ScyllaDB Enterprise
ScyllaDB, Inc | 2024.1.7Linux/Unix, Ubuntu 22.04 - 64-bit Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Reviews from AWS Marketplace
0 AWS reviews
-
5 star0
-
4 star0
-
3 star0
-
2 star0
-
1 star0
External reviews
External reviews are not included in the AWS star rating for the product.
Promising
What do you like best about the product?
The alternative solution for Cassandra to improve the performance while using Janus Graph is to store the data in a graph structure
What do you dislike about the product?
It would have been great to see reference/sample configuration for Scylla db with Janus graph to achieve greater performance. currently, it is missing
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are trying to improve the performance of the back-end system while using Janus graph for storing data in a graph structure.
- Leave a Comment |
- Mark review as helpful
Awesome NoSQL database for generating reports and complex queries
What do you like best about the product?
ScyllaDB is currently the best non-memory database to generate reports astonishingly faster. The worker node principle compared to the primary slave architecture of MongoDB, which I now use, is a huge bonus since I am not wasting any valuable system resources.
What do you dislike about the product?
I don't get the confidence to use ScyllaDB as a full production use DB since I had a few instances where the DB terminated due to heavy load. It needs more time to mature and gain my trust for full-fledged standalone production usage.
Edit: The more recent versions of ScyllaDB are more stable. We have finally deployed the reporting server to our production environment running ScyllaDB and have faced no issues till now.
Edit: The more recent versions of ScyllaDB are more stable. We have finally deployed the reporting server to our production environment running ScyllaDB and have faced no issues till now.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We use ScyllaDB in our organization to generate reports. The time taken for report generation in ScyllaDB is significantly faster compared to MongoDB, which we are currently using as our main Production DB
Recommendations to others considering the product:
ScyllaDB is great if you want to generate reports or perform complex queries on millions of data
it can be use with kubernetes, docker, and etc
What do you like best about the product?
it can be used on multiplatform and have good performance
What do you dislike about the product?
it had low popularity in my country I recommended you have more collaboration with a university in Indonesian
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
because Scylla based on a NoSQL database, it had a good performance, and it can be used on hi demand applications
Highly performant NoSQL DB so far
What do you like best about the product?
We migrated our test environment DB from Cassandra to ScyllaDB and saw huge improvements in speed and consistency. The flexibility of having CQL and easy migration is an added bonus on top of the consistency.
What do you dislike about the product?
We haven't tried it production grade environment yet to find flaws, but one thing we didn't like is that the UI is a bit confusing at the beginning (especially for non-devs).
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Being used in test environment for data heavy application which requires consistent data at all times! Making data available at a consistent rate, open-source, uses much faster language (C++) at core.
High performance, low latency
What do you like best about the product?
Utilization of modern multi-core servers
What do you dislike about the product?
Needs CPU and I/O schedulers and CQL queryable Change Data Capture
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
Covering fault tolerance with replication across multiple nodes, low latency
Recommendations to others considering the product:
Attend their Scylla University live trainings
ScyllaDB my favorite NoSQL Database
What do you like best about the product?
The fast response time and scalability of this database solution are amazing to me, coming from a SQL background. It also provides high availability and provides excellent uptime for critical workloads.
What do you dislike about the product?
It was a challenging database platform to get used to coming from a SQL background. I could not get the training materials at first as the documentation was a bit confusing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
I am currently building a streaming app and picked ScyllaDB to test how suitable it will be with storing sreaming data. It is pretty neat with support for a wide range of APIs, which gives me the flexibility to build in my own space.
Ultra Blazing Fast
What do you like best about the product?
Its native C++ implementaion and using seastar framework instead of Java thread context switching make it super fast and remove all the JVM overheads. Customizatio on IOPS is the unique factor for using it for high processing dataloads.
What do you dislike about the product?
Documentation could have been better, a handy desktop client like Mongo Atlas, etc.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
We are in the middle of a migration to Scylla for high throughput, able to use for Data processing workloads which boil down to IOPS optimization, page faults, etc. Availability on GCP make it easy to choose
Highly scalable and easy on my pocket!
What do you like best about the product?
The unmatchable speed and pricing of ScyllaDB, it has outperformed every other NoSQL database I have tested and has managed to stay on top of all the pricing structure as well.
What do you dislike about the product?
Managing of resources by non-developers can be difficult and can be improved by developing a more user friendly design approach that event a tech newbie can understand.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
The ability of Kafka streaming, global localization and many other plugins makes ScyllaDB scalable and quick
One of the best NoSQL Database
What do you like best about the product?
ScyllaDB is extremely fast when it comes to the processing of data. It works without any latency with High-intensity applications. When it comes to technology, the whole codebase is open source. It means that you can also contribute to the project. The multi-core servers, along with the database's compatibility with Cassandra and DynamoDB, are beneficial. Also, there is the ScyllaDB university for those who want to learn about NoSQL from scratch and get a certification. ScyllaDB is scalable with always on availability with high throughputs.
What do you dislike about the product?
I have used ScyllaDB and have taken ScyllaDB's courses. I haven't found any problem so far. So, nothing to dislike from my side. Some more programs related to the DevRel part can be good. Also, the documentation is well documented, but a "write for us" program will be amazing.
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
There are several problems that I was facing before using ScyllaDB. I was having trouble with data processing and latency. Thanks to ScyllaDB for solving that. Plus, I had to manage my database manually, but with ScyllaDB, I got to experience a fully managed service.
Recommendations to others considering the product:
I highly recommend others to use ScyllaDB to get a fully managed, open-source, and scalable NoSQL database experience.
Scylla is the real-time big data database that is API-compatible with Apache and manny more
What do you like best about the product?
The monstrously-fast NoSQL database, having compatibility with real-time big data database that is API-compatible with Apache and many more inetgrations.
What do you dislike about the product?
Documenataion is a bit challenging part , apart form this
What problems is the product solving and how is that benefiting you?
materialized views, global and local secondary indexes, workload prioritization, and a DynamoDB-compatible API.
showing 181 - 190