I work as a consultant with Miro and am involved in consultancy, project management, and process management for some companies. I also collaborate with these companies if they require a collaborative tool for large-scale projects. For example, if there are some projects and a large group works together, we use Miro on such projects as the solution is excellent for managing large-scale projects. Given its efficiency in managing large projects, I did not hesitate to purchase the license, and currently, fifteen projects are running on Miro.
Miro
MiroExternal reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Great For Mind Mapping
Miro is by far the best tool to visualize, plan, organize, and collaborate
An incredibly flexible application that enables easy collaboration for our software teams
Great, flexible and user friendly tool
It has an excellent range of templates to choose from which is particularly helpful when you trying a task for the first time as it gives an excellent framework to order your thinking and guide you through the process.
I've used it for process mapping, idea/concept mapping, product roadmapping, sprint reviews and retrospectives and backlog management.
Whenever I'm not sure on how to get started on a task I search the templates and there is always something applicable to what I need to do.
Real-time collaborative canvas
Brilliant tool for collaboration
Given its efficiency in managing large projects, I did not hesitate to purchase the license
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
I haven't fully assessed the time reduction or cost-effectiveness yet since I've recently started using Miro to manage projects in this new way. Initially, I may save more time as I can visualize everything in one place and streamline project activities. I've also noticed that collaborating with others has become more efficient as we can quickly share visualizations and information. While I can't quantify the exact time saved yet, I believe there is a positive impact on efficiency.
What is most valuable?
As a consultant managing multiple projects, I find Miro's collaboration features highly beneficial. One standout feature is the ease of inviting guests to the board, making it straightforward for users to join and contribute. Miro's intuitive interface also speeds up collaboration, allowing everyone to effortlessly create process maps and diagrams. Additionally, the ability to see real-time updates on the board makes it feel like a virtual meeting, enhancing team communication. Regarding integrations, I've experimented with integrating Mirowith Jira and Microsoft Teams, although I found the Microsoft Teams integration less helpful and mainly used Jira integration for specific tasks.
What needs improvement?
I would like to see enhancements in Miro, especially when working with tables like Excel. Adding more copying, pasting, and formatting functions within tables would be helpful. Additionally, I wish for better picture editing capabilities, such as cropping and changing colours. So far, I haven't encountered any significant limitations while using Miro.
Miro can be slow with other online meeting tools like Zoom or Microsoft Teams.
Also, other platforms like Microsoft Teams might be more suitable for managing many files and ensuring team access. Miro could improve for complex tasks like dynamic object connections, but these are minor cons compared to its benefits.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Miro for two to three months.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I haven't encountered significant stability issues, although sometimes it can be slower when using it alongside other online meeting tools like Zoom or Microsoft Teams.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It is scalable as of now. Currently, it's just me using Miro, but I'll soon have one or two team members joining. I also have about twenty guests collaborating on the projects.
How was the initial setup?
Setting up Miro was intuitive and fast, primarily since I often work with software. It's one of the best solutions I've used. I'm using the cloud-based version of Miro, and it took me about two hours to deploy and start working with it. As for maintenance, I'm still exploring it, especially regarding project lifecycle management.
What was our ROI?
Regarding pros, Miro is highly intuitive and great for visual collaboration. It allows me to easily organize various types of content like tables, PDFs, and diagrams in one place.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The initial cost of Miro was a bit high for me as a small company. However, considering its many benefits and the number of projects I have, it's reasonable and worth the investment.
What other advice do I have?
I would advise other users to use Miro as it is a simple-to-use tool. Firstly, I use Miro and Microsoft Teams, but Miro is much more intuitive. You can place it visually on everything and in one place. You can put the table, the worksheets, the PDF, and diagrams to be visualized and laced; it is beneficial. On the other hand, when you have, for example, many files and need a large team to access them, it's better to keep it on some other platform like Teams. Navigation between documents is better in Teams than Miro when dealing with more complex projects.
Secondly, I think there is a need for a project manager to take out the benefits of the application. So, the platform is not for everybody; it is specifically designed for projects with a specific start and end time. And then, you have to place the results, the outcomes, and the documents and create them in the leading system. I feel Miro is not for keeping evidence or storing documentation. But if you can take the documents and outcomes and keep them saved in some other platform, then Miro is perfect for your organization or project. So I would recommend having a project manager in the company, who should be the main editor of the Miro.
I'd rate Miro a ten out of ten overall.