At Shopee, I worked with numerous database schemas to find out which table columns belonged to which schema. We utilized Elastic Search to manage metadata for millions of tables, allowing us to search efficiently. Besides that, we used Logstash to put all the log files in Elastic Search for easy searchability.
External reviews
221 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Search efficiency improves with enhanced metadata and log management
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
Elastic Search significantly improved my work. Previously, when searching for text that appears in the middle of strings, the process was time-consuming. Elastic Search enables efficient searching, enhancing system performance and responsiveness. I can also collect logs through Kafka, send them to Elastic Search, and create indices, thus managing logs and customizing searches easily.
What is most valuable?
Elastic Search provides features such as stemming and range-based queries to search log files efficiently. It allows filtering data easily by searching for specific words based on created indexes. This made searches very efficient, and it also allows for log collection through Kafka and helps with managing logs and customizing searches according to needs, such as grouping by dates or user IDs.
What needs improvement?
Elastic Search could improve in areas such as search criteria and query processes, as search times were longer prior to implementing Elastic Search. Elastic Search has limitations for handling huge amounts of data and updates, especially if updates are frequent. It doesn't handle big data scale efficiently, especially regarding data size and scale, compared to Apache Solr. It doesn't support real-time search effectively, as it refreshes the indexes every few seconds.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is stable as many companies already use Elastic Search. In cloud scenarios, it manages well by scaling up or down based on peak traffic. Otherwise, similar functionality needs to be replicated in a private cloud, including backups.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Elastic Search requires enhancements for handling huge amounts of data and updates. Segmenting or sharding data and complexities regarding the cluster can be issues. Updating in Elastic Search involves index computations and user dependencies. There might be issues regarding data size and scaling, but these can be tuned and improved.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I remember Apache Solr, which is generally used for much larger scale data compared to Elastic Search. Apache Solr is used by most companies, and while Elastic Search is very common, there are technologies similar to Elastic Search, though I'm not familiar with all the names.
What other advice do I have?
I have used Elastic Search, but I might not be aware of many internal details; I just used the API to create an index, manage data, and search. It's very useful. On a scale of 1-10, I rate it an eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Private Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Really amazing experience easy to use easy to understand and easy to analyse
What do you like best about the product?
choosing the cloud is easy and it works with vm's just as well as physical hardware
What do you dislike about the product?
it works with Vm but something it is not in real time , if you set an event it takes time
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
really good tool compare to others like qradar and other tools in market and easy to implement and easy to use and set up , make rally good tool to analyse events
Log management capabilities impress but setup presents challenges
What is our primary use case?
The main use case for Elastic Search is mainly for log management.
What is most valuable?
I appreciate the indexing capabilities and the speed of indexing in their product, which demonstrates how quickly logs are collected and stored. The search capabilities are also valuable.
What needs improvement?
The architecture of Elastic Search could be improved as it is complicated for most general users to build up the environment and maintain the cluster.
Currently, I do not have suggestions for additional functions that could be added to the product.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Elastic Search for about two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
I usually use Elastic Search on-premises, which introduces complexity in deployment. Using the cloud version would reduce the complexity of setting up.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability for Elastic Search as eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability as eight.
How are customer service and support?
I would rate technical support from Elastic Search as three out of ten.
The main issue is a general sum of all factors. Being based in Hong Kong means I can only assess the service in my region and cannot speak for other regions based on my experience.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Negative
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I am currently working with multiple solutions including Elastic Search, Splunk, and Graylog.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup for Elastic Search is complex.
What other advice do I have?
The real-time analytics capabilities depend on whether you use the paid version or open-source version.
I work with SME users of Elastic Search, though the solution can technically support enterprise customers.
I have not extensively used AI technology with Elastic Search.
I can recommend Elastic Search to other users.
The pricing for Elastic Search rates as four out of ten. Overall, I would rate Elastic Search as seven out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
User optimizes data analysis with advanced search features and seeks expanded functionality
What is our primary use case?
I have been using it for a year. The main use cases involved implementing search functionality.
What is most valuable?
When discussing the features of Elastic Search, the full text search capabilities are particularly beneficial for handling large volumes of data.
The full text search capabilities in Elastic Search have proven to be extremely valuable for our operations.
Regarding AI integration, we have not yet implemented any AI-driven projects or initiatives using Elastic Search.
What needs improvement?
There are some features and functionality that could be enhanced in Elastic Search to improve its overall capabilities.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Elastic Search for a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
In terms of performance and stability, Elastic Search has proven to be a reliable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The environment includes multiple users utilizing Elastic Search across different locations.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Before implementing Elastic Search, I had experience working with other search engines from different vendors.
How was the initial setup?
The implementation strategy involved specific steps during the setup process to ensure proper configuration.
What was our ROI?
The main benefits observed from using Elastic Search include improvements in operational efficiency, along with cost, time, and resource savings.
What other advice do I have?
I previously used Graylog.
I am currently working with Elastic Search as the primary solution.
My role is Senior DevOps engineer at UVIK Digital.
On a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest, I would rate Elastic Search as an 8 overall as a product and solution.
A nosql fast, scalable and realiable big data tool
What do you like best about the product?
its very fast, easy implementation and scalable, offer end to end solution from data ingestion using huge numbers of integrations with other tools and platforms, with its agents and open source supported data ingestion and communication protocols, Elasticsearch as NOsql data base and kibana as their analytics tool, with many options for dashboards reporting and visualization, like lens, tsvb, vega visualization and many more
What do you dislike about the product?
migration from tradition databases which holds many to many relationships in their table schemas are hard to migrate to elastic as their are some other tricks and techniques to do this but I think it can be improved
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
its solving latency issues over networks, we are using in cybersecurity solutions, while working with big data tools as it is very fast and offer end to end data solutions with various options available, it offers data analytics as well as ingestion as well as a fast database solutions.
Efficient data storage and quick searching boost productivity
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use case was primarily for data storage and quick searching. We focused on getting objects from the database and filtering them efficiently. This involved getting and searching through objects.
How has it helped my organization?
Our productivity was consistently maintained while using this database. Its consistent performance allowed us to maintain steady productivity levels.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Elasticsearch was the quick search capability, allowing us to search by any criteria needed. The searches were executed very quickly, which made the process reliable. Additionally, full-text queries were integral to our usage. Our productivity was consistently maintained with this database. Its consistent performance allowed us to maintain steady productivity levels.
What needs improvement?
It would be useful if a feature for renaming indices could be added without affecting the performance of other features. However, overall, the consistency and stability of Elasticsearch are already commendable, and they should keep up the good work.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Elasticsearch for two and a half years while at this company.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of Elasticsearch was very high, and I would rate it a ten. It was consistent and reliable in our usage.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Elasticsearch was decently scalable, matching our data growth. I would rate its scalability a ten.
How was the initial setup?
I was not involved in the initial setup. However, the setup process for smaller projects was straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
One person from our DevOps team was responsible for the maintenance of Elasticsearch.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We used the open-source version of Elasticsearch, which was free.
What other advice do I have?
If a feature for renaming indices could be added without affecting the performance of all other features, it would be nice to have. Overall, I rate Elasticsearch a ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
The command-based configuration simplifies data management and setup
What is our primary use case?
I have used the Wazuh SIEM tool, an open-source SIEM tool that uses Elasticsearch for indexing. In this SIEM tool, we have a large amount of logs. Data are converted into alerts, then they are stored in our environment for monitoring and security purposes. For storing that data in Wazuh, we use Elasticsearch indexing.
What is most valuable?
Configuring Elasticsearch is much easier compared to comprehending other SIEM tools like Splunk. It has a full command-based access that allows you to configure how much data you want to store and set up retention policies. I can easily change the bandwidth for the network to send log data. Elasticsearch is quite user-friendly and offers a hands-on experience for configuring databases.
What needs improvement?
Elasticsearch should have simpler commands for window filtering. It is primarily based on Unix or Linux-based operating systems and cannot be easily configured in Windows systems. Multi-operating system support would be a great improvement.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used it for approximately two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
It can be installed on cloud and locally, with no issues.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I would rate the stability of Elasticsearch as a seven. There have been multiple instances where I faced errors due to network bandwidth issues. The data transfer sometimes exceeded the bandwidth limits without proper notification, which caused issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate the scalability of Elasticsearch as an eight. The high scalability is somewhat limited by its lack of support for different operating systems other than Linux.
How are customer service and support?
I have never used their technical support. I usually resolve issues on my own or with the help of online community forums.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
How was the initial setup?
The complexity of the initial setup depends on the requirements. In an MSSP scenario, where multiple clients use the same software, there is a need to segregate the data. This can make the setup more complex, especially for a single client where you need to adjust network configurations.
What was our ROI?
For time-saving, Elasticsearch is a good software. It is stable, and we do not encounter critical issues like server downtime, which could result in data loss. There are minor misconfigurations regarding data transfer rates that I have noticed sometimes.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'm not familiar with the pricing details as it falls under the finance department. My manager handles the costing. However, given that we have been using it for two years, I can suggest that it's priced sensibly for us.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
If you can't afford a large SIEM tool like Splunk and QRadar, Elasticsearch is a viable alternative.
What other advice do I have?
Overall, considering key aspects like cost, learning curve, and data indexing architecture, Elasticsearch is a very good tool. I would rate it as a nine.
Improved performance in data aggregation and has a fast performance
What is our primary use case?
I use the solution to store historical data and logs to find anomalies within the logs. That is about it. I don't create dashboards from it.
What is most valuable?
I find the solution to be fast. Aggregation is faster than querying directly from a database, like Postgres or Vertica. It's much faster if I want to do aggregation. These features allow me to store logs and find anomalies effectively.
What needs improvement?
I found an issue with Elasticsearch in terms of aggregation. They are good, yet the rules written for this are not really good.
There is a maximum of 10,000 entries, so the limitation means that if I wanted to analyze certain IP addresses more than 10,000 times, I wouldn't be able to dump or print that information. I need to use paging or something similar as a workaround. That's what the limitation is all about.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have probably used it for three or four years, maybe longer.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very good with no issues or glitches.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
In terms of scalability, I have multiple Search instances. I can actually add more storage and memory because I host it in the cloud. It's much easier in terms of scalability, and I have no complaints about it.
How are customer service and support?
I have never talked to technical support.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I am using Elasticsearch.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is very easy.
What about the implementation team?
I did not use any outside assistance.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I don't know about pricing. That is dealt with by the sales team and our account team. I was not involved with that.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I am evaluating InfluxDB as well. Timescub is a kind of database.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate Elasticsearch at eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Public Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Efficient large data handling and good scalability empowers legal search
What is our primary use case?
We are using Elastic Search for free text search. We scan cache files and convert them into OCR. This allows our end users to search for any judgment given in the 1980s or 1990s based on their criteria.
What is most valuable?
Elastic Search is very quick when handling a large volume of data. The facet search is particularly valuable. It is scalable. Elastic Search makes handling large data volumes efficient and supports complex search operations.
What needs improvement?
There should be more stability. When we started learning it, new versions came out frequently in one quarter with extended features. This can create problems for new developers because they have to quickly switch to another version. Stability could be improved, as it sometimes requires quick adaptation to new versions.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Elastic Search for two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Elastic Search is generally stable, however, the frequent release of new versions can cause challenges for stability. If asked to rate stability, I would give it an eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Elastic Search is scalable. Our supreme court uses it for the whole nation across all judgments, so it must be scalable.
How are customer service and support?
We have not contacted customer service. We rely on documentation for solutions.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We are using Elastic Search for free text search in our project.
How was the initial setup?
The documentation for Elastic Search is very well structured. It provides easy-to-follow steps for installation, making it a straightforward process.
What about the implementation team?
One person can install Elastic Search by following the documentation steps.
What was our ROI?
Our organization prioritizes open-source tools. We have not purchased any licensed products, and our use of Elastic Search is purely open-source, contributing positively to our ROI. We adopt open-source tools due to the organization's policy.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Our experience has been positive, finding solutions in documentation without needing customer support. We also use supporting technologies like PostgreSQL, Spring Boot, and Subversion for seamless integration.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Elastic Search nine out of ten.
Effective unstructured data management with room for large-scale optimization
What is our primary use case?
The primary use case for Elasticsearch is to serve as a non-SQL database platform to replace traditional SQL processes. It is used in situations where unstructured data needs to be studied and searched.
How has it helped my organization?
Elasticsearch has been helpful due to its ability to handle unstructured data effectively compared to SQL. It provides a fast and interesting search capability which is advantageous for our needs.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of Elasticsearch is its convenience in handling unstructured data, making it easy to use.
What needs improvement?
Elasticsearch could be improved in terms of scalability. If the database becomes too large, its efficiency is not as good as SQL. Additionally, the initial setup could be a little easier.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been using Elasticsearch for about two to three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We have faced shutdown issues, but these are mostly related to problems with our own machines and not due to Elasticsearch itself.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Elasticsearch is not scalable when dealing with very large databases. The efficiency decreases for huge databases because it deals with unstructured data, which presents an inherent problem.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is of medium difficulty since it requires some understanding of the disk and related concepts.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Elasticsearch can be expensive. It requires some support and unlocking of features.
What other advice do I have?
I recommend Elasticsearch for anyone looking to build a simple database, as it should be a top choice.
I'd rate the solution seven out of ten.
showing 1 - 10