Overview

Product video
This is a repackaged open source software wherein additional charges apply for extended support with a 24 hour response time.
Overview
Deploy and manage your containerized applications seamlessly with Docker on Ubuntu 22. This AMI provides a fully configured environment optimized for running Docker, making it ideal for developers and operations teams looking to leverage the power of containerization.
Features
- Pre-Configured Environment: This image comes with Docker pre-installed and configured, reducing the time spent on setup and allowing you to hit the ground running.
- Ubuntu 22 Base: Build on a stable and widely-used Linux distribution known for its robust performance and extensive community support.
- Enhanced Security: Benefit from the latest security updates and features available in Ubuntu 22 while utilizing Docker's containerization for added security layers.
- Scalable Architecture: Easily scale your applications with Docker's orchestration capabilities, making it suitable for both small projects and large-scale deployments.
Benefits
- Rapid Deployment: Quickly launch instances without worrying about manual installations and configuration tasks.
- Flexibility: Utilize Docker containers to run any application, supporting a wide range of programming languages and frameworks.
- Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resource usage by isolating applications, hence allowing multiple workloads to share the same host without conflicts.
Use Cases
- Microservices Architecture: Perfect for organizations adopting microservices, allowing teams to develop, test, and deploy services independently.
- Development and Testing: Streamline your CI/CD pipeline by spinning up containers for fast build, test, and deploy cycles.
- Stateless Applications: Ideal for deploying web applications that maintain no persistent state, facilitating easier scaling and management.
Leverage the flexibility and robustness of Docker on Ubuntu 22 to innovate, deploy, and manage your applications with unparalleled efficiency.
Try our most popular AMIs on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 24.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 22.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 20.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- Ubuntu 18.04 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 10 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- CentOS 8 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 12 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 11 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 10 AMI on AWS EC2
- Debian 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 9 (RHEL 9) AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 (RHEL 8) AMI on AWS EC2
- Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 (RHEL 7) AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 9 AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 8 AMI on AWS EC2
- Oracle Linux 7 AMI on AWS EC2
- Amazon Linux 2023 AMI on AWS EC2
- Windows 2022 Server AMI on AWS EC2
- Windows 2019 Server AMI on AWS EC2
- Docker on Ubuntu 22 AMI on AWS EC2
- Docker on CentOS 10 AMI on AWS EC2
Highlights
- Experience seamless application containerization with Docker on Ubuntu 22, offering robust support for microservices architecture. Users can deploy, manage, and scale applications in isolated environments, enhancing development workflow. Its compatibility with numerous languages and frameworks allows for flexible coding practices, making it ideal for teams employing CI/CD pipelines and agile methodologies.
- Utilize the efficient resource management capabilities provided by Docker on Ubuntu 22, enabling high-density deployments and reducing infrastructure costs. With built-in networking and storage features, developers can ensure secure communication between containers while optimizing data persistence. This facilitates reliable application performance even under varying workloads, making it suitable for both development and production environments.
- Gain access to a vast ecosystem of pre-built images and community support through Docker Hub. This expedites the bootstrapping process of new projects and allows developers to leverage existing solutions quickly. Additionally, extensive documentation and community contributions provide valuable resources for troubleshooting and best practices, empowering teams to maximize productivity and innovation.
Details
Introducing multi-product solutions
You can now purchase comprehensive solutions tailored to use cases and industries.
Features and programs
Financing for AWS Marketplace purchases
Pricing
- ...
Dimension | Cost/hour |
|---|---|
m6in.16xlarge Recommended | $4.48 |
t2.micro | $0.21 |
t3.micro | $0.07 |
m6a.12xlarge | $3.36 |
i3en.2xlarge | $0.56 |
c7a.large | $0.14 |
m5a.24xlarge | $4.48 |
r5dn.8xlarge | $2.24 |
c6i.32xlarge | $4.48 |
r5d.metal | $3.36 |
Vendor refund policy
The instance can be terminated at anytime to stop incurring charges
How can we make this page better?
Legal
Vendor terms and conditions
Content disclaimer
Delivery details
64-bit (x86) Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
Amazon Machine Image (AMI)
An AMI is a virtual image that provides the information required to launch an instance. Amazon EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud) instances are virtual servers on which you can run your applications and workloads, offering varying combinations of CPU, memory, storage, and networking resources. You can launch as many instances from as many different AMIs as you need.
Version release notes
System updates
Additional details
Usage instructions
Once the instance is running, connect to it using a Secure Shell (SSH) client with the configured SSH key. The default username is 'ubuntu'.
OS commands via SSH: SSH as user 'ubuntu' to the running instance and use sudo to run commands requiring root access.
Run docker test with:
sudo docker run hello-world
Resources
Vendor resources
Support
Vendor support
Email support for this AMI is available through the following: https://supportedimages.com/support/ OR support@supportedimages.com
AWS infrastructure support
AWS Support is a one-on-one, fast-response support channel that is staffed 24x7x365 with experienced and technical support engineers. The service helps customers of all sizes and technical abilities to successfully utilize the products and features provided by Amazon Web Services.
Standard contract
Customer reviews
Modern containerization has transformed development workflows and has improved CI CD efficiency
What is our primary use case?
One of those containerized projects is the monitoring stack build, which includes Prometheus, Alertmanager, and Grafana , and it is a really quick thing to run, install, and test. I am using it mainly for tests around the monitoring.
There are actually multiple use cases during my career with Docker on Ubuntu . It was building containers in the CI/CD, and Ubuntu instances actually ran Docker and all the builds and pushed the artifacts to the registries. There were use cases with the projects themselves being containerized, and all various cases. Pretty much everything in modern Linux ecosystems requires Docker .
What is most valuable?
Process isolation has helped me in my work for many reasons, such as the ability to give a specific amount of resources to a process, and the fact that a process does not interfere with other processes. There are multiple advantages to this, but this is generally a container thing.
There are actually great multiple things about the features of Docker on Ubuntu. If we take Ubuntu desktop and Docker desktop, we can see that it has a really great application with many features, including Kubernetes integration, CVE scanning, an easy to install and easy to use UI, the image manager, and all of these things. Docker is super powerful with modern Linux, especially with the industry standard such as Ubuntu.
Docker on Ubuntu has positively impacted my organization by enabling us to be a modern company that uses a modern architecture approach. It is difficult to do this without Docker.
The impact of Docker on Ubuntu includes improvements in speed, efficiency, and resource management, especially noticeable in our CI/CD pipelines. If we build the containers, it is much easier to distribute our application. It is much easier to install, configure, scale, and do pretty much everything. Without this proper containerization, the projects would work worse, there would be fewer options for deployment, and so on.
What needs improvement?
I would not add more about the needed improvements as it is difficult to tell. There are no improvements needed for Docker on Ubuntu that I have not mentioned.
For how long have I used the solution?
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
How are customer service and support?
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
What was our ROI?
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
What other advice do I have?
I do not have any additional thoughts about Docker on Ubuntu before we wrap up. I would rate this product with a review rating of ten.
Container workflows have accelerated builds and now power multi-architecture CI pipelines
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Docker on Ubuntu is to build Docker images for both ARM and AMD architectures, as well as maintaining those Docker images and the registry.
In my daily work, I have a workflow where I build Docker images on an Ubuntu runner or GitLab runner. Apart from GitLab runner, I also utilize the Jenkins pipeline where we have an Ubuntu image with Docker in Docker. It builds the image and pushes it to our ECR. We maintain some of our servers that have Docker Swarm, which are also Ubuntu-based.
What is most valuable?
The best features that Docker on Ubuntu offers include a copy-on-write strategy, as well as having everything in one place. For example, all the Docker registry and Docker images are in one place where we can access them. There is also the ability to add users to the Docker group so that they can run it directly without using sudo permissions, which is one of the best features that I find.
Of the features I mentioned, the one I rely on most day-to-day is the Docker build step, including multi-arch build as well as multi-stage build. I rely on it on a daily basis because our entire infrastructure runs on Docker as well as Kubernetes , which depends on Docker. I definitely rely on it heavily.
Docker on Ubuntu has positively impacted my organization by making our CI/CD pipeline faster because of the multi-stage build, multi-arch build, and the strategy of layering. We don't need to build it again and again. We can use cache for it and write Docker files as well as test them on our local machines. That is one of the best features that we have.
I have definitely noticed time saved and faster deployments.
What needs improvement?
Docker Desktop requires opening it again and again when we want to build. If there were a way to run the engine on the backend side, that would be very helpful.
Docker on Ubuntu is pretty much smooth and really helps a lot.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Docker on Ubuntu for 10 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Docker on Ubuntu is very much stable; it is one of the most stable solutions that you can find.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Docker on Ubuntu's scalability is highly impressive in the form of Docker Swarm or Docker Compose, scoring 10 out of 10 on scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I have not used the customer support yet because I have never needed one, but the documentation is pretty much simple to understand and fix issues.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not previously used a different solution.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is pretty much simple because Docker does not have a license and there is no pricing for it. The steps are provided, and we have a shell script written by Docker that you just run, and it does the automatic work for you. It is very much simple.
What was our ROI?
I have seen a return on investment with definitely time saved as well as fewer employees needed because we don't need to maintain the Docker Swarm again and again. There is a pipeline for it, and the time saving occurs because whenever a developer pushes anything, that goes into the Docker container and builds it. It is pretty much time saved, as well as money saved itself.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
We did not purchase Docker on Ubuntu through the AWS Marketplace because Docker is free of cost. We just set it up there.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing Docker on Ubuntu, we evaluated some options including Podman.
We chose Docker on Ubuntu over Podman because Docker was pretty much simple, and it was also one of the buzz topics going on. Additionally, there were people who were using it, which made it pretty much simple to interact with them and gain knowledge about how things are working.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to others looking into using Docker on Ubuntu is to use it. Once you start using it, there is no going back; it is pretty much simple to use. Definitely, it is one of the easiest tools available for containerization. I would rate this product as a 9 out of 10.
Built a reliable cloud foundation that has supported flexible web applications and smooth scaling
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Docker on Ubuntu has been for many reasons, running any type of application on Docker in Kubernetes clusters. Usually, Ubuntu is the operating system that I use. One example is running a web application on Ubuntu on Docker .
I have used a specific web application for marketing events where users go onto the website, place reservations for the event, and read information about the event. It's a classic web application with different web pages, and the setup I used in that example was zero to three EC2 instances on AWS running Ubuntu and Docker, scaling based on the number of users trying to access the webpage to meet availability requirements.
What is most valuable?
The best features Docker on Ubuntu offers include really good support as Canonical, the makers of Ubuntu, and Docker, the company, work closely together. Ubuntu is definitely the most widely used operating system for Docker, so when new features come about or security patches are released, they usually go to Ubuntu first, which is good. I have also found personally that when using documentation to build out applications, most of the documentation references using Ubuntu, making it easier. There is a lot of documentation and community support, including many Stack Overflow articles, to help someone use Ubuntu and Docker.
The performance is good, and Docker and Ubuntu are designed to work together very effectively since Docker likely chose Ubuntu as its reference OS. The functionality of the two working together is very good, and it's easy to install packages using Ubuntu's apt package manager when using Docker. If you wanted to install adjacent tools like Docker Compose or NVIDIA Docker for GPUs, it's very easy to do those types of things, and there's also a lot of documentation available on how to do it.
Docker on Ubuntu has positively impacted my organization because it really serves as a bedrock combination for building applications on top of it. You need a solid, stable base, and Docker, as a container platform, is very stable and widely used, much of like Ubuntu, making for a strong foundation to build on.
What needs improvement?
Docker on Ubuntu can be improved because Ubuntu is not minimalist at all; it comes with a lot of software by default. This has led some individuals, including myself, to try using Alpine, which is more lightweight, allowing the container to run on a more lightweight operating system that potentially uses fewer resources and reduces costs. If Ubuntu were a little more minimalist, that would be good, but it's not really aiming for that since it intends to be the baseline. Also, Ubuntu moves very fast, possibly faster than other operating systems like Debian , which could demand operational heavy upgrades to major versions every couple of years if there are many applications running.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Docker on Ubuntu for around five years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Docker on Ubuntu is very stable. Docker is continually optimized by the Docker company, and Ubuntu is also continually optimized. They link very well together, so it's stable currently, and I imagine it will continue to be long into the future.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Docker on Ubuntu is highly scalable, but it really depends on how you're deploying Docker and Ubuntu and what you're deploying it on. Using Docker on Ubuntu together is a common configuration, and you can deploy it directly on server hardware using virtual machines or in the cloud, scaling however you wish, so I rate it ten out of ten for scalability.
How are customer service and support?
My customer support experience was on AWS , and Amazon's customer support is brilliant, with very quick response times, so I give it ten out of ten.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Positive
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I tried using Docker on CentOS before, but CentOS became deprecated, which is why I switched to Ubuntu, as I believe it won't become deprecated anytime soon due to its wide usage. So, Ubuntu is more stable for that requirement.
Before choosing Docker on Ubuntu, I evaluated using Docker on CentOS as the other option.
How was the initial setup?
My experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing is that the costs can vary for purchasing machine images, but it's very cheap for open source operating systems like Ubuntu, and I can't remember if it was free or very low cost. It might have even been free since it's open source, making it very good.
What about the implementation team?
My company does not have a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer.
What was our ROI?
I wouldn't say that using Ubuntu and Docker directly saves money, time, or requires fewer employees. It's more about forming a baseline so that whatever application you are building on top of it can deliver those benefits. You need some type of operating system and a container engine, and these two are best in class; it allows whatever you build on top of it to achieve return on investment metrics.
What other advice do I have?
I would say there are fewer errors, and organizations could see at least a ten percent reduction in their errors if they use a popular OS like Ubuntu compared to less known or less documented ones. Additionally, easier scaling is definite, as Ubuntu is very easy to use and scales nicely. Organizations can leverage cloud auto-scaling groups, leading to cost savings, at least ten percent to maybe twenty percent from the scaling.
I advise others to use Docker on Ubuntu if they have a standard use case. If they need a highly secure operating system on a container engine, they might want something more security-focused, or if they want something lightweight, they might choose Linux Alpine, but for most use cases, it's brilliant.
I give this product a rating of ten out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Containerization has streamlined consistent Linux environments and now simplifies hybrid workflows
What is our primary use case?
I use Docker on Ubuntu primarily for containerizing applications and development environments, creating consistent runtime environments across development and testing, reducing dependency issues, and simplifying the development workflow on the Linux ecosystem.
Recently, I was working with an application for one of the Linux ALSA-based advanced Linux audio system applications, and I had to containerize that application so that we could run it on different devices and different Ubuntu OS versions. I used Docker for this purpose.
In some update systems, I was building some software updates, and I also used Docker for those tasks. There are many additional cases where I have used Docker.
What is most valuable?
The best features that Docker on Ubuntu offers are container isolation, fast startup time, portability, and strong integration with the Ubuntu Linux ecosystem, making it easy to package applications with their dependencies and run them consistently across systems.
Portability and the isolation that containers provide are very useful, as is the fast setup. All these features of Docker are very useful because they help set up environments very quickly on other operating systems without any dependencies, which is a very valuable feature of Docker.
In the Ubuntu ecosystem, the integration is very strong, which I think is one of the best features. The compatibility of Docker with the Ubuntu system is one of the best features.
In my organization, we use the Linux ecosystem exclusively for our development, and my team's development environment is based entirely on the Linux system. We have multiple devices where the system is running. Docker helps us port our software and applications to many devices without any dependencies, such as without any other installation, pre-installed application, or library. Whatever is needed is only packaged in Docker, so it helps us port the application very quickly and very easily. Docker has definitely improved productivity and reliability significantly.
What needs improvement?
Docker on Ubuntu could be improved by making networking and storage configuration simpler, specifically for teams new to containers. Better built-in tooling or clearer documentation for debugging container networking issues would help tremendously. Tightening integration with security tooling and providing clear guidance on container hardening would be useful for production environments. Simplifying networking and improving documentation for debugging would make Docker on Ubuntu even better.
One additional pain point is managing containers at scale. As the number of containers grows, it becomes more complex and requires additional tools. Troubleshooting container networking or volume-related issues can sometimes be time-consuming, specifically in more advanced setups.
For how long have I used the solution?
I started using Docker on Ubuntu three years ago.
What other advice do I have?
I have deployed Docker on our private server. We primarily use Docker on on-premises systems and, in some cases, in hybrid setups where development and testing may run on cloud-based environments while production remains on-premises. This approach gives us the best control over hardware, networking, and costs, specifically for embedded and system-level workloads.
In our hybrid setup, we mainly use AWS for development and testing workloads while the production ecosystem runs on-premises, utilizing AWS for tasks including CI/CD pipelines, container image storage, and temporary test environments. For our cloud side, we use AWS through the AWS Marketplace combined with on-premises infrastructure for our core system.
From my experience, pricing and licensing for Docker on Ubuntu are very straightforward. Docker itself is open source and when used on Ubuntu, there are no licensing costs, which significantly reduces setup and operational expenses. When using Docker via AWS Marketplace , pricing is transparent and usage-based, making cost planning easier. Overall, Docker on Ubuntu helps us avoid vendor lock-in and reduces infrastructure costs compared to traditional VM-based deployments.
Using Docker on Ubuntu helps us save time and operational efforts rather than directly reducing headcount. It saved setup time by seventy percent, reduced VMs and infrastructure cost by thirty to forty percent, and improved team productivity without needing additional engineers.
Before choosing Docker on Ubuntu, we evaluated a few other options, including VM-only deployments and Docker on other Linux distributions like CentOS and Amazon Linux , but Ubuntu offered better documentation, community support, and smoother Docker integration.
On a scale of one to ten, I would give Docker on Ubuntu a rating of eight.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Daily containerized workflows have improved consistency and saved time in local development
What is our primary use case?
My main use case for Docker on Ubuntu is mostly for local development. I use Docker on Ubuntu to run and test services, isolate containers, and keep my setup consistent. For example, I use it to run a local web application with a database so I can test everything in a containerized environment.
How has it helped my organization?
Docker on Ubuntu has positively impacted my organization by improving consistency and reducing setup time, which makes development workflows more efficient. From the company perspective, it saves time by keeping environments consistent and minimizing setup and configuration issues across the team.
What is most valuable?
The best features Docker on Ubuntu offers are consistency and easy setup. It helps avoid dependency conflicts and keep environments predictable. I can always isolate a service and work without affecting my system. Since I use Ubuntu on my computer, I use Docker on Ubuntu every day in my life because I think it runs faster and I can work better.
What needs improvement?
Docker on Ubuntu can be improved because the initial learning curve could be smoother for new users. The Docker documentation could be better with more real-world examples in the documentation, specifically end-to-end examples for common use cases. I think it is more about better integration and clear best practices.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Docker on Ubuntu for around two years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I find Docker on Ubuntu to be stable. I started with AWS and have no problems with Amazon Cloud.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Docker on Ubuntu's scalability is good, as both are stable and scalable. Ubuntu is very stable as an operating system, and Docker scales well when used properly across projects and environments. I have no problems with the scalability.
How are customer service and support?
I have not needed customer support for Docker on Ubuntu.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have not previously used a different solution before Docker on Ubuntu.
What was our ROI?
I do not have the exact metrics regarding the return on investment because I do not track that. The main return is time-saving, as it provides less setup time, fewer errors, and improved developer productivity.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I do not have a problem with the pricing for Docker on Ubuntu because I do not pay for that; my boss does. I only use the tools.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
I never evaluated other options before choosing Docker on Ubuntu as I started with that.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for others looking into using Docker on Ubuntu would be to follow the official documentation and practice with simple projects before using it in more complex environments. Be patient with the learning curve and be confident as you learn by taking baby steps. I would rate this product an 8 overall.