneficial. Nowadays, software capabilities could provide AI-guided assistance through installation steps.
Calabrio ONE can learn from Cisco in providing documentation more easily, with all details clearly available. I believe the documentation needs to be more detailed, categorized, and segregated so a person does not have to sift through a whole document just to locate specific information.
Calabrio ONE needs many improvements from a high-level view. Calabrio ONE's implementation was not straightforward during my time, and Calabrio ONE should work on marketing and partnerships with other cloud contact centers, especially since I have seen CCaaS providers recommend other software but not Calabrio ONE.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Calabrio ONE specifically for about four years.
How was the initial setup?
I felt that integrating Calabrio ONE with a contact center is straightforward and easy. Calabrio ONE's deployment is easy, and the documentation provided or available on the website is very clear, with screenshots included, making it easier for even a new person undertaking that for the first time.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
If someone is using Calabrio ONE and is happy, I encourage them to keep using it, but there are other software options in the market. Many CCaaS providers offer built-in features for recording and reporting, which is something to consider unless there are specific requirements for using Calabrio ONE.
What other advice do I have?
I have read about Calabrio ONE's WFM feature, scheduling, and forecasting process and tried to configure that for FedEx, but they did not go for my pitch as it was not their priority at that time.
I have not worked in the security part of Calabrio ONE, but according to the documents, the AI governance framework emphasizes customer data ownership, security, and regulatory compliance, which seems appropriate.
At that point in time, AI was not as common as it is now, so I would not say I have used its capabilities apart from the NLP and sentiment analysis, but AI is used for interaction scoring in quality monitoring.
I would rate this review a 6.
Seamless Ecosystem Integration with Powerful Real-Time Scheduling
Advanced forecasting and self-service scheduling have improved planning and agent experience
What is our primary use case?
I use Calabrio ONE for small retail verticals from one of the projects like Mattel and other pieces as well for delivering the POC at the client side. I was working on almost three to four projects where I have been deeply involved with Calabrio integrations with Amazon Connect and C-CAST.
My main use case for Calabrio ONE in those projects is basically for agent forecasting and scheduling. At that time, the native integration with Amazon Connect was not available, so we were considering other vendors as well, but we went with Calabrio because it was very impressive at that time. The AI insight was phenomenal in terms of reporting and analytics capabilities during what was shown, and it really provided value to the company. Overall, the performance and helping the supervisor with scheduling and forecasting was really good.
Calabrio ONE helped with forecasting and scheduling by evolving in its capabilities over time. When we were moving with C-CAST and Amazon Connect integration, and when we compared with NICE and other vendors we were dealing with, we found Calabrio more sophisticated in terms of advanced forecasting and analyzing the E-S and historical interaction data. The focus on managing holidays as well as weekends and month-end spikes was very quick and intuitive, and very easy to use for generating forecasts for queuing skills and channels. Overall, it helped with the client regarding events like Black Friday when suddenly the spike happens. The historical data and forecasting were increasing in terms of estimating how many agents are required each hour. It was really helpful overall. The performance in terms of agent skill clarifications and time zone management was very helpful because the agents were in different time zones.
What is most valuable?
The best features Calabrio ONE offers, in my experience, stand out as solving real operational challenges from an operational perspective. Everyone, including the supervisor and other stakeholders, focuses on the operational challenges. Calabrio is evolving not just in forecasting but in forecasting versus actual demand and helping the supervisor make adjustments. I really appreciate the workforce forecasting because Calabrio forecasting uses historical trends to predict the staffing requirement and allows organizations to proactively plan resources instead of just reacting to unexpected call spikes. However, it is far more than just managing unexpected call spikes. I appreciate the self-service features, giving an agent the ability to request leave, swap shifts, and volunteer for overtime, which reduces the supervisor workload and improves the employee experience.
Calabrio ONE has positively impacted my organization by making administrative tasks and forecasting easier. Obviously, the administrative tasks and forecasting things have become easier. This is what overall we integrated Calabrio for and this is what the main functionality we use. It was very quick and easily integrated, not just from the agent perspective and delivery perspective, but also from the integration perspective. Those things were pretty much easier compared to other vendors.
After using Calabrio ONE, I noticed measurable outcomes such as improved schedule adherence, reduced overtime costs, and reduced understaffing and overstaffing because the forecasts were more accurate. More importantly, agent satisfaction improved. With my experience, I can confirm that due to the self-service option with swap and leave request functionality, it really gave a very positive impact.
What needs improvement?
Calabrio ONE can be improved in the area of predictive workforce planning. I believe predictive workforce planning would be more valuable if the platform could automatically identify unusual patterns, such as forecasting the impact of a new product launch or weather event, rather than relying mainly on historical trends, because something new that the business is coming up with. It would be more focused towards the predictive way. Dashboard customization would benefit from more drag-and-drop dashboard customization for supervisors to make reporting more flexible, similar to JIRA-type functionality, which would be helpful.
There are certain scenarios when we competed with other vendors because nowadays Amazon Connect is also evolving in terms of WFM, but I do understand that the out-of-the-box features are not fully delivering what Calabrio delivers. In terms of thousands of agents across multiple sites, it is still evolving but not at the same level as Calabrio. When we look at other focus areas towards Verint and NICE, obviously we need to improve from that perspective as well when talking about market leaders. I am sure Calabrio is also evolving as a market leader because of the continuous improvement of the performance dashboard and Agent Assist with AI. These are the new features which I am still yet to explore, such as generative AI capabilities. I think Calabrio is still evolving. That feature I am yet to explore, maybe I am not aware of the new things because it has been almost a year since I have been using it.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used Calabrio ONE for almost a year.
What other advice do I have?
The self-service options, such as shift swaps or leave requests, have greatly impacted the day-to-day experience for agents and supervisors. There are multiple skills involved in managing scenarios, and this is what I really experienced when managing 100 plus agents. When we talk about large contact centers, it is not possible to manage manually, especially compared to previous engagements with JPMorgan Chase and others, where it is a very cumbersome method. In real scenarios, an agent can easily request to take a leave next Friday or swap an evening shift. The supervisor has to check the staffing level, verify the service level, and each request takes 5 to 10 minutes, and there are 20 to 30 requests per day. That is two to five hours spent on administrative work unnecessarily. Calabrio ONE fills that particular gap, and it is one of the best features I appreciate.
My advice for others looking into using Calabrio ONE is that it is more as per the cost and other things, which is really helpful from that perspective. I would really recommend it in terms of workforce management, especially from the Amazon perspective since I am working with Amazon Connect. First, evaluate whether the native workforce management capability meets your needs. If you require more advanced workforce optimization, sophisticated scheduling, or support for multiple contact platforms, Calabrio ONE is definitely worth considering. I choose an eight as the rating because it delivers strong value, but more AI could be more richly injected in the form of generative AI where I want to see deeper generative AI capabilities rather than just staffing functionalities, such as actions to move three agents from queue A to queue B between 2:00 PM and 4:00 PM to maintain the target service level.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Real-time adherence monitoring has improved agent scheduling and daily performance tracking
What is our primary use case?
Our main use case for Calabrio ONE is in scheduling and adherence, where we use it to track agent performance and adherence throughout the day. We also use it for scheduling and forecasting. The main use that we have on a daily basis is the adherence part, which involves checking correct adherence to schedules and comparing the current actual schedule with what agents are doing in the CRM.
The adherence tracking helps my team by providing a current and actual view of how many agents we have in those intervals and whether they are adhering to the current schedule and performing the activities they are supposed to be based on their previous scheduling. For example, we are working on an account which is built by adherence and requires monitoring by interval.
We have Calabrio ONE linked with our CRM, and that is mainly the use that we do in real-time because Calabrio ONE is predominantly used by our real-time team. That is the goal and how we are using it right now.
What is most valuable?
The best features Calabrio ONE offers include one feature that is very useful for adjusting schedules and monitoring adherence during the day, as it has shortcuts for entering plain schedules or correcting adherence with keyboard shortcuts rather than using the mouse. This aspect is important for monitoring in real-time, especially since we have many tasks to manage. That is something I appreciate the most.
I find the reporting part of Calabrio ONE very useful based on how we schedule for the real-time aspect. It provides visibility on how many agents we have allocated, which helps us understand our daily allocation better. Although it has been a while since I used the reporting feature, it was very user-friendly compared to counterparts such as Genesys or Verint, which had issues with person names in their reports, whereas Calabrio ONE's reports are easy and simple to navigate.
Calabrio ONE positively impacts our organization by making adherence increase, even though scheduling takes the same amount of time. This is not just about Calabrio ONE; we do have a real-time team that fully utilizes its capabilities in their duties. It is a partnership between the team's performance and the tool's usefulness. Since we are pushing agents to adhere to the actual schedule, it has been helpful for generating reports and real-time alerts.
Our current adherence is at 90%, while our goal was to reach 95%, which is very challenging. Since we have been using Calabrio ONE from the beginning, we are getting closer to that percentage. However, it is not solely the effectiveness of Calabrio ONE tools; it is a teamwork effort between the analysts and the tool itself as we track how many agents we have in specific spots.
What needs improvement?
Calabrio ONE could be improved with shortcuts, as removing them or making them harder to access is an issue. Additionally, there is some lag during scheduling and adherence processes; for instance, one agent might appear available right when they are scheduled in the CRM, but Calabrio ONE shows them as disconnected. While this is not a repetitive issue that we have reported to the Calabrio ONE vendor, it could benefit from a review, particularly in how it affects BPOs such as mine.
I would appreciate understanding how the acquisition of Verint will add value to Calabrio ONE or if it is purely about gaining more market share, or if they plan to use Verint's background to enhance the Calabrio ONE team.
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Calabrio ONE is to give it a chance. It has been very useful and has been around in the market for a long time; the company has also acquired Verint. Calabrio ONE offers many capabilities in the workforce tool and has been a strong competitor in the market. It has been successfully deployed at Netflix, a major company, which demonstrates its trustworthiness.
Regarding Calabrio ONE's AI capabilities, my company has two-factor authentication, so I would say it is very secure. I do not have many details beyond that, but you can access it from virtually anywhere. In my position, I can use it on my cell phone, but it requires two-factor authentication, which makes it very secure.
I appreciate the user interface of Calabrio ONE because it is simple, which is valued since analysts do not spend much time looking at alerts and agent appearances in the real-time view. It makes our work much easier. I would rate my overall experience with Calabrio ONE as an 8 out of 10.