Miro
MiroExternal reviews
10,008 reviews
from
and
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Effortless Collaboration with Intuitive Features
What do you like best about the product?
I like the sticky features and how easy it is to use Miro. I value being able to copy and paste PDFs and screenshots easily. I also appreciate how easy it is to collaborate with others using Miro. The initial setup was really easy and straightforward.
What do you dislike about the product?
Sometimes it's hard for people to figure out how to access Miro. And, like, the team's permissions and stuff. That could be improved.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Miro solves collaboration issues, providing a space with visual assets that's easy to navigate.
Review 1
What do you like best about the product?
What I like most about Miro is how flexible and intuitive the canvas is for both individual thinking and team collaboration. The drag-and-drop interface makes it very fast to sketch ideas, organize workflows, or build complex diagrams without feeling restricted. It genuinely speeds up brainstorming sessions, especially when working with remote teams, because everyone can contribute in real time and see changes instantly.
From a UI/UX perspective, it strikes a good balance between simplicity and depth. It’s easy to get started, but still powerful enough for advanced use cases like product planning, mind mapping, or design reviews. The navigation and zooming feel smooth, even on large boards, which is critical for heavy usage.
Integrations are another strong point. Being able to connect Miro with tools like Slack, Jira, or Google Drive makes it fit naturally into an existing pipeline instead of feeling like an isolated tool. This helps reduce context switching and keeps everything more organized.
Performance is generally solid. Even with large boards and multiple collaborators, it remains responsive most of the time. There can be occasional slowdowns on extremely heavy boards, but overall it handles scale better than most similar tools.
In terms of pricing and ROI, it’s quite reasonable considering how much it improves team alignment and communication. It can replace multiple smaller tools and reduce meeting time, which makes it worth the investment for teams that collaborate frequently.
Support and onboarding are also well handled. The templates, tutorials, and ready-made frameworks make it easy for new users to get productive quickly without a steep learning curve.
The AI features are a nice addition as well. While not always essential, they can help speed up tasks like summarizing boards or generating initial structures, which adds extra value over time.
Overall, Miro is a very reliable and versatile collaboration tool that significantly improves workflow efficiency, especially for distributed teams.
From a UI/UX perspective, it strikes a good balance between simplicity and depth. It’s easy to get started, but still powerful enough for advanced use cases like product planning, mind mapping, or design reviews. The navigation and zooming feel smooth, even on large boards, which is critical for heavy usage.
Integrations are another strong point. Being able to connect Miro with tools like Slack, Jira, or Google Drive makes it fit naturally into an existing pipeline instead of feeling like an isolated tool. This helps reduce context switching and keeps everything more organized.
Performance is generally solid. Even with large boards and multiple collaborators, it remains responsive most of the time. There can be occasional slowdowns on extremely heavy boards, but overall it handles scale better than most similar tools.
In terms of pricing and ROI, it’s quite reasonable considering how much it improves team alignment and communication. It can replace multiple smaller tools and reduce meeting time, which makes it worth the investment for teams that collaborate frequently.
Support and onboarding are also well handled. The templates, tutorials, and ready-made frameworks make it easy for new users to get productive quickly without a steep learning curve.
The AI features are a nice addition as well. While not always essential, they can help speed up tasks like summarizing boards or generating initial structures, which adds extra value over time.
Overall, Miro is a very reliable and versatile collaboration tool that significantly improves workflow efficiency, especially for distributed teams.
What do you dislike about the product?
While Miro is a powerful tool, there are a few areas that could be improved. The UI/UX, although generally intuitive, can start to feel cluttered when working on very large or complex boards. Finding specific elements or navigating dense canvases sometimes becomes inefficient, especially without stricter organizational tools.
Integrations are useful, but they’re not always as seamless as expected. For example, syncing with tools like Jira can feel limited or require extra manual steps, which reduces the benefit of having everything connected in one workflow.
Performance can also become an issue on heavier projects. Large boards with many assets and collaborators occasionally introduce lag, slow zooming, or delayed interactions, which can disrupt the flow during live collaboration sessions.
In terms of pricing, while it offers good value for teams that use it heavily, it can feel expensive for smaller teams or individual users, especially since some essential features are locked behind higher tiers. This can limit accessibility for freelancers or smaller studios.
Support and onboarding are decent overall, but when it comes to more advanced use cases, documentation can feel a bit surface-level. It sometimes takes trial and error to fully understand best practices for scaling boards or managing complex workflows.
The AI features are a promising addition, but currently they feel somewhat basic and not deeply integrated into real production workflows. They can help with simple tasks, but don’t yet provide significant efficiency gains for more advanced or technical use cases.
Overall, while none of these are deal-breakers, they are areas where improvements could make Miro a much stronger and more scalable tool.
Integrations are useful, but they’re not always as seamless as expected. For example, syncing with tools like Jira can feel limited or require extra manual steps, which reduces the benefit of having everything connected in one workflow.
Performance can also become an issue on heavier projects. Large boards with many assets and collaborators occasionally introduce lag, slow zooming, or delayed interactions, which can disrupt the flow during live collaboration sessions.
In terms of pricing, while it offers good value for teams that use it heavily, it can feel expensive for smaller teams or individual users, especially since some essential features are locked behind higher tiers. This can limit accessibility for freelancers or smaller studios.
Support and onboarding are decent overall, but when it comes to more advanced use cases, documentation can feel a bit surface-level. It sometimes takes trial and error to fully understand best practices for scaling boards or managing complex workflows.
The AI features are a promising addition, but currently they feel somewhat basic and not deeply integrated into real production workflows. They can help with simple tasks, but don’t yet provide significant efficiency gains for more advanced or technical use cases.
Overall, while none of these are deal-breakers, they are areas where improvements could make Miro a much stronger and more scalable tool.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Miro primarily solves the challenge of organizing ideas and collaborating effectively in a distributed or fast-paced environment. Instead of relying on scattered notes, static documents, or long meetings, it provides a single visual space where everything—from brainstorming to planning—can happen in real time.
For me, the biggest benefit is clarity and speed. Complex ideas, workflows, or systems are much easier to understand when they’re visualized. It helps align everyone quickly, especially in team discussions where different people think in different ways. Rather than explaining things multiple times, I can just build it on the board and iterate together.
It also significantly improves collaboration. Whether it’s brainstorming, giving feedback, or planning tasks, everyone can contribute simultaneously, which reduces back-and-forth and shortens decision-making time. This is especially valuable when working with remote teams.
Another key benefit is workflow efficiency. I can go from rough ideas to structured plans in the same space without switching tools. This reduces friction and keeps everything centralized, which saves time and keeps projects more organized.
Overall, Miro helps turn abstract ideas into clear, actionable visuals, making communication faster and more effective.
For me, the biggest benefit is clarity and speed. Complex ideas, workflows, or systems are much easier to understand when they’re visualized. It helps align everyone quickly, especially in team discussions where different people think in different ways. Rather than explaining things multiple times, I can just build it on the board and iterate together.
It also significantly improves collaboration. Whether it’s brainstorming, giving feedback, or planning tasks, everyone can contribute simultaneously, which reduces back-and-forth and shortens decision-making time. This is especially valuable when working with remote teams.
Another key benefit is workflow efficiency. I can go from rough ideas to structured plans in the same space without switching tools. This reduces friction and keeps everything centralized, which saves time and keeps projects more organized.
Overall, Miro helps turn abstract ideas into clear, actionable visuals, making communication faster and more effective.
Easy-to-Use for Flowcharts and Storyboarding
What do you like best about the product?
We liked how easy Miro is to use, especially for flowcharts and using it as a storyboard. It performs well, and we used it to good effect when rolling out EOS across the business. We never needed to contact support or go through any onboarding.
What do you dislike about the product?
It was more expensive than we would have liked, and once we completed our EOS project, we struggled to find an ongoing use for it. We didn’t try to integrate it with anything else, but that was largely because we couldn’t find a strong reason to.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
It helped us with storyboarding, accountability planning, and general post-it note style collaboration, making it easier to visualise ideas and structure discussions.
Miro Makes Process Visualization Easy
What do you like best about the product?
In Miro, you can easily visualize processes, which helps others understand them better.
What do you dislike about the product?
There’s not much I don’t like; perhaps a few more template examples could be added to give me some extra ideas on how to sketch something even better.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
In my role, where I’m constantly optimizing work processes, it’s really helpful to visualize them so I can quickly identify where a problem lies and resolve it.
Enterprise-Level Charting with Seamless Ecosystem Integration
What do you like best about the product?
Enterprise level chart maker. It's nicely integrated into the rest of our ecosystem. A lot of people can use it at once, with no drastic lag in performance.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't care for all the AI integrations and helpers, I wish I could opt out. The lag between opening a link and the board showing up is annoyingly long, sometimes the reaction time between my action and the board reflecting it that I toggle away to my other tabs and forget what I was doing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Making charts for the business and being able to work on it with teammates. Like google drive for charts
Facilitates Workshops with Ease, UX Shines
What do you like best about the product?
I use Miro for brainstorming, workshopping, prototyping, and note-taking. It really solves the hassle with facilitating workshops and combining research. I love the UX and the facilitator tools. The switch from Figma was definitely for the better UX. The initial setup was easy too.
What do you dislike about the product?
the AI tool and the templates
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Miro solves the hassle with facilitating workshops and combining research.
Easy to Use, Feature-Rich, and Reliable—with Great AI, MCP, and Documentation
What do you like best about the product?
Easy to use, consistently updated with new features, and backed by a great UX. With the new MCP integration, it’s straightforward to build agents and improve my work performance even further.
With the AI features, its easy to make the work done and get proper insights, specially with the Miro Flows and Sidekicks.
We have proper documentation not only for the product but also for the AI and MCP features as well which makes the product useful and very reliable for quick onboarding.
Abou the performance it's very stable with a few outages, which is very good for a SaaS product.
The pricing model could be better since today I think it's too expensive, the free version is also too limited.
With the AI features, its easy to make the work done and get proper insights, specially with the Miro Flows and Sidekicks.
We have proper documentation not only for the product but also for the AI and MCP features as well which makes the product useful and very reliable for quick onboarding.
Abou the performance it's very stable with a few outages, which is very good for a SaaS product.
The pricing model could be better since today I think it's too expensive, the free version is also too limited.
What do you dislike about the product?
The pricing model could be better, especially around the AI features. I subscribed to the first tier because I wanted to use more Flows, but then I realized that “unlimited” Flows are only available on the Business tier, which is far above my budget for a single user.
There weren’t clear specifications about this, and it made me feel a bit uncomfortable after subscribing at a higher price.
There weren’t clear specifications about this, and it made me feel a bit uncomfortable after subscribing at a higher price.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Miro is addressing AI scalability issues pretty quickly, and it seems to add new features to the product every week.
Intuitive and Time-Saving, But Needs Enhanced Text Features
What do you like best about the product?
I love Miro's intuitive format, which makes it very easy to set up. I also appreciate the various templates, which are well-thought-out and ready to use. These templates are a real time saver since I don't have to create anything from scratch. It helps me clarify the design and facilitates brainstorming. It's also helpful for getting stakeholders to contribute their ideas without needing to hold meetings.
What do you dislike about the product?
I often feel frustrated when I need to type long texts into Miro. It has limited characters and formatting. I wish it embeds a bit of Word element, or Notion kind of format, easy to create header or insert pages, etc. I would like to be able to create header, color code, or add code block or insert image as document, but it has so much limitation if I was to do that.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Miro to mock-up projects as an informal 'sign off' before diving into content creation. It helps me clarify designs and makes brainstorming easier, often skipping meetings by having stakeholders contribute directly.
Easy to Use, Needs Fewer Annoyances
What do you like best about the product?
I like that Miro is easy to use and offers a lot of options, which is really helpful for planning slides and presentations in school. I find it makes my slide presentations prettier. The initial setup was also very easy and fast.
What do you dislike about the product?
The AI feature that pops up every time I open a project is a little annoying, it feels like Adobe. Also, I wish there were more shortcut keys.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I use Miro to plan slides and presentations, making them prettier. It's easy to use with lots of options.
Robust, Long-Term Strategy Boards with Helpful AI Summaries and Strong Templates
What do you like best about the product?
The most helpful part about Miro, that helps it stand apart from Figjam for me, is that it can function as a long-term 'living strategy' document, rather than purely for temporary in-person collaboration. While the Figma integration is useful, I like how Miro has a more robust organizational structure. I've also experimented with using the AI tool to summarize sticky notes, and found it surprisingly useful in getting a clean picture out of messy data. I also think the templates in Miro are a bit more useful than what I can find in Figjam, and I personally have not had any issues with performance or lagging.
What do you dislike about the product?
As a designer, the thing I dislike about Miro definitely would be the lack of customization when it comes to the visual aesthetic. I understand the need for simplicity, but at the same time I would feel much more compelled to use it if I could create a visually beautiful document — this could mean allowing users to use hex codes/color wheel to pick their stickies colors, having more font options or font size options beyond small, medium, etc.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
There is an inherent value in spatial thinking and reasoning that is often lost in modern collaborative software, and I think that is the main area Miro solves for. It is definitely most valuable during early-phase project work — the ambiguous stretch where you're moving between research synthesis and direction-setting and nothing has a fixed form yet. Having a shared surface where I can cluster interview quotes next to emerging patterns next to rough flow sketches means the thinking stays connected rather than fragmenting across Google Docs, Figma files, and Slack threads.
showing 151 - 160